Intelligent motor vehicles and control logic for managing charging of traction battery packs

Patent metadata

Field	Value
Publication number	US-11685288-B2
Application number	US-202117313088-A
Country	US
Kind code	B2
Filing date	May 6, 2021
Priority date	May 6, 2021
Publication date	Jun 27, 2023
Grant date	Jun 27, 2023

Abstract

Presented are control systems for operating rechargeable electrochemical devices, methods for making/using such systems, and vehicles with intelligent battery charging and charging behavior feedback capabilities. A method of operating a rechargeable battery includes an electronic controller receiving battery data from a battery sensing device indicative of a battery state of charge (SOC). Using this battery data, the controller determines a number of low SOC excursions at which the battery SOC is below a predefined low SOC threshold and a number of high SOC excursions at which the battery SOC exceeds a predefined high SOC threshold. The controller then determines if the number of low SOC excursions exceeds a predefined maximum allowable low excursions and/or the number of high SOC excursions exceeds a predefined maximum allowable high excursions. If so, the controller responsively commands a resident subsystem to execute a control operation that mitigates degradation of the rechargeable battery.

First claim

What is claimed:

1. A method of operating a rechargeable battery, the method comprising:
receiving, via an electronic controller from a battery sensing device, battery data indicative of a battery state of charge (SOC) and a battery temperature of the rechargeable battery;
determining a rolling evaluation window that varies with a battery age range and/or a date range;
determining an actual level of degradation of the rechargeable battery;
comparing the actual level of degradation with an estimated level of degradation of the rechargeable battery at a current date and/or a current age of the rechargeable battery;
determining a magnitude of discrepancy between the actual level of degradation and the estimated level of degradation;
adjusting the battery age range and/or date range of the rolling evaluation window responsive to the actual level of degradation differing from the estimated level of degradation by at least a predefined differential buffer, a size of the adjustment of the battery age range and/or date range being dependent upon the magnitude of discrepancy;
determining, within the rolling evaluation window via the electronic controller using the received battery data, a number of low SOC excursions at which the battery SOC is below a predefined low SOC threshold and a number of high SOC excursions at which the battery SOC is above a predefined high SOC threshold;
determining if the number of low SOC excursions exceeds a predefined maximum allowable low excursions and if the number of high SOC excursions exceeds a predefined maximum allowable high excursions; and
transmitting, via the electronic controller responsive to the number of low SOC excursions exceeding the predefined maximum allowable low excursions and/or the number of high SOC excursions exceeding the predefined maximum allowable high excursions, a command signal to a resident subsystem to execute a control operation predetermined to mitigate degradation of the rechargeable battery.

2. The method of claim 1 , wherein determining the rolling evaluation window includes calling up the rolling evaluation window from a memory device.

3. The method of claim 1 , wherein determining the actual level of degradation of the rechargeable battery includes evaluating measured battery data to identify a real-time or near real-time battery deterioration, and wherein the estimated level of degradation of the rechargeable battery is derived using benchtop emulator data and/or lab testing data.

4. The method of claim 1 , wherein adjusting the battery age range and/or date range of the rolling evaluation window includes dynamically increasing or decreasing a size of the rolling evaluation window if the actual level of degradation is at least 5% less than or more than, respectively, estimated level of degradation.

5. The method of claim 1 , further comprising:
determining, via the electronic controller using the received battery data, a number of low SOC charges in which the rechargeable battery was recharged with a starting SOC value of the battery SOC below the predefined low SOC threshold and the battery temperature below a predefined low temperature threshold; and
determining if the number of low SOC charges exceeds a predefined maximum allowable low SOC charges,
wherein the command signal is transmitted to the resident subsystem further in response to the number of low SOC charges exceeding the predefined maximum allowable low SOC charge excursions.

6. The method of claim 1 , further comprising:
determining, via the electronic controller using the received battery data, a total high SOC operating time during which the rechargeable battery was operated with the battery SOC above the predefined high SOC threshold; and
determining if the total high SOC operating time exceeds a predefined maximum allowable high SOC operating time,
wherein the command signal is transmitted to the resident subsystem further in response to the total high SOC operating time exceeding the predefined maximum allowable high SOC operating time.

7. The method of claim 1 , further comprising:
determining, via the electronic controller using the received battery data, a total high SOC-temp operating time during which the rechargeable battery was operated with the battery SOC above the predefined high SOC threshold and the battery temperature above a predefined high temperature threshold; and
determining if the total high SOC-temp operating time exceeds a predefined maximum allowable high SOC-temp operating time,
wherein the command signal is transmitted to the resident subsystem further in response to the total high SOC-temp operating time exceeding the predefined maximum allowable high SOC-temp operating time.

8. The method of claim 1 , further comprising:
receiving crowd-sourced battery data indicative of low and high SOC excursions for a multitude of third-party users operating batteries similar to or the same as the rechargeable battery; and
determining the predefined maximum allowable low and high excursions using the crowd-sourced battery data.

9. The method of claim 1 , further comprising retrieving the predefined maximum allowable low and high excursions from a lookup table stored in a memory device.

10. The method of claim 1 , wherein the predefined low SOC threshold is between 5% to 20% SOC and the predefined high SOC threshold is between 80% to 95% SOC.

11. The method of claim 1 , wherein the resident subsystem includes a rechargeable energy storage system (RESS) of a motor vehicle, and wherein the control operation includes limiting or precluding, via the RESS, a charging operation of the rechargeable battery.

12. The method of claim 11 , further comprising receiving, from an operator of the motor vehicle via an electronic input device, a selection to permit or prevent the RESS to limit or preclude the charging operation.

13. The method of claim 1 , wherein the resident subsystem includes a display device of a motor vehicle, and wherein the control operation includes displaying, via the display device to an operator of the motor vehicle, one or more predefined remediating actions that mitigate degradation of the rechargeable battery.

14. An electric-drive vehicle comprising:
a vehicle body with multiple road wheels rotatably attached to the vehicle body;
an electric traction motor attached to the vehicle body and operable to drive one or more of the road wheels to thereby propel the electric-drive vehicle;
a rechargeable traction battery pack attached to the vehicle body and operable to power the electric traction motor; and
a vehicle controller programmed to:
receive battery data from a battery sensing device indicative of a battery state of charge (SOC) and a battery temperature of the traction battery pack;
determine a rolling evaluation window that varies with a battery age range and/or a date range;
determine an actual level of degradation of the traction battery pack;
compare the actual level of degradation with an estimated level of degradation of the traction battery pack at a current date and/or a current age of the traction battery pack;
determine a magnitude of discrepancy between the actual level of degradation and the estimated level of degradation;
adjust the battery age range and/or date range of the rolling evaluation window responsive to the actual level of degradation differing from the estimated level of degradation by at least a predefined differential buffer, a size of the adjustment of the battery age range and/or date range being dependent upon the magnitude of discrepancy;
determine, within the rolling evaluation window using the received batter

Assignees

• Gm Global Tech Operations Llc

Inventors

• Wiebenga Michelle H
• Bika Anil
• Li Wei
• Verbrugge Mark W
• Wampler Charles W
• Sankavaram Chaitanya

Classifications

• Y02T10/70

  Energy storage systems for electromobility, e.g. batteries · CPC title

• B60K35/28

  characterised by the type of the output information, e.g. video entertainment or vehicle dynamics information; characterised by the purpose of the output information, e.g. for attracting the attention of the driver · CPC title

• B60K35/22

  Display screens · CPC title

• B60K2370/152

  Operations & Transport · mapped topic

• B60L58/12 Primary

  responding to state of charge [SoC] · CPC title