System and method for recommending semantically similar items
US-2018039910-A1 · Feb 8, 2018 · US
US11604980B2 · US · B2
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Publication number | US-11604980-B2 |
| Application number | US-201916419651-A |
| Country | US |
| Kind code | B2 |
| Filing date | May 22, 2019 |
| Priority date | May 22, 2019 |
| Publication date | Mar 14, 2023 |
| Grant date | Mar 14, 2023 |
A practical reading order for non-experts. Skip the full description unless you need deep technical detail.
What the patent document calls the invention.
A short plain-language summary of the technical disclosure.
Who owns or filed the patent and who is credited as inventor.
Filing, priority, publication, and grant dates set the timeline.
The legal scope of protection — read this for what is actually claimed.
Technology tags used to group this patent with similar filings.
Prior art links and similar publications in this corpus.
Official abstract text for this publication.
A system includes: a memory operable to store a predictive model; a first processor communicatively coupled to the memory, the first processor operable to execute the predictive model to perform operations including generating knowledge score metrics based on a set of attributes for individuals included in a specified population, where the knowledge score metrics quantify a prediction of a capability of an individual for performing metadata labeling; a second processor communicatively coupled to the memory and the first processor, the second processor is operable to perform operations including comparing the knowledge score metrics to a specified threshold, and identifying attributes of individuals from a specified population having knowledge score metrics exceeding the specified threshold as attributes of individuals capable of performing metadata labeling.
Opening claim text (preview).
What is claimed is: 1. A method for generating seed input for an artificial intelligence system, the method comprising: collecting information on a set of attributes for each individual in an initial set of individuals; assessing a quality of metadata labels produced during a metadata labeling task performed by each individual in the initial set of individuals; evaluating, by a processor of the artificial intelligence system, the set of attributes and the quality of metadata labels produced during the metadata labeling task; based on results of the evaluating, associating quality metrics with the information on the set of attributes for each individual in the initial set of individuals; comparing, by the processor of the artificial intelligence system, the quality metrics to a threshold; in response to determining that a first quality metric of the quality metrics exceeds the threshold, identifying, by the processor of the artificial intelligence system, a subset of the set of attributes which is associated with the first quality metric as being attributes of an expert with respect to a type of data in a given data set; and inputting the subset of the set of attributes to a neural network processor to seed the artificial intelligence system to identify experts. 2. The method of claim 1 , further comprising: in response to determining that a second quality metric of the quality metrics does not exceed the threshold, inputting, to the neural network processor, a subset of the set of attributes which is associated with the second quality metric in a hold out set of training data for the artificial intelligence system. 3. The method of claim 1 , wherein the quality of the metadata labels produced during the metadata labeling task comprises an assessed degree of accuracy in defining an operational definition of elements of a given data set. 4. The method of claim 1 , wherein the set of attributes comprises one or more of: demographic data, education data, or data regarding a role within a company, and wherein the set of attributes indicates a degree of familiarity with a given data set. 5. The method of claim 1 , wherein at least some of the metadata labels produced during the metadata labeling task identify a technical description of data in a given data set. 6. The method of claim 1 , wherein at least some of the metadata labels produced during the metadata labeling task identify an operational description of data in a given data set. 7. The method of claim 1 , further comprising identifying training data for a plurality of different machine learning models, wherein each machine learning model of the plurality of different machine learning models is trained based on training data identified for a different type of data set. 8. A non-transitory computer readable medium storing instructions which, when executed by a processor of an artificial intelligence system, cause the processor to perform operations, the operations comprising: collecting information on a set of attributes for each individual in an initial set of individuals; assessing a quality of metadata labels produced during a metadata labeling task performed by each individual in the initial set of individuals; evaluating the set of attributes and the quality of metadata labels produced during the metadata labeling task; based on results of the evaluating, associating quality metrics with the information on the set of attributes for each individual in the initial set of individuals; comparing the quality metrics to a threshold; in response to determining that a first quality metric of the quality metrics exceeds the threshold, identifying a subset of the set of attributes which is associated with the first quality metric as being attributes of an expert with respect to a type of data in a given data set; and inputting the subset of the set of attributes to a neural network processor to seed the artificial intelligence system to identify experts. 9. The non-transitory computer readable medium of claim 8 , wherein the operations further comprise: in response to determining that a second quality metric of the quality metrics does not exceed the threshold, inputting, to the neural network processor, a subset of the set of attributes which is associated with the second quality metric in a hold out set of training data for the artificial intelligence system. 10. The non-transitory computer readable medium of claim 8 , wherein the quality of the metadata labels produced during the metadata labeling task comprises an assessed degree of accuracy in defining an operational definition of elements of a given data set. 11. The non-transitory computer readable medium of claim 8 , wherein the set of attributes comprises one or more of: demographic data, education data, or data regarding a role within a company, and wherein the set of attributes indicates a degree of familiarity with a given data set. 12. The non-transitory computer readable medium of claim 8 , wherein at least some of the metadata labels produced during the metadata labeling task identify a technical description of data in a given data set. 13. The non-transitory computer readable medium of claim 8 , wherein at least some of the metadata labels produced during the metadata labeling task identify an operational description of data in a given data set. 14. The non-transitory computer readable medium of claim 8 , wherein the operations further comprise: identifying training data for a plurality of different machine learning models, wherein each machine learning model of the plurality of different machine learning models is trained based on training data identified for a different type of data set. 15. An artificial intelligence system comprising: a processor; and a non-transitory computer readable medium storing instructions which, when executed by the processor, cause the processor to perform operations, the operations comprising: collecting information on a set of attributes for each individual in an initial set of individuals; assessing a quality of metadata labels produced during a metadata labeling task performed by each individual in the initial set of individuals; evaluating the set of attributes and the quality of metadata labels produced during the metadata labeling task; based on results of the evaluating, associating quality metrics with the information on the set of attributes for each individual in the initial set of individuals; comparing the quality metrics to a threshold; in response to determining that a first quality metric of the quality metrics exceeds the threshold, identifying a subset of the set of attributes which is associated with the first quality metric as being attributes of an expert with respect to a type of data in a given data set; and inputting the subset of the set of attributes to a neural network processor to seed the artificial intelligence system to identify experts. 16. The artificial intelligence system of claim 15 , wherein the operations further comprise: in response to determining that a second quality metric of the quality metrics does not exceed the threshold, inputting, to the neural network processor, a subset of the set of attributes which is associated with the second quality metric in a hold out set of training data for the artificial intelligence system. 17. The artificial intelligence system of claim 15 , wherein the quality of the metadata labels produced during the metadata labeling task comprises an assessed degree of accuracy in defining an operational definition of elements of a
Feedforward networks · CPC title
Supervised learning · CPC title
modifying the architecture, e.g. adding, deleting or silencing nodes or connections · CPC title
characterised by memory or gating, e.g. long short-term memory [LSTM] or gated recurrent units [GRU] · CPC title
Learning methods · CPC title
Related publications grouped by family.
Answers are generated from the same data shown on this page.