Security for multi-tenant deduplication datastore against other tenants
US-2016154839-A1 · Jun 2, 2016 · US
US11663196B2 · US · B2
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Publication number | US-11663196-B2 |
| Application number | US-202117513342-A |
| Country | US |
| Kind code | B2 |
| Filing date | Oct 28, 2021 |
| Priority date | Sep 30, 2015 |
| Publication date | May 30, 2023 |
| Grant date | May 30, 2023 |
A practical reading order for non-experts. Skip the full description unless you need deep technical detail.
What the patent document calls the invention.
A short plain-language summary of the technical disclosure.
Who owns or filed the patent and who is credited as inventor.
Filing, priority, publication, and grant dates set the timeline.
The legal scope of protection — read this for what is actually claimed.
Technology tags used to group this patent with similar filings.
Prior art links and similar publications in this corpus.
Official abstract text for this publication.
In one example, a method includes receiving, at a cloud storage site, chunks that each take the form of a hash of a combination that includes two or more salts and a file object, and one of the salts is a retention salt shared by the chunks, monitoring a time period associated with the retention salt, when the time period has expired, removing the chunks that include the retention salt, and depositing the removed chunks in a deleted items cloud store.
Opening claim text (preview).
What is claimed is: 1. A non-transitory storage medium having stored therein instructions that are executable by one or more hardware processors to perform operations comprising: receiving, at a cloud storage site, chunks that each take the form of a hash of a combination that comprises a plurality of salts and a file object, and one of the salts is a retention salt shared by the chunks, and another of the salts is a user-specific salt; monitoring a time period associated with the retention salt; when the time period has expired, removing the chunks that include the retention salt; depositing the removed chunks in a deleted items cloud store; traversing physical data chunks associated with the user, and the physical data chunks are associated with one or more salted user objects; and determining an amount of backend storage capacity consumed by live objects associated with the user by totaling a size of live physical data chunks identified as a result of the traversing. 2. A non-transitory storage medium as recited in claim 1 , wherein removing and depositing the chunks is performed without the use of a copy-forward garbage collection process. 3. A non-transitory storage medium as recited in claim 1 , wherein receiving the chunks comprises receiving an object that includes the chunks, and removing and depositing the chunks comprises removing the object and depositing the object in the deleted items cloud store. 4. A non-transitory storage medium as recited in claim 1 , wherein the chunks are received at the cloud storage site as part of a tiering process in which the chunks are stored at the cloud storage site according to a particular priority of the chunks relative to other chunks that are, or will be, stored at the cloud storage site. 5. A non-transitory storage medium as recited in claim 1 , wherein the operations further comprise scrubbing chunks stored at the cloud storage site. 6. A non-transitory storage medium as recited in claim 1 , wherein the chunks are stored in a content salted deduplication domain at the cloud storage site. 7. A system, comprising: one or more hardware processors; and a non-transitory storage medium having stored therein instructions that are executable by the one or more hardware processors to perform operations comprising: receiving, at a cloud storage site, chunks that each take the form of a hash of a combination that comprises a plurality of salts and a file object, and one of the salts is a retention salt shared by the chunks, and another of the salts is a user-specific salt; monitoring a time period associated with the retention salt; when the time period has expired, removing the chunks that include the retention salt; depositing the removed chunks in a deleted items cloud store; traversing physical data chunks associated with the user; and determining an amount of backend storage capacity consumed by live objects associated with the user by totaling a size of live physical data chunks identified as a result of the traversing. 8. The system as recited in claim 7 , wherein removing and depositing the chunks is performed without the use of a copy-forward garbage collection process. 9. The system as recited in claim 7 , wherein receiving the chunks comprises receiving an object that includes the chunks, and removing and depositing the chunks comprises removing the object and depositing the object in the deleted items cloud store. 10. The system as recited in claim 7 , wherein the chunks are received at the cloud storage site as part of a tiering process in which the chunks are stored at the cloud storage site according to a particular priority of the chunks relative to other chunks that are, or will be, stored at the cloud storage site. 11. The system as recited in claim 7 , wherein the operations further comprise scrubbing chunks stored at the cloud storage site. 12. The system as recited in claim 7 , wherein the chunks are stored in a content salted deduplication domain at the cloud storage site. 13. The system as recited in claim 7 , wherein the physical data chunks that are traversed are associated with one or more salted user objects. 14. A method, comprising: receiving, at a cloud storage site, chunks that each take the form of a hash of a combination that comprises a plurality of salts and a file object, and one of the salts is a retention salt shared by the chunks, and another of the salts is a user-specific salt; monitoring a time period associated with the retention salt; when the time period has expired, removing the chunks that include the retention salt; depositing the removed chunks in a deleted items cloud store; traversing physical data chunks associated with the user; and determining an amount of backend storage capacity consumed by live objects associated with the user by totaling a size of live physical data chunks identified as a result of the traversing. 15. The method as recited in claim 14 , wherein removing and depositing the chunks is performed without the use of a copy-forward garbage collection process. 16. The method as recited in claim 14 , wherein receiving the chunks comprises receiving an object that includes the chunks, and removing and depositing the chunks comprises removing the object and depositing the object in the deleted items cloud store. 17. The method as recited in claim 14 , wherein the chunks are received at the cloud storage site as part of a tiering process in which the chunks are stored at the cloud storage site according to a particular priority of the chunks relative to other chunks that are, or will be, stored at the cloud storage site. 18. The method as recited in claim 14 , wherein the operations further comprise scrubbing chunks stored at the cloud storage site. 19. The method as recited in claim 14 , wherein the chunks are stored in a content salted deduplication domain at the cloud storage site. 20. The method as recited in claim 14 , wherein the physical data chunks that are traversed are associated with one or more salted user objects.
using de-duplication of the data · CPC title
Ensuring data consistency and integrity · CPC title
Hardware arrangements for backup · CPC title
Hash tables · CPC title
Clustering or classification · CPC title
Related publications grouped by family.
Answers are generated from the same data shown on this page.