Scalable spine nodes with partial replication of routing information in a network environment
US-2020167369-A1 · May 28, 2020 · US
US11698805B2 · US · B2
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Publication number | US-11698805-B2 |
| Application number | US-201916532098-A |
| Country | US |
| Kind code | B2 |
| Filing date | Aug 5, 2019 |
| Priority date | Jul 8, 2019 |
| Publication date | Jul 11, 2023 |
| Grant date | Jul 11, 2023 |
A practical reading order for non-experts. Skip the full description unless you need deep technical detail.
What the patent document calls the invention.
A short plain-language summary of the technical disclosure.
Who owns or filed the patent and who is credited as inventor.
Filing, priority, publication, and grant dates set the timeline.
The legal scope of protection — read this for what is actually claimed.
Technology tags used to group this patent with similar filings.
Prior art links and similar publications in this corpus.
Official abstract text for this publication.
In an embodiment, a computer-implemented method for dynamically exchanging runtime state data between datacenters with a gateway using a controller bridge is disclosed. In an embodiment, the method comprises: receiving one or more first runtime state data from one or more logical sharding central control planes (“CCPs”) controlling one or more logical sharding hosts; receiving one or more second runtime state data from a gateway that is controlled by a CCP that also controls one or more physical sharding hosts; aggregating to aggregated runtime state data, the one or more first runtime state data received from the one or more logical sharding CCPs and the one or more second runtime state data received from the gateway; determining updated runtime state data based on the aggregated runtime state data, the one or more first runtime state data, and the one or more second runtime state data; and transmitting the updated runtime state data to at least one of the one or more logical sharding CCPs and the gateway.
Opening claim text (preview).
What is claimed is: 1. A computer-implemented method for dynamically exchanging runtime state information between datacenters operating with a gateway using a controller bridge, the method comprising: receiving, by a controller bridge, one or more first runtime state data from one or more logical sharding central control planes (“CCPs”) controlling one or more logical sharding hosts; receiving, by the controller bridge, one or more second runtime state data from a gateway that is controlled by a CCP that also controls one or more physical sharding hosts, wherein the one or more second runtime state data received from the gateway comprises a mapping between virtual network identifiers (“VNIs”) and a gateway remote tunnel endpoint (“RTEP”); aggregating, by the controller bridge, to aggregated runtime state data, the one or more first runtime state data received from the one or more logical sharding CCPs and the one or more second runtime state data received from the gateway; determining updated runtime state data using the controller bridge that tracks aggregation of the runtime state data based on the aggregated runtime state data, the one or more first runtime state data, and the one or more second runtime state data; and causing at least one of the one or more logical sharding CCPs and the gateway to manage or control logical switches or virtual switches based at least on the updated runtime state data. 2. The computer-implemented method of claim 1 , wherein the RTEP is used by the gateway to perform packet encapsulation and to receive packets from the one or more physical sharding hosts. 3. The computer-implemented method of claim 1 , wherein the gateway reports, to the controller bridge, one or more mappings between virtual network identifiers (“VNIs”) and RTEPs implemented in the gateway and does not report one or more mappings between VNIs and virtual tunnel endpoints (“VTEPs”) implemented in the one or more physical sharding hosts that are serviced by the gateway. 4. The computer-implemented method of claim 1 , wherein the gateway maintains one or more mappings in which one or more logical switches include VTEPs implemented in the one or more physical sharding hosts that are controlled by the CCP that also controls the gateway. 5. The computer-implemented method of claim 1 , wherein the updated runtime state data is determined and transmitted to CCPs dynamically and without freezing traffic forwarding operations; and wherein the updated runtime state data includes forwarding table information, including a mapping between VNIs of logical routers configured in sharding hosts and VTEPs established within a logical network. 6. The computer-implemented method of claim 1 , further comprising: receiving, by the one or more logical sharding CCPs, of the one or more logical sharding CCPs, first update state information; and causing the one or more logical sharding CCPs to use the first update state information to update a mapping between VNIs and corresponding VTEPs implemented in the one or more logical sharding hosts managed by the one or more logical sharding CCPs. 7. The computer-implemented method of claim 1 , further comprising: causing receiving, by the gateway, second update state information, and causing the gateway to store the second update state information in a mapping between VNIs and corresponding RTEP. 8. One or more non-transitory computer-readable storage media storing one or more computer instructions which, when executed by one or more processors, cause the one or more processors to perform: receiving one or more first runtime state data from one or more logical sharding central control planes (“CCPs”) controlling one or more logical sharding hosts; receiving one or more second runtime state data from a gateway that is controlled by a CCP that also controls one or more physical sharding hosts, wherein the one or more second runtime state data received from the gateway comprises a mapping between virtual network identifiers (“VNIs”) and a gateway remote tunnel endpoint (“RTEP”); aggregating to aggregated runtime state data, the one or more first runtime state data received from the one or more logical sharding CCPs and the one or more second runtime state data received from the gateway; determining updated runtime state data based on the aggregated runtime state data, the one or more first runtime state data, and the one or more second runtime state data; and causing at least one of the one or more logical sharding CCPs and the gateway to manage or control logical switches or virtual switches based at least on the updated runtime state data. 9. The one or more non-transitory computer-readable storage media of claim 8 , wherein the RTEP is used by the gateway to perform packet encapsulation and to receive packets from the one or more physical sharding hosts. 10. The one or more non-transitory computer-readable storage media of claim 8 , wherein the gateway reports, to the controller bridge, one or more mappings between virtual network identifiers (“VNIs”) and RTEPs implemented in the gateway and does not report one or more mappings between VNIs and virtual tunnel endpoints (“VTEPs”) implemented in the one or more physical sharding hosts that are serviced by the gateway. 11. The one or more non-transitory computer-readable storage media of claim 8 , wherein the gateway maintains one or more mappings in which one or more logical switches include VTEPs implemented in the one or more physical sharding hosts that are controlled by the CCP that also controls the gateway. 12. The one or more non-transitory computer-readable storage media of claim 8 , wherein the updated runtime state data is determined and transmitted to CCPs dynamically and without freezing traffic forwarding operations; and wherein the updated runtime state data includes forwarding table information, including a mapping between VNIs of logical routers configured in sharding hosts and VTEPs established within a logical network. 13. The one or more non-transitory computer-readable storage media of claim 8 , storing additional instructions for causing: the one or more logical sharding CCPs to receive first update state information; and the one or more logical sharding CCPs to use the first update state information to update a mapping between VNIs and corresponding VTEPs implemented in the one or more logical sharding hosts managed by the one or more logical sharding CCPs. 14. The one or more non-transitory computer-readable storage media of claim 8 , storing additional instructions for causing: the gateway to receive second update state information; and the gateway to store the second update state information in a mapping between VNIs and corresponding RTEP. 15. A controller bridge implemented in a computer network and configured to implement mechanisms for dynamically exchanging runtime state data between datacenters, the control bridge comprising: one or more processors; one or more memory units; and one or more non-transitory computer-readable storage media storing one or more computer instructions which, when executed by the one or more processors, cause the one or more processors to perform: receiving, by the controller bridge, one or more first runtime state data from one or more logical sharding central control planes (“CCPs”) controlling one or more logical sharding hosts; receiving, by the controller bridge, one or more second runtime state data from a gateway that is controlled by a CCP that also controls one or more physical sharding hosts, wherein the one or more second runtime state data received from the gateway c
Network integration; Enabling network access in virtual machine instances · CPC title
Hypervisor-specific management and integration aspects · CPC title
Distribution of virtual machine instances; Migration and load balancing · CPC title
Techniques for rebalancing the load in a distributed system · CPC title
Interconnection of networks using encapsulation techniques, e.g. tunneling · CPC title
Related publications grouped by family.
Answers are generated from the same data shown on this page.