Control tower and enterprise management platform for value chain networks
US-2021357959-A1 · Nov 18, 2021 · US
US11599753B2 · US · B2
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Publication number | US-11599753-B2 |
| Application number | US-201715844991-A |
| Country | US |
| Kind code | B2 |
| Filing date | Dec 18, 2017 |
| Priority date | Dec 18, 2017 |
| Publication date | Mar 7, 2023 |
| Grant date | Mar 7, 2023 |
A practical reading order for non-experts. Skip the full description unless you need deep technical detail.
What the patent document calls the invention.
A short plain-language summary of the technical disclosure.
Who owns or filed the patent and who is credited as inventor.
Filing, priority, publication, and grant dates set the timeline.
The legal scope of protection — read this for what is actually claimed.
Technology tags used to group this patent with similar filings.
Prior art links and similar publications in this corpus.
Official abstract text for this publication.
Embodiments generate a model of demand of a product that includes an optimized feature set. Embodiments receive sales history for the product and receive a set of relevant features for the product and designate a subset of the relevant features as mandatory features. From the sales history, embodiments form a training dataset and a validation dataset and randomly select from the set of relevant features one or more optional features. Embodiments include the selected optional features with the mandatory features to create a feature test set. Embodiments train an algorithm using the training dataset and the feature test set to generate a trained algorithm and calculate an early stopping metric using the trained algorithm and the validation dataset. When the early stopping metric is below a predefined threshold, the feature test set is the optimized feature set.
Opening claim text (preview).
What is claimed is: 1. A method of generating a model of demand of a product that comprises an optimized feature set, the method comprising: receiving sales history for the product; receiving a set of relevant features for the product and designating a subset of the relevant features as mandatory features; from the sales history, forming a training dataset and a validation dataset; randomly selecting, from the set of relevant features, one or more optional features to create a set of optional features and including the set of optional features with the mandatory features to create a first feature test set; training an algorithm using the training dataset and the first feature test set to generate a trained algorithm; calculating an early stopping metric using the trained algorithm and the validation dataset; repeating the randomly selecting to create a revised feature test set, the revised feature test set comprising the mandatory feature set and a different set of optional features than the first feature test set; repeating the training and calculating using the revised feature test set instead of the first feature test set; and repeating the repeating the randomly selecting and the repeating the training and calculating until the early stopping metric is below a predefined threshold; wherein when the early stopping metric is below the predefined threshold, the revised feature test set is the optimized feature set. 2. The method of claim 1 , further comprising repeating the method to generate a plurality of optimized feature sets, where each of the optimized feature sets are input into a forecasting algorithm to generate a trained model. 3. The method of claim 1 , wherein the forming the training dataset and the validation dataset comprises randomly selecting a first subset of the sales history as the training dataset, and using a remainder of the sales history as the validation dataset. 4. The method of claim 1 , wherein the algorithm comprises a machine learning algorithm that comprises one of linear regression, Support Vector Machine, or Artificial Neural Networks. 5. The method of claim 1 , wherein the early stopping metric comprises a mean absolute percentage error. 6. The method of claim 2 , further comprising: training multiple models corresponding to the optimized feature sets using a training set, and using a corresponding validation set to validate each trained model and calculate an error; calculating model weights for each model; outputting a model combination comprising for each model a forecast and a weight; and generating a forecast of future sales based on the model combination. 7. The method of claim 6 , wherein the error is a root-mean-square error (RMSE) and for each model of each training set i, the calculating model weights w(i) comprises: w ( i ) = 1 1 + RMSE ( i ) . 8. A non-transitory computer-readable medium having instructions stored thereon that, when executed by a-one or more processors, cause the processors to generate a model of demand of a product that comprises an optimized feature set, the generating comprising: receiving sales history for the product; receiving a set of relevant features for the product and designating a subset of the relevant features as mandatory features; from the sales history, forming a training dataset and a validation dataset; randomly selecting, from the set of relevant features, one or more optional features to create a set of optional features and including the set of optional features with the mandatory features to create a first feature test set; training an algorithm using the training dataset and the first feature test set to generate a trained algorithm; calculating an early stopping metric using the trained algorithm and the validation dataset; repeating the randomly selecting to create a revised feature test set, the revised feature test set comprising the mandatory feature set and a different set of optional features than the first feature test set; repeating the training and calculating using the revised feature test set instead of the first feature test set; and repeating the repeating the randomly selecting and the repeating the training and calculating until the early stopping metric is below a predefined threshold; wherein when the early stopping metric is below the predefined threshold, the revised feature test set is the optimized feature set. 9. The computer-readable medium of claim 8 , the generating further comprising repeating the generating to generate a plurality of optimized feature sets, where each of the optimized feature sets are input into a forecasting algorithm to generate a trained model. 10. The computer-readable medium of claim 8 , wherein the forming the training dataset and the validation dataset comprises randomly selecting a first subset of the sales history as the training dataset, and using a remainder of the sales history as the validation dataset. 11. The computer-readable medium of claim 8 , wherein the algorithm comprises a machine learning algorithm that comprises one of linear regression, Support Vector Machine, or Artificial Neural Networks. 12. The computer-readable medium of claim 8 , wherein the early stopping metric comprises a mean absolute percentage error. 13. The computer-readable medium of claim 9 , further comprising: training multiple models corresponding to the optimized feature sets using a training set, and using a corresponding validation set to validate each trained model and calculate an error; calculating model weights for each model; outputting a model combination comprising for each model a forecast and a weight; and generating a forecast of future sales based on the model combination. 14. The computer-readable medium of claim 13 , wherein the error is a root-mean-square error (RMSE) and for each model of each training set i, the calculating model weights w(i) comprises: w ( i ) = 1 1 + RMSE ( i ) . 15. A retail sales forecasting system that forecasts demand for a product using an optimized feature set, the system comprising: one or morea processors coupled to a storage device that implements a demand forecasting module comprising: receiving sales history for the product; receiving a set of relevant features for the product and
Market predictions or forecasting for commercial activities · CPC title
based on the proximity to a decision surface, e.g. support vector machines · CPC title
Validation; Performance evaluation; Active pattern learning techniques · CPC title
Complex mathematical operations {(function generation by table look-up G06F1/03; evaluation of elementary functions by calculation G06F7/544)} · CPC title
Detection or correction of errors, e.g. by rescanning the pattern or by human intervention; Evaluation of the quality of the acquired patterns · CPC title
Related publications grouped by family.
Answers are generated from the same data shown on this page.