Computer implemented method of determining a base curve for a spectacle lens and method of manufacturing a spectacle lens
US-2020050020-A1 · Feb 13, 2020 · US
US11693258B2 · US · B2
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Publication number | US-11693258-B2 |
| Application number | US-202217676528-A |
| Country | US |
| Kind code | B2 |
| Filing date | Feb 21, 2022 |
| Priority date | Sep 3, 2019 |
| Publication date | Jul 4, 2023 |
| Grant date | Jul 4, 2023 |
A practical reading order for non-experts. Skip the full description unless you need deep technical detail.
What the patent document calls the invention.
A short plain-language summary of the technical disclosure.
Who owns or filed the patent and who is credited as inventor.
Filing, priority, publication, and grant dates set the timeline.
The legal scope of protection — read this for what is actually claimed.
Technology tags used to group this patent with similar filings.
Prior art links and similar publications in this corpus.
Official abstract text for this publication.
A computer-implemented method for fitting a spectacle lens, which has a first spectacle lens surface, a second spectacle lens surface, and at least one dioptric power to be obtained, to a spectacle frame with a certain frame edge curve is made available. In the method, a free-form surface formed on a first spectacle lens surface is fitted to the frame edge curve of the spectacle frame. The free-form surface is fitted to the frame edge curve by virtue of the free-form surface and the second spectacle lens surface being optimized with regard to minimizing the difference between the free-form surface edge curve and the frame edge curve and with regard to achieving the at least one dioptric power to be obtained with the spectacle lens.
Opening claim text (preview).
The invention claimed is: 1. A computer-implemented method for fitting a spectacle lens having a first spectacle lens surface, a second spectacle lens surface, and at least one intended dioptric power to a spectacle frame having a predetermined frame edge curve, the method comprising: fitting a free-form surface formed on the first spectacle lens surface to the frame edge curve of the spectacle frame, wherein the free-form surface is fitted to the frame edge curve by simultaneously optimizing the free-form surface and the second spectacle lens surface with regard to minimizing a difference between the free-form surface edge curve and the frame edge curve and with regard to attaining the at least one intended dioptric power of the spectacle lens, the free-form surface and the second spectacle lens surface mutually influencing one another during the optimization, wherein the simultaneous optimization of the free-form surface and the second spectacle lens surface is implemented iteratively, the second spectacle lens surface being altered first in each iteration step and the free-form surface then being optimized with regard to attaining the at least one intended dioptric power of the spectacle lens, wherein in each iteration step the optimization of the free-form surface is followed by a determination of a measure for a deviation of the free-form surface edge curve present after the optimization of the free-form surface from the frame edge curve; and terminating the method if the measure for the deviation is less than a given value or a change in the measure is less than a given value, or, otherwise, in a subsequent iteration step: modifying the second spectacle lens surface; and subsequently optimizing the free-form surface again with regard to attaining the at least one intended dioptric power of the spectacle lens. 2. The computer-implemented method as claimed in claim 1 , wherein the second spectacle lens surface is a spherical spectacle lens surface, an aspherical spectacle lens surface, a toric spectacle lens surface, or an atoric spectacle lens surface. 3. The computer-implemented method as claimed in claim 1 , wherein an initial spectacle lens having a first spectacle lens surface with a specified curvature serves as a starting point for the iterative optimization. 4. The computer-implemented method as claimed in claim 3 , wherein the second spectacle lens surface is initially determined in the first iteration step with regard to the at least one intended dioptric power of the spectacle lens and the free-form surface is then optimized with regard to attaining the at least one intended dioptric power of the spectacle lens. 5. The computer-implemented method as claimed in claim 1 , wherein the measure for the deviation is based on a difference edge curve that represents a difference in sagittal heights of the free-form surface edge curve and of the frame edge curve at mutually equivalent points of the two edge curves relative to a reference plane, and wherein the second spectacle lens surface is modified based on the difference edge curve. 6. The computer-implemented method as claimed in claim 5 , wherein the second spectacle lens surface is modified by fitting a third spectacle lens surface to the difference edge curve, and overlaying at least one portion of the third spectacle lens surface on the second spectacle lens surface. 7. The computer-implemented method as claimed in claim 1 , wherein a mean surface power of the second spectacle lens surface remains constant when the second spectacle lens surface is modified. 8. The computer-implemented method as claimed in claim 1 , wherein the first spectacle lens surface is the spectacle lens front surface and the second spectacle lens surface is the spectacle lens back surface. 9. A computer program for fitting a spectacle lens having a first spectacle lens surface, a second spectacle lens surface, and at least one intended dioptric power to a spectacle frame having a predetermined frame edge curve, the computer program containing instructions which, when executed on a computer, prompt the computer to fit a free-form surface formed on a first spectacle lens surface to the frame edge curve of the spectacle frame, wherein the computer program moreover comprises instructions which, when executed on a computer, prompt the computer to: simultaneously optimize the free-form surface and the second spectacle lens surface with regard to minimizing a difference between the free-form surface edge curve and the frame edge curve and with regard to attaining the at least one intended dioptric power of the spectacle lens for the purpose of fitting the free-form surface to the frame edge curve, the free-form surface and the second spectacle lens surface mutually influencing one another during the optimization; perform the simultaneous optimization of the free-form surface and the second spectacle lens surface iteratively, the second spectacle lens surface being altered first in each iteration step and the free-form surface then being optimized with regard to attaining the at least one intended dioptric power of the spectacle lens; determine in each iteration step after the optimization of the free-form surface a measure for a deviation of the free-form surface edge curve present after the optimization of the free-form surface from the frame edge curve; terminate the method if the measure for the deviation is less than a given value or a change in the measure is less than the given value, or otherwise, in a subsequent iteration step: modify the second spectacle lens surface; and subsequently optimize the free-form surface again with regard to attaining the at least one intended dioptric power of the spectacle lens, wherein the measure for the deviation is based on a difference edge curve that represents a difference in sagittal heights of the free-form surface edge curve and of the frame edge curve at mutually equivalent points of the two edge curves relative to a reference plane, wherein the second spectacle lens surface is modified based on the difference edge curve, and wherein the second spectacle lens surface is modified by virtue of a third spectacle lens surface being fitted to the difference edge curve and at least one portion of the third spectacle lens surface being overlaid on the second spectacle lens surface. 10. A data processing system for fitting a spectacle lens having a first spectacle lens surface, a second spectacle lens surface, and at least one intended dioptric power to a spectacle frame having a predetermined frame edge curve, the data processing system comprising a processor and at least one memory and the processor being configured, based on instructions of a computer program stored in the at least one memory, to fit a free-form surface formed on a first spectacle lens surface to the frame edge curve of the spectacle frame, wherein the processor is moreover configured, based on the instructions of the computer program stored in the memory, to: simultaneously optimize the free-form surface and the second spectacle lens surface with regard to minimizing a difference between the free-form surface edge curve and the frame edge curve and with regard to attaining the at least one intended dioptric power of the spectacle lens for the purpose of fitting the free-form surface to the frame edge curve, the free-form surface and the second spectacle lens surface mutually influencing one another during the optimization; perform the simultaneous optimization of the free-form surface and the second spectacle lens surface iteratively, the second spectacle lens surface being altered first in each iteration step and the free-form surface then being optimized with regar
Special properties achieved by the combination of the front and back surfaces · CPC title
Measuring geometric parameters required to locate ophtalmic lenses in spectacles frames (apparatus for testing or instruments for examining the eyes per se A61B3/00; machines or devices and accessories for grinding the edges of lenses using spectacles as a template B24B9/144) · CPC title
considering wearer's parameters · CPC title
Related publications grouped by family.
Answers are generated from the same data shown on this page.