Checkpoint blockade and microsatellite instability
US-11339219-B2 · May 24, 2022 · US
US11649287B2 · US · B2
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Publication number | US-11649287-B2 |
| Application number | US-202117465096-A |
| Country | US |
| Kind code | B2 |
| Filing date | Sep 2, 2021 |
| Priority date | Nov 13, 2014 |
| Publication date | May 16, 2023 |
| Grant date | May 16, 2023 |
A practical reading order for non-experts. Skip the full description unless you need deep technical detail.
What the patent document calls the invention.
A short plain-language summary of the technical disclosure.
Who owns or filed the patent and who is credited as inventor.
Filing, priority, publication, and grant dates set the timeline.
The legal scope of protection — read this for what is actually claimed.
Technology tags used to group this patent with similar filings.
Prior art links and similar publications in this corpus.
Official abstract text for this publication.
Blockade of immune checkpoints such as cytotoxic T-lymphocyte antigen-4 (CTLA-4) and programmed death-1 (PD-1) shows promise in patients with cancer. Inhibitory antibodies directed at these receptors have been shown to break immune tolerance and promote anti-tumor immunity. These agents work particularly well in patients with a certain category of tumor. Such tumors may be particularly susceptible to treatment because of the multitude of neoantigens which they produce.
Opening claim text (preview).
We claim: 1. A method for treating colorectal cancer in a human patient, the method comprising: in response to determining that the colorectal cancer is microsatellite instability high or DNA mismatch repair deficient, treating a human patient having colorectal cancer that is microsatellite instability high or DNA mismatch repair deficient with a therapeutically effective amount of pembrolizumab, wherein a biological sample from the patient had previously been tested to determine whether the colorectal cancer is microsatellite instability high or DNA mismatch repair deficient. 2. The method of claim 1 , wherein the biological sample is tumor tissue from the patient. 3. The method of claim 1 , wherein the biological sample is a body fluid from the patient. 4. The method of claim 1 , wherein the colorectal cancer is microsatellite instability high. 5. The method of claim 1 , wherein the colorectal cancer is DNA mismatch repair deficient. 6. The method of claim 1 , wherein the colorectal cancer is metastatic colorectal cancer. 7. The method of claim 1 , wherein the patient had received at least one prior cancer treatment and the cancer had progressed subsequent to the prior treatment. 8. The method of claim 1 , wherein the pembrolizumab is administered to the patient intravenously. 9. The method of claim 4 , wherein the biological sample was tested by a method comprising immunohistochemistry testing, next generation sequencing or PCR testing. 10. The method of claim 1 , wherein the biological sample was tested by a method comprising assessing one or more markers selected from the group consisting of BAT-25, BAT-26, MONO-27, NR-21 and NR-24. 11. A method for reducing the risk of progression of colorectal cancer in a human patient, the method comprising: in response to determining that the colorectal cancer is microsatellite instability high or DNA mismatch repair deficient, treating a human patient having colorectal cancer that is microsatellite instability high or DNA mismatch repair deficient with a therapeutically effective amount of pembrolizumab, wherein a biological sample from the patient had previously been tested to determine whether the colorectal cancer is microsatellite instability high or DNA mismatch repair deficient. 12. The method of claim 11 , wherein the biological sample is tumor tissue from the patient. 13. The method of claim 11 , wherein the biological sample is a body fluid from the patient. 14. The method of claim 11 , wherein the colorectal cancer is microsatellite instability high. 15. The method of claim 11 , wherein the colorectal cancer is DNA mismatch repair deficient. 16. The method of claim 11 , wherein the colorectal cancer is metastatic colorectal cancer. 17. The method of claim 11 , wherein the patient had received at least one prior cancer treatment and the cancer had progressed subsequent to the prior treatment. 18. The method of claim 11 , wherein the pembrolizumab is administered to the patient intravenously. 19. The method of claim 14 , wherein the biological sample was tested by a method comprising immunohistochemistry testing, next generation sequencing or PCR testing. 20. The method of claim 11 , wherein the biological sample was tested by a method comprising assessing one or more markers selected from the group consisting of BAT-25, BAT-26, MONO-27, NR-21 and NR-24. 21. The method of claim 1 , wherein the treatment increases the median progression free survival of patients having colorectal cancer that is microsatellite instability high or DNA mismatch repair deficient compared to the median progression free survival of patients having colorectal cancer that is not microsatellite instability high or DNA mismatch repair deficient. 22. The method of claim 1 , wherein the treatment increases the median overall survival of patients having colorectal cancer that is microsatellite instability high or DNA mismatch repair deficient compared to the median overall survival of patients having colorectal cancer that is not microsatellite instability high or DNA mismatch repair deficient. 23. The method of claim 11 wherein the treatment increases the median progression free survival of patients having colorectal cancer that is microsatellite instability high or DNA mismatch repair deficient compared to the median progression free survival of patients having colorectal cancer that is not microsatellite instability high or DNA mismatch repair deficient. 24. The method of claim 11 , wherein the treatment increases the median overall survival of patients having colorectal cancer that is microsatellite instability high or DNA mismatch repair deficient compared to the median overall survival of patients having colorectal cancer that is not microsatellite instability high or DNA mismatch repair deficient. 25. The method of claim 1 , wherein the method results in an objective response rate of 40% or higher for microsatellite instability high or DNA mismatch repair deficient colorectal cancer patients. 26. The method of claim 25 , wherein the microsatellite instability high or DNA mismatch repair deficient colorectal cancer patients have received a prior cancer therapy drug and the cancer had progressed following the prior cancer therapy. 27. The method of claim 1 , wherein the method results in a probability of progression-free survival at 20 weeks for microsatellite instability high or DNA mismatch repair deficient colorectal cancer patients is at least 78%. 28. The method of claim 27 , wherein the microsatellite instability high or DNA mismatch repair deficient colorectal cancer patients have received a prior cancer therapy drug and the cancer had progressed following the prior cancer therapy. 29. The method of claim 1 , wherein the method results in a probability of progression-free survival at 9 months for microsatellite instability high or DNA mismatch repair deficient colorectal cancer patients is at least 60%. 30. The method of claim 29 , wherein the microsatellite instability high or DNA mismatch repair deficient colorectal cancer patients have received a prior cancer therapy drug and the cancer had progressed following the prior cancer therapy. 31. The method of claim 6 , wherein the method results in an objective response rate of 40% or higher for microsatellite instability high or DNA mismatch repair deficient colorectal cancer patients. 32. The method of claim 31 , wherein the microsatellite instability high or DNA mismatch repair deficient colorectal cancer patients have received a prior cancer therapy drug and the cancer had progressed following the prior cancer therapy. 33. The method of claim 6 , wherein the method results in a probability of progression-free survival at 20 weeks for microsatellite instability high or DNA mismatch repair deficient colorectal cancer patients is at least 78%. 34. The method of claim 33 , wherein the microsatellite instability high or DNA mismatch repair deficient colorectal cancer patients have received a prior cancer therapy drug and the cancer had progressed following the prior cancer therapy. 35. The method of claim 6 , wherein the method results in a probability of progression-free survival at 9 months for microsatellite instability high or DNA mismatch rep
for cancer (immunoassay for cancer G01N33/575) · CPC title
Pharmacogenomics, i.e. genetic variability in individual responses to drugs and drug metabolism · CPC title
containing regions, domains or residues from different species, e.g. chimeric, humanized or veneered · CPC title
against the immunoglobulin superfamily · CPC title
Polymorphic or mutational markers · CPC title
Related publications grouped by family.
Answers are generated from the same data shown on this page.