Method for the design and efficient manufacture of fiber-composite parts
US-10800115-B2 · Oct 13, 2020 · US
US11645432B2 · US · B2
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Publication number | US-11645432-B2 |
| Application number | US-202217713062-A |
| Country | US |
| Kind code | B2 |
| Filing date | Apr 4, 2022 |
| Priority date | Oct 26, 2018 |
| Publication date | May 9, 2023 |
| Grant date | May 9, 2023 |
A practical reading order for non-experts. Skip the full description unless you need deep technical detail.
What the patent document calls the invention.
A short plain-language summary of the technical disclosure.
Who owns or filed the patent and who is credited as inventor.
Filing, priority, publication, and grant dates set the timeline.
The legal scope of protection — read this for what is actually claimed.
Technology tags used to group this patent with similar filings.
Prior art links and similar publications in this corpus.
Official abstract text for this publication.
A method for designing fiber-composite parts in which part performance and manufacturing efficiency can be traded-off against one another to provide an “optimized” design for a desired use case. In some embodiments, the method involves generating an idealized fiber map, wherein the orientation of fibers throughout the prospective part align with the anticipated load conditions throughout the part, and then modifying the idealized fiber map by various fabrication constraints to generate a process-compensated preform map.
Opening claim text (preview).
What is claimed: 1. A method for the design of a fiber-composite part formed by molding feed constituents that include, primarily, resin-infused fiber bundles having a circular or oval cross section, the method comprising: determining a relationship between an indicia of performance of the fiber-composite part and a first design constraint of the fiber-composite part, wherein a variation in the first design constraint results in a variation in fabrication-process efficiency of the fiber-composite part, and wherein the relationship is determined by: (a) defining a plurality of design constraints, including the first design constraint, applicable to fabrication of the fiber-composite part, (b) molding plural instances of the fiber-composite part based on the plurality of design constraints and based on varying, for at least some of the plural instances, at least the first design constraint within a range of values, (c) testing each instance of the fiber-composite part to determine a value for the indicia of performance; and selecting, from the determined relationship, a value of the first design constraint within the range as a basis for the design of the fiber-composite part. 2. The method of claim 1 wherein the range of values of the first design constraint includes (i) a first value at which the fiber-composite part exhibits a maxima in the indicia of performance and (ii) a second value at which indicia of performance falls below an acceptable value. 3. The method of claim 2 wherein selecting comprises selecting, as a design for the fiber-composite part, the first value of the first design constraint, thereby providing a design that prioritizes part performance over fabrication efficiency. 4. The method of claim 2 wherein selecting comprises selecting, as a design for the fiber-composite part, the second value of the first design constraint, thereby providing a design that prioritizes fabrication efficiency over part performance. 5. The method of claim 1 comprising forming, via compression molding, the fiber-composite part based on the selected value of the first design constraint. 6. The method of claim 1 wherein at least some of design constraints pertain to the resin-infused fiber bundles from which the fiber-composite part will be formed. 7. The method of claim 1 wherein at least some of design constraints pertain to a process by which the fiber-composite part is fabricated. 8. The method of claim 7 wherein the process is compression molding. 9. The method of claim 1 wherein fabricating comprises generating a first process-compensated preform map by applying, to idealized fiber paths for the fiber-composite part, the plural design constraints including a first value for the first design constraint within the range of values, wherein the first process-compensated preform map provides size, shape, orientation, and number of resin-infused fiber bundles that are required for fabricating a first of the instances of the fiber-composite part. 10. The method of claim 9 comprising generating a second process-compensated preform map by applying, to idealized fiber paths for the fiber-composite part, the plural design constraints including a second value for the first design constraint within the range of values, wherein the second process-compensated preform map provides size, shape, orientation, and number of resin-infused fiber bundles that are required for fabricating a second of the instances of the fiber-composite part. 11. The method of claim 10 wherein the value for the first design constraint is varied from the first value to the second value by applying a different weighting factor to the first design constraint. 12. The method of claim 11 wherein the weighting affects at least one of the size, shape, and orientation of the resin-infused fiber bundles appearing in the first process-compensated preform map. 13. A method for the design of a fiber-composite part formed by compression molding feed constituents that include, primarily, preforms having a circular or oval cross section, the method comprising: determining a relationship between an indicia of performance of the fiber-composite part and a first design constraint of the fiber-composite part, wherein a variation, over a range, in a value of the first design constraint results in a variation in fabrication-process efficiency of the fiber-composite part; and selecting, from the determined relationship, a value of the first design constraint as a basis for the design of the fiber-composite part; and molding the fiber-composite part by applying heat and pressure to a mold cavity containing the preforms, in accordance with compression molding protocols. 14. The method of claim 13 wherein the range of values of the first design constraint includes: (i) a first value at which the fiber-composite part exhibits a maxima in the indicia of performance and (ii) a second value at which indicia of performance falls below an acceptable value. 15. The method of claim 14 wherein selecting comprises selecting, as a design for the fiber-composite part, the first value of the first design constraint, thereby providing a design that prioritizes part performance over fabrication efficiency. 16. The method of claim 14 wherein selecting comprises selecting, as a design for the fiber-composite part, the second value of the first design constraint, thereby providing a design that prioritizes fabrication efficiency over part performance. 17. The method of claim 13 wherein molding the fiber-composite part comprises placing the preforms in the mold cavity in accordance with a process-compensated preform map that is generated using the selected value of the first design constraint, wherein the process-compensated preform map provides size, shape, orientation, and number of preforms that are required for molding the fiber-composite part.
Shaping by lay-up, i.e. applying fibres, tape or broadsheet on a mould, former or core; Shaping by spray-up, i.e. spraying of fibres on a mould, former or core · CPC title
Composites · CPC title
arranged in parallel planes or structures of fibres crossing at substantial angles, e.g. cross-moulding compound [XMC] (B29C70/207 takes precedence) · CPC title
Manufacturability analysis or optimisation for manufacturability · CPC title
Sheet material · CPC title
Related publications grouped by family.
Answers are generated from the same data shown on this page.