Flexible, extensible and automated systems and methods for scoring the quality of radiology examinations

US11600377B2 · US · B2

Patent metadata
FieldValue
Publication numberUS-11600377-B2
Application numberUS-202117389851-A
CountryUS
Kind codeB2
Filing dateJul 30, 2021
Priority dateMay 20, 2016
Publication dateMar 7, 2023
Grant dateMar 7, 2023

How to read this patent

A practical reading order for non-experts. Skip the full description unless you need deep technical detail.

  1. Title

    What the patent document calls the invention.

  2. Abstract

    A short plain-language summary of the technical disclosure.

  3. Assignees and inventors

    Who owns or filed the patent and who is credited as inventor.

  4. Key dates

    Filing, priority, publication, and grant dates set the timeline.

  5. First independent claim

    The legal scope of protection — read this for what is actually claimed.

  6. CPC / IPC classifications

    Technology tags used to group this patent with similar filings.

  7. Citations and related patents

    Prior art links and similar publications in this corpus.

Abstract

Official abstract text for this publication.

The present disclosure relates to automated systems and methods which assess the quality of radiology examinations and identify actionable changes to improve the quality of future exams. For each of a plurality of imaging studies, a study protocol and set of study metrics can be defined and the defined study protocol can be performed to generate data associated with the imaging study. A metrics assessment can be performed by applying at least a portion of the data associated with the result of the imaging study against the set of study metrics for the imaging study so as to generate a metrics score for the imaging study. The metrics scores can be stored in a score repository and analyzed so as to provide recommendations to improve the examination process.

First claim

Opening claim text (preview).

The invention claimed is: 1. A method, comprising: for each of a plurality of imaging studies, defining a study protocol comprising a set of criteria regarding how to conduct the imaging study using one of (i) a scanner and (ii) an injector and scanner; for each of the plurality of imaging studies, defining a set of study metrics; for each of the plurality of imaging studies, performing the defined study protocol so as to generate data associated with a result of the imaging study; for each of the plurality of imaging studies, performing a metrics assessment by applying at least a portion of the data associated with the result of the imaging study against the set of study metrics for the imaging study so as to generate a metrics score for the imaging study, wherein the metrics score for each of the plurality of imaging studies is stored in a score repository; aggregating the metrics scores for the plurality of imaging studies to generate an aggregated metrics score; for each of the plurality of imaging studies, performing an updated metrics assessment, comprising selecting an updated value for at least one of the study metrics and applying at least a portion of the data associated with the result of the imaging study against the updated value so as to generate an updated metrics score for the imaging study; aggregating the updated metrics scores for the plurality of imaging studies to generate an updated aggregated metrics score; reviewing the aggregated metrics score and updated aggregated metrics score; based on the review of the aggregated metrics score and updated aggregated metrics score, generating at least one updated study protocol-comprising an updated set of criteria regarding how to conduct an imaging study using the one of (i) a scanner and (ii) an injector and a scanner; and performing a subsequent imaging study based upon the at least one updated study protocol so as to generate data associated with a result of the subsequent imaging study. 2. The method of claim 1 , wherein the set of study metrics comprises a list of quantifiable characteristics of the study and the results thereof. 3. The method of claim 1 , wherein defining the set of study metrics comprises selecting a plurality of study metrics from a list of available study metrics. 4. The method of claim 3 , wherein defining the set of study metrics further comprises providing, for each of the plurality of study metrics, a metric evaluation criteria. 5. The method of claim 1 , wherein reviewing the aggregated metrics score and updated aggregated metrics score comprises reviewing a visually perceptible summary of the aggregated metrics score and updated aggregated metrics score. 6. The method of claim 1 , wherein the plurality of imaging studies are selected from the group consisting of computerized tomography imaging studies, positron emission tomography imaging studies, molecular imaging studies, ultrasound imaging studies, and magnetic resonance imaging studies. 7. A method, comprising: receiving, at a score repository, data related to a plurality of imaging studies, wherein the data related to the plurality of imaging studies comprises, for each of the plurality of imaging studies, a study protocol comprising a set of criteria regarding how to conduct the imaging study using one of (i) a scanner and (ii) an injector and a scanner, a set of study metrics, and data associated with a result of performing the study protocol for the imaging study; performing a metrics assessment for each of the plurality of imaging studies by applying at least a portion of the data associated with the result of the imaging study against the set of study metrics for the imaging study so as to generate a metrics score for the imaging study; receiving a visually perceptible summary of the metrics score for at least one of the plurality of imaging studies; and presenting, on one or more display screens, the visually perceptible summary of the metrics score for the at least one of the plurality of imaging studies; generating an aggregate of the metrics scores comprised of a plurality of the metrics scores; receiving a visually perceptible summary of the aggregate of the metrics scores; presenting, on one or more display screens, the visually perceptible summary of the aggregate of metrics scores; receiving a request to modify one or more of the study metrics used to generate one or more of the metrics scores included in the aggregate of the metrics scores; generating one or more updated metrics scores by applying at least a portion of the data associated with the result of the imaging study against at least the one or more modified study metrics; generating an updated aggregate of the metrics scores comprised of at least the updated metrics scores; based on the aggregate of the metrics scores and the updated aggregate of the metrics scores, generating at least one updated study protocol comprising an updated set of criteria regarding how to conduct an imaging study using the one of (i) a scanner and (ii) an injector and a scanner; and performing a subsequent imaging study based upon the at least one updated study protocol so as to generate data associated with a result of the subsequent imaging study. 8. The method of claim 7 , further comprising: receiving a visually perceptible summary of the updated aggregate of the metrics scores; and presenting, on one or more display screens, the visually perceptible summary of the updated aggregate of the metrics scores. 9. The method of claim 7 , wherein the set of study metrics comprises a list of quantifiable characteristics of the study and the results thereof. 10. The method of claim 7 , wherein the visually perceptible summary of the metrics score comprises a set of binary indicators, wherein each binary indicator is associated with a study metric. 11. A system, comprising: one of (i) a scanner and (ii) an injector and a scanner; one or more protocol units, wherein each of the protocol units has associated therewith a non-transitory, computer readable medium containing a set of programming instructions that, when executed by a processor, permit the protocol unit to define, for each of a plurality of imaging studies, a study protocol and a set of study metrics, wherein the study protocol comprises a set of criteria regarding how to conduct an imaging study using the one of (i) a scanner and (ii) an injector and a scanner; a score repository comprising a set of database entries, wherein each database entry is associated with one of the plurality of imaging studies and comprises the study protocol for the imaging study, the set of study metrics for the imaging study, and data associated with a result of performing the study protocol for the imaging study; one or more scoring units, wherein each of the scoring units has associated therewith a non-transitory, computer readable medium containing a set of programming instructions that, when executed by a processor, permit the scoring unit to perform, for each of the plurality of imaging studies, a metrics assessment by applying at least a portion of the data associated with the result of the imaging study against the set of study metrics for the imaging study so as to generate a metrics score for the imaging study, wherein the programming instructions, when executed by a processor, further permit the scoring unit to aggregate the metrics scores for the plurality of imaging studies to generate an aggregated metrics score, receive an updated value for at least one of the study metrics, apply, for each of the plurality of imaging studies, at least a portion of the data associated with the result of the imaging study against the updated val

Assignees

Inventors

Classifications

  • for mining of medical data, e.g. analysing previous cases of other patients · CPC title

  • for electronic clinical trials or questionnaires · CPC title

  • for processing medical images, e.g. editing · CPC title

  • G16H30/20Primary

    for handling medical images, e.g. DICOM, HL7 or PACS · CPC title

Patent family

Related publications grouped by family.

External sources

Frequently asked questions

Answers are generated from the same data shown on this page.

What does patent US11600377B2 cover?
The present disclosure relates to automated systems and methods which assess the quality of radiology examinations and identify actionable changes to improve the quality of future exams. For each of a plurality of imaging studies, a study protocol and set of study metrics can be defined and the defined study protocol can be performed to generate data associated with the imaging study. A metrics…
Who is the assignee on this patent?
Bayer Healthcare Llc
What technology area does this patent fall under?
Primary CPC classification G16H30/20. Mapped technology areas include Physics.
When was this patent published?
Publication date Tue Mar 07 2023 00:00:00 GMT+0000 (Coordinated Universal Time) (B2). Legal status and post-grant events are not shown on this page.
What related patents are in patentsdb?
We list 5 related publications on this page (citations in our corpus or others sharing the same primary CPC).