Analysis system and production method of analysis image
US-2024290067-A1 · Aug 29, 2024 · US
US11656309B2 · US · B2
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Publication number | US-11656309-B2 |
| Application number | US-202017436627-A |
| Country | US |
| Kind code | B2 |
| Filing date | Mar 4, 2020 |
| Priority date | Mar 6, 2019 |
| Publication date | May 23, 2023 |
| Grant date | May 23, 2023 |
A practical reading order for non-experts. Skip the full description unless you need deep technical detail.
What the patent document calls the invention.
A short plain-language summary of the technical disclosure.
Who owns or filed the patent and who is credited as inventor.
Filing, priority, publication, and grant dates set the timeline.
The legal scope of protection — read this for what is actually claimed.
Technology tags used to group this patent with similar filings.
Prior art links and similar publications in this corpus.
Official abstract text for this publication.
According to an example aspect of the present invention, there is provided generating, Low-Field-Magnetic Resonance Imaging, LF-MRI, or Ultra-Low-Field Magnetic Resonance Imaging, ULF-MRI, data with respect to an image frame, determining a sensorwise agreement of the data with determined sensitivity profiles, and determining a mapping between the image frame and a sensor frame, such that the sensorwise agreement has been fulfilled.
Opening claim text (preview).
The invention claimed is: 1. A method comprising: generating, by a magnetic resonance imaging system comprising sensors arranged at positions around an imaged target volume, Low-Field-Magnetic Resonance Imaging, LF-MRI, or Ultra-Low-Field Magnetic Resonance Imaging, ULF-MRI, data with respect to an image frame; determining, by the magnetic resonance imaging system, a sensorwise agreement of the data with determined sensitivity profiles; and determining, by the magnetic resonance imaging system, a mapping between the image frame and a sensor frame, such that the sensorwise agreement has been fulfilled. 2. The method according to claim 1 , wherein the sensors are configured for magnetoencephalography, MEG, source localization, and the method further comprises: obtaining, by the sensors one or more MEG data sets; and localizing at least one source of electrical brain activity of the MEG data sets based on the determined mapping. 3. The method according to claim 2 , wherein the sensor frame is maintained between generating the LF-MRI data or ULF-MRI data, and the MEG data. 4. The method according to claim 1 , wherein the mapping is determined iteratively using a nonlinear optimization method based on a subset of voxels. 5. The method according to claim 1 , wherein the mapping is determined based on solving a parametrized transfer function between voxel positions of the image frame and the sensor frame. 6. The method according to claim 1 , wherein the sensorwise agreement is based on an objective function for measuring similarity of LF-MRI data or ULF-MRI data and the sensitivity profiles of the sensors. 7. The method according to claim 6 , wherein the criterion comprises one or more or a combination of the following: a target value of the objective function, a gradient of the objective function satisfying at least one condition, a change of the value of the objective function between iterations is sufficiently small, a predetermined number of iterations for determining parameters for the mapping has been reached. 8. The method according to claim 6 , wherein the objective function is determined to reach a target value based on matching, or a similarity of, magnitudes and phases of the sensitivity profiles and the voxels. 9. The method according to claim 6 , wherein the agreement is determined based on an objective function, according to g ( p ) = ∑ n = 1 N v ❘ "\[LeftBracketingBar]" s n ( p ) H u n ❘ "\[RightBracketingBar]" s ( p ) u , where ∥⋅∥ denotes the Euclidean vector norm and (⋅) H the conjugate transpose, N v is a subset of voxels, s is a sensitivity vector, p is coordinate vector of parameters, u is a voxel vector comprising values of a subset of voxels and g is the objective function. 10. The method according to claim 1 , wherein the sensorwise agreement is fulfilled according to at least one criterion. 11. The method according to claim 1 , wherein the sensors comprise Superconducting QUantum Interference Devices, SQUIDs. 12. A magnetic resonance imaging system comprising sensors arranged at positions around an imaged target volume, comprising means for performing: generating Low-Field-Magnetic Resonance Imaging, LF-MRI, or Ultra-Low-Field Magnetic Resonance Imaging, ULF-MRI, data with respect to an image frame; determining a sensorwise agreement of the data with determined sensitivity profiles; and determining a mapping between the image frame and a sensor frame, such that the sensorwise agreement has been fulfilled. 13. The magnetic resonance imaging system according to claim 12 , wherein the sensors are configured for magnetoencephalography, MEG, source localization, and the method comprises: obtaining, by the sensors one or more MEG data sets; and localizing at least one source of electrical brain activity of the MEG data sets based on the determined mapping. 14. The magnetic resonance imaging system according to claim 13 , wherein the sensor frame is maintained between generating the LF-MRI data or ULF-MRI data, and the MEG data. 15. The magnetic resonance imaging system according to claim 12 , wherein the mapping is determined iteratively using a nonlinear optimization method based on a subset of voxels. 16. The magnetic resonance imaging system according to claim 12 , wherein the mapping is determined based on solving a parametrized transfer function between voxel positions of the image frame and the sensor frame. 17. The magnetic resonance imaging system according to claim 12 , wherein the sensorwise agreement is measured based on an objective function for measuring similarity of LF-MRI data or ULF-MRI data and the sensitivity profiles of the sensors. 18. The magnetic resonance imaging system according to claim 17 , wherein the criterion comprises one or more or a combination of the following: a target value of the objective function, a gradient of the objective function satisfying at least one condition, a change of the value of the objective function between iterations is sufficiently small, a predetermined number of iterations for determining parameters for the mapping has been reached. 19. The magnetic resonance imaging system according to claim 17 , wherein the target value of the objective function is determined to reach a target value based on matching, or a similarity of, magnitudes and phases of the sensitivity profiles and the voxels. 20. The magnetic resonance imaging system according to claim 17 , wherein the agreement is determined based on an objective function, according to g
MR involving a non-standard magnetic field B0, e.g. of low magnitude as in the earth's magnetic field or in nanoTesla spectroscopy, comprising a polarizing magnetic field for pre-polarisation, B0 with a temporal variation of its magnitude or direction such as field cycling of B0 or rotation of the direction of B0, or spatially inhomogeneous B0 like in fringe-field MR or in stray-field imaging · CPC title
adapted for acquisition of images from more than one imaging mode, e.g. combining MRI and optical tomography · CPC title
involving a SQUID · CPC title
Testing or calibrating of apparatus covered by the other groups of this subclass · CPC title
Excitation or detection systems, e.g. using radio frequency signals · CPC title
Related publications grouped by family.
Answers are generated from the same data shown on this page.