Image file generating device and image file generating method
US-2020242154-A1 · Jul 30, 2020 · US
US11710034B2 · US · B2
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Publication number | US-11710034-B2 |
| Application number | US-201916287313-A |
| Country | US |
| Kind code | B2 |
| Filing date | Feb 27, 2019 |
| Priority date | Feb 27, 2019 |
| Publication date | Jul 25, 2023 |
| Grant date | Jul 25, 2023 |
A practical reading order for non-experts. Skip the full description unless you need deep technical detail.
What the patent document calls the invention.
A short plain-language summary of the technical disclosure.
Who owns or filed the patent and who is credited as inventor.
Filing, priority, publication, and grant dates set the timeline.
The legal scope of protection — read this for what is actually claimed.
Technology tags used to group this patent with similar filings.
Prior art links and similar publications in this corpus.
Official abstract text for this publication.
A mechanism is described for facilitating misuse index for explainable artificial intelligence in computing environments, according to one embodiment. A method of embodiments, as described herein, includes mapping training data with inference uses in a machine learning environment, where the training data is used for training a machine learning model. The method may further include detecting, based on one or more policy/parameter thresholds, one or more discrepancies between the training data and the inference uses, classifying the one or more discrepancies as one or more misuses, and creating a misuse index listing the one or more misuses.
Opening claim text (preview).
What is claimed is: 1. A non-transitory computer readable storage medium comprising instructions which, when executed by a data processing machine, cause the data processing machine to perform operations comprising: mapping training data with inference uses in a machine learning environment, wherein the training data is used for training a machine learning model and the inference uses correspond to application of the machine learning model; detecting, based on one or more policy/parameter thresholds, one or more discrepancies between the training data and the inference uses; identifying, based on the one or more discrepancies, that one or more misuses of the machine learning model occurred; determining, based on the one or more discrepancies, a misuse index value corresponding to a misuse index; and estimating, based on the misuse index value, a severity of the one or more misuses of the machine learning model and identify one or more responses to the one or more misuses. 2. The non-transitory computer readable storage medium of claim 1 , wherein the inference uses are based on field data captured using one or more capturing devices including one or more of a camera, a microphone, and one or more sensors, wherein the training data and the field data are labeled with metadata to identify detailed contents relating to one or more of the training data and the field data, wherein the machine learning environment is part of an explainable artificial intelligence (XAI) environment. 3. The non-transitory computer readable storage medium of claim 1 , wherein the operations further comprise: determining the one or more misuses to be one or more errors or one or more policy/parameter-altering acts; modifying the misuse index to distinguish between the one or more errors and the one or more policy/parameter-altering acts; and proposing actionable tasks to respond to the one or more policy/parameter-altering acts, wherein the actionable tasks include one or more of modifying the one or more policy/parameter thresholds, pausing the one or more policy/parameter-altering acts, and issuing one or more warnings to prevent future occurrences of the one or more policy/parameter-altering acts. 4. The non-transitory computer readable storage medium of claim 2 , wherein the one or more policy/parameter thresholds are based on one or more features including one or more of governmental laws, administrative rules and regulations, organizational policies, cultural norms, societal customs, and ethical expectations, wherein the one or more policy/parameter thresholds are dynamically modified based on changes in the one or more features, wherein the one or more features are extracted from one or more of the training data, the field data, the metadata, and user inputs. 5. The non-transitory computer readable storage medium of claim 4 , wherein the operations further comprise: transmitting one or more surveys to one or more computing devices over one or more communication mediums, wherein the one or more surveys are used to collect the user inputs from one or more users having access to the one or more computing devices, wherein the user inputs includes one or more of policy contexts, policy reasons, and policy recommendations; evaluating the one or more policy/parameter thresholds based on the user inputs; and modifying the one or more policy/parameter thresholds based on the user inputs. 6. The non-transitory computer readable storage medium of claim 5 , wherein the operations further comprise adjusting the detection of the one or more discrepancies based on the one or more modified policy/parameter thresholds. 7. The non-transitory computer readable storage medium of claim 1 , wherein the data processing machine comprises one or more processors including one or more of a graphics processor and an application processor, wherein the one or more processors are co-located on a common semiconductor package. 8. A method comprising: mapping training data with inference uses in a machine learning environment, wherein the training data is used for training a machine learning model and the inference uses correspond to application of the machine learning model; detecting, based on one or more policy/parameter thresholds, one or more discrepancies between the training data and the inference uses; identifying, based on the one or more discrepancies, that one or more misuses of the machine learning model occurred; determining, based on the one or more discrepancies, a misuse index value corresponding to a misuse index; and estimating, based on the misuse index value, a severity of the one or more misuses of the machine learning model and identify one or more responses to the one or more misuses. 9. The method of claim 8 , wherein the inference uses are based on field data captured using one or more capturing devices including one or more of a camera, a microphone, and one or more sensors, wherein the training data and the field data are labeled with metadata to identify detailed contents relating to one or more of the training data and the field data, wherein the machine learning environment is part of an explainable artificial intelligence (XAI) environment. 10. The method of claim 8 , further comprising: determining the one or more misuses to be one or more errors or one or more policy/parameter-altering acts; modifying the misuse index to distinguish between the one or more errors and the one or more policy/parameter-altering acts; and proposing actionable tasks to respond to the one or more policy/parameter-altering acts, wherein the actionable tasks include one or more of modifying the one or more policy/parameter thresholds, pausing the one or more policy/parameter-altering acts, and issuing one or more warnings to prevent future occurrences of the one or more policy/parameter-altering acts. 11. The method of claim 9 , wherein the one or more policy/parameter thresholds are based on one or more features including one or more of governmental laws, administrative rules and regulations, organizational policies, cultural norms, societal customs, and ethical expectations, wherein the one or more policy/parameter thresholds are dynamically modified based on changes in the one or more features, wherein the one or more features are extracted from one or more of the training data, the field data, the metadata, and user inputs. 12. The method of claim 11 , further comprising: transmitting one or more surveys to one or more computing devices over one or more communication mediums, wherein the one or more surveys are used to collect the user inputs from one or more users having access to the one or more computing devices, wherein the user inputs includes one or more of policy contexts, policy reasons, and policy recommendations; evaluating the one or more policy/parameter thresholds based on the user inputs; modifying the one or more policy/parameter thresholds based on the user inputs; and adjusting the detection of the one or more discrepancies based on the one or more modified policy/parameter thresholds. 13. The method of claim 8 , wherein the method is facilitated by one or more processors including one or more of a graphics processor and an application processor, wherein the one or more processors are co-located on a common semiconductor package. 14. An apparatus comprising: one or more processors to: map training data with inference uses in a machine learning environment, wherein the training data is used for training a machine learning model and the inference uses correspond to application of the machine learning model; detect, based on one or more poli
Machine learning · CPC title
Convolutional networks [CNN, ConvNet] · CPC title
Supervised learning · CPC title
Interactive pattern learning with a human teacher · CPC title
Clustering; Classification · CPC title
Related publications grouped by family.
Answers are generated from the same data shown on this page.