Checkpoint blockade and microsatellite instability

US11649287B2 · US · B2

Patent metadata
FieldValue
Publication numberUS-11649287-B2
Application numberUS-202117465096-A
CountryUS
Kind codeB2
Filing dateSep 2, 2021
Priority dateNov 13, 2014
Publication dateMay 16, 2023
Grant dateMay 16, 2023

How to read this patent

A practical reading order for non-experts. Skip the full description unless you need deep technical detail.

  1. Title

    What the patent document calls the invention.

  2. Abstract

    A short plain-language summary of the technical disclosure.

  3. Assignees and inventors

    Who owns or filed the patent and who is credited as inventor.

  4. Key dates

    Filing, priority, publication, and grant dates set the timeline.

  5. First independent claim

    The legal scope of protection — read this for what is actually claimed.

  6. CPC / IPC classifications

    Technology tags used to group this patent with similar filings.

  7. Citations and related patents

    Prior art links and similar publications in this corpus.

Abstract

Official abstract text for this publication.

Blockade of immune checkpoints such as cytotoxic T-lymphocyte antigen-4 (CTLA-4) and programmed death-1 (PD-1) shows promise in patients with cancer. Inhibitory antibodies directed at these receptors have been shown to break immune tolerance and promote anti-tumor immunity. These agents work particularly well in patients with a certain category of tumor. Such tumors may be particularly susceptible to treatment because of the multitude of neoantigens which they produce.

First claim

Opening claim text (preview).

We claim: 1. A method for treating colorectal cancer in a human patient, the method comprising: in response to determining that the colorectal cancer is microsatellite instability high or DNA mismatch repair deficient, treating a human patient having colorectal cancer that is microsatellite instability high or DNA mismatch repair deficient with a therapeutically effective amount of pembrolizumab, wherein a biological sample from the patient had previously been tested to determine whether the colorectal cancer is microsatellite instability high or DNA mismatch repair deficient. 2. The method of claim 1 , wherein the biological sample is tumor tissue from the patient. 3. The method of claim 1 , wherein the biological sample is a body fluid from the patient. 4. The method of claim 1 , wherein the colorectal cancer is microsatellite instability high. 5. The method of claim 1 , wherein the colorectal cancer is DNA mismatch repair deficient. 6. The method of claim 1 , wherein the colorectal cancer is metastatic colorectal cancer. 7. The method of claim 1 , wherein the patient had received at least one prior cancer treatment and the cancer had progressed subsequent to the prior treatment. 8. The method of claim 1 , wherein the pembrolizumab is administered to the patient intravenously. 9. The method of claim 4 , wherein the biological sample was tested by a method comprising immunohistochemistry testing, next generation sequencing or PCR testing. 10. The method of claim 1 , wherein the biological sample was tested by a method comprising assessing one or more markers selected from the group consisting of BAT-25, BAT-26, MONO-27, NR-21 and NR-24. 11. A method for reducing the risk of progression of colorectal cancer in a human patient, the method comprising: in response to determining that the colorectal cancer is microsatellite instability high or DNA mismatch repair deficient, treating a human patient having colorectal cancer that is microsatellite instability high or DNA mismatch repair deficient with a therapeutically effective amount of pembrolizumab, wherein a biological sample from the patient had previously been tested to determine whether the colorectal cancer is microsatellite instability high or DNA mismatch repair deficient. 12. The method of claim 11 , wherein the biological sample is tumor tissue from the patient. 13. The method of claim 11 , wherein the biological sample is a body fluid from the patient. 14. The method of claim 11 , wherein the colorectal cancer is microsatellite instability high. 15. The method of claim 11 , wherein the colorectal cancer is DNA mismatch repair deficient. 16. The method of claim 11 , wherein the colorectal cancer is metastatic colorectal cancer. 17. The method of claim 11 , wherein the patient had received at least one prior cancer treatment and the cancer had progressed subsequent to the prior treatment. 18. The method of claim 11 , wherein the pembrolizumab is administered to the patient intravenously. 19. The method of claim 14 , wherein the biological sample was tested by a method comprising immunohistochemistry testing, next generation sequencing or PCR testing. 20. The method of claim 11 , wherein the biological sample was tested by a method comprising assessing one or more markers selected from the group consisting of BAT-25, BAT-26, MONO-27, NR-21 and NR-24. 21. The method of claim 1 , wherein the treatment increases the median progression free survival of patients having colorectal cancer that is microsatellite instability high or DNA mismatch repair deficient compared to the median progression free survival of patients having colorectal cancer that is not microsatellite instability high or DNA mismatch repair deficient. 22. The method of claim 1 , wherein the treatment increases the median overall survival of patients having colorectal cancer that is microsatellite instability high or DNA mismatch repair deficient compared to the median overall survival of patients having colorectal cancer that is not microsatellite instability high or DNA mismatch repair deficient. 23. The method of claim 11 wherein the treatment increases the median progression free survival of patients having colorectal cancer that is microsatellite instability high or DNA mismatch repair deficient compared to the median progression free survival of patients having colorectal cancer that is not microsatellite instability high or DNA mismatch repair deficient. 24. The method of claim 11 , wherein the treatment increases the median overall survival of patients having colorectal cancer that is microsatellite instability high or DNA mismatch repair deficient compared to the median overall survival of patients having colorectal cancer that is not microsatellite instability high or DNA mismatch repair deficient. 25. The method of claim 1 , wherein the method results in an objective response rate of 40% or higher for microsatellite instability high or DNA mismatch repair deficient colorectal cancer patients. 26. The method of claim 25 , wherein the microsatellite instability high or DNA mismatch repair deficient colorectal cancer patients have received a prior cancer therapy drug and the cancer had progressed following the prior cancer therapy. 27. The method of claim 1 , wherein the method results in a probability of progression-free survival at 20 weeks for microsatellite instability high or DNA mismatch repair deficient colorectal cancer patients is at least 78%. 28. The method of claim 27 , wherein the microsatellite instability high or DNA mismatch repair deficient colorectal cancer patients have received a prior cancer therapy drug and the cancer had progressed following the prior cancer therapy. 29. The method of claim 1 , wherein the method results in a probability of progression-free survival at 9 months for microsatellite instability high or DNA mismatch repair deficient colorectal cancer patients is at least 60%. 30. The method of claim 29 , wherein the microsatellite instability high or DNA mismatch repair deficient colorectal cancer patients have received a prior cancer therapy drug and the cancer had progressed following the prior cancer therapy. 31. The method of claim 6 , wherein the method results in an objective response rate of 40% or higher for microsatellite instability high or DNA mismatch repair deficient colorectal cancer patients. 32. The method of claim 31 , wherein the microsatellite instability high or DNA mismatch repair deficient colorectal cancer patients have received a prior cancer therapy drug and the cancer had progressed following the prior cancer therapy. 33. The method of claim 6 , wherein the method results in a probability of progression-free survival at 20 weeks for microsatellite instability high or DNA mismatch repair deficient colorectal cancer patients is at least 78%. 34. The method of claim 33 , wherein the microsatellite instability high or DNA mismatch repair deficient colorectal cancer patients have received a prior cancer therapy drug and the cancer had progressed following the prior cancer therapy. 35. The method of claim 6 , wherein the method results in a probability of progression-free survival at 9 months for microsatellite instability high or DNA mismatch rep

Assignees

Inventors

Classifications

  • for cancer (immunoassay for cancer G01N33/575) · CPC title

  • Pharmacogenomics, i.e. genetic variability in individual responses to drugs and drug metabolism · CPC title

  • containing regions, domains or residues from different species, e.g. chimeric, humanized or veneered · CPC title

  • against the immunoglobulin superfamily · CPC title

  • Polymorphic or mutational markers · CPC title

Patent family

Related publications grouped by family.

External sources

Frequently asked questions

Answers are generated from the same data shown on this page.

What does patent US11649287B2 cover?
Blockade of immune checkpoints such as cytotoxic T-lymphocyte antigen-4 (CTLA-4) and programmed death-1 (PD-1) shows promise in patients with cancer. Inhibitory antibodies directed at these receptors have been shown to break immune tolerance and promote anti-tumor immunity. These agents work particularly well in patients with a certain category of tumor. Such tumors may be particularly suscepti…
Who is the assignee on this patent?
Univ Johns Hopkins
What technology area does this patent fall under?
Primary CPC classification C07K16/2803. Mapped technology areas include Chemistry & Metallurgy.
When was this patent published?
Publication date Tue May 16 2023 00:00:00 GMT+0000 (Coordinated Universal Time) (B2). Legal status and post-grant events are not shown on this page.
What related patents are in patentsdb?
We list 10 related publications on this page (citations in our corpus or others sharing the same primary CPC).