System for optimizing access to an indexed database
US-10592546-B2 · Mar 17, 2020 · US
US11620324B2 · US · B2
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Publication number | US-11620324-B2 |
| Application number | US-201916505274-A |
| Country | US |
| Kind code | B2 |
| Filing date | Jul 8, 2019 |
| Priority date | Sep 23, 2016 |
| Publication date | Apr 4, 2023 |
| Grant date | Apr 4, 2023 |
A practical reading order for non-experts. Skip the full description unless you need deep technical detail.
What the patent document calls the invention.
A short plain-language summary of the technical disclosure.
Who owns or filed the patent and who is credited as inventor.
Filing, priority, publication, and grant dates set the timeline.
The legal scope of protection — read this for what is actually claimed.
Technology tags used to group this patent with similar filings.
Prior art links and similar publications in this corpus.
Official abstract text for this publication.
An asset storage server is provided herein that assigns related files to an asset name and assigns permissions to the asset name such that related files with unrelated names can be assigned permissions independent of the file naming convention and without requiring a user to individually set the permissions of each file. The asset storage server may also generate modified versions of original file names and index a distributed object store based on the modified versions such that related files with related names are not listed in the same partition of the distributed object store. Indexing the distributed object store based on the modified versions of the original file names may reduce data retrieval latency.
Opening claim text (preview).
What is claimed is: 1. A computer-implemented method comprising: as implemented by one or more computing devices configured with specific executable instructions, receiving data associated with a first media object and a second media object to be stored, wherein the received data comprises a first name of the first media object, a second name of the second media object, and an indication of an asset name to which the first and second media objects are to be associated, wherein the first media object and the second media object are associated with the same content, and wherein the first media object uses a different file naming convention than the second media object that prevents a batch operation from being applied to both the first and second media objects without use of the asset name; mapping the first name of the first media object to the asset name and the second name of the second media object to the asset name; storing the mapping of the first name of the first media object to the asset name and the mapping of the second name of the second media object to the asset name in a data store; and performing the batch operation on the first media object and the second media object using the asset name to assign a permission to the first and second media objects. 2. The computer-implemented method of claim 1 further comprising: receiving a request from an asset owner device to modify permissions of the asset name based on a second permission; mapping the asset name to the second permission; and storing the mapping of the asset name to the second permission in the data store. 3. The computer-implemented method of claim 1 , wherein the first media object comprises one of a movie file, a television show file, a music video file, or an audio book file. 4. A system comprising: a data store configured to store associated with a first media object and a second media object; and an asset storage system comprising a processor and memory, wherein the memory includes instructions that, when executed by the processor, cause the asset storage system to: receive data associated with the first media object and the second media object, wherein the received data comprises a first name of the first media object, a second name of the second media object, and an indication of an asset name to which the first media object and the second media object are to be associated, wherein the first media object and the second media object are associated with the same content, and wherein the first media object uses a different file naming convention than the second media object that prevents a batch operation from being applied to both the first and second media objects without use of the asset name; map the first name of the first media object and the second name of the second media object to the asset name; store the mapping of the first name of the first media object to the asset name in the data store; and perform the batch operation on the first and second media objects using the asset name. 5. The system of claim 4 further comprising an asset retrieval server, wherein second instructions, when executed, cause the asset retrieval server to: receive a request from a user device to access the first media object; query, using the first name of the first media object, the data store to identify that the asset name is mapped to the first name of the first media object; determine that a user associated with the user device is authorized to access the first media object; retrieve the first media object; and transmit the first media object to the user device to satisfy the request. 6. The system of claim 4 , wherein the instructions, when executed by the processor, further cause the asset storage system to: receive a second request from an asset owner device to modify permissions of the asset name based on a permission; map the asset name to the permission; and store the mapping of the asset name to the permission. 7. The system of claim 6 , wherein the second request comprises a time parameter that indicates an expiration of the permission. 8. The system of claim 6 , wherein the permission comprises at least one of read access granted to the user, write access granted to the user, delete access granted to the user, or update metadata access granted to the user. 9. The system of claim 4 , wherein the instructions, when executed by the processor, further cause the asset storage system to update permissions of the asset name in response to an occurrence of an event. 10. The system of claim 9 , wherein the event comprises one of storage of a third media object, an expiration of the set of permissions, or a modification of the first media object. 11. The system of claim 4 , wherein the instructions, when executed by the processor, further cause the asset storage system to execute a second batch operation to move the first media object, the second media object, and any other media object mapped to the asset name from a first storage tier to a second storage tier. 12. The system of claim 4 , wherein the first media object comprises one of a movie file, a television show file, a music video file, or an audio book file. 13. A non-transitory computer-readable medium having stored thereon executable program code that directs one or more computing devices to perform operations when executed, the operations comprising: receiving data associated with a first media object and a second media object, wherein the received data comprises a first name of the first media object, a second name of the second media object, and an indication of an asset name to which the first media object and second media object are to be associated, wherein the first media object and the second media object are associated with the same content, and wherein the first media object uses a different file naming convention than the second media object that prevents a batch operation from being applied to both the first and second media objects without use of the asset name; mapping the first name of the first media object and the second name of the second media object to the asset name; storing the mapping of the first name of the first media object to the asset name; and performing the batch operation on the first and second media objects using the asset name. 14. The non-transitory computer-readable medium of claim 13 , wherein the operations further comprise: receiving a second request to modify permissions of the asset name based on a permission; mapping the asset name to the permission; and storing the mapping of the asset name to the permission. 15. The non-transitory computer-readable medium of claim 14 , wherein the second request comprises a time parameter that indicates an expiration of the permission. 16. The non-transitory computer-readable medium of claim 14 , wherein the operations further comprise updating permissions of the asset name in response to an occurrence of an event. 17. The non-transitory computer-readable medium of claim 16 , wherein the event comprises one of storage of a third media object, an expiration of the permission, or a modification of the first media object. 18. The non-transitory computer-readable medium of claim 14 , wherein the permission comprises at least one of read access granted to a user, write access granted to the user, delete access granted to the user, or update metadata access granted to the user. 19. The non-transitory computer-readable medium of claim 13 , wherein the operations further comprise executing a second batch o
Indexing; Web crawling techniques · CPC title
Retrieval characterised by using metadata, e.g. metadata not derived from the content or metadata generated manually · CPC title
Presentation of query results · CPC title
Related publications grouped by family.
Answers are generated from the same data shown on this page.