Method and system for assessing play value of a playground

Patent metadata

Field	Value
Publication number	US-11574271-B2
Application number	US-202117466905-A
Country	US
Kind code	B2
Filing date	Sep 3, 2021
Priority date	Jan 7, 2016
Publication date	Feb 7, 2023
Grant date	Feb 7, 2023

Abstract

The present invention provides methods and systems for determining the play value of a playground, the challenge level of a playground, or both. In some embodiments, the methods and systems may propose modifications to a playground that would result in an effective and efficient increase in the play value of the playground, a desired increase or decrease in the challenge level of the playground, or both. Further, in some embodiments, the methods and systems may be configured to provide comparisons of various playgrounds in order to determine which playgrounds are of greatest play value. In some embodiments, the methods and systems may be incorporated into software that is configured for the design of playgrounds.

First claim

What is claimed:

1. A method for designing or modifying an existing or prospective playground, the method comprising:
identifying, by at least one processor, one or more categories of physical play opportunities that are present in the existing or prospective playground;
identifying, by the at least one processor, for each category of physical play opportunity:
a total number of components in the existing or prospective playground within the category,
a number of unique components in the existing or prospective playground within the category, and
a challenge level of each unique component in the existing or prospective playground within the category;

determining and presenting at a display, by the at least one processor, a recommendation of one or more new components to be added to the existing or prospective playground based at least in part on an amount the new component increases the play value of the existing or prospective playground, wherein the play value is based at least in part on the total number of components within each category, the number of unique components within each category, and the challenge level of the components within each category;
receiving, by the at least one processor, a selection of at least one of the one or more new components to be added to the existing or prospective playground;
presenting in real-time at the display, by the at least one processor, (i) a three-dimensional rendering of the design of the existing or prospective playground modified to include the selected at least one of the one or more new components, (ii) the play value of the existing or prospective playground modified to include the selected at least one of the one or more new components, (iii) an increased amount in the play value of the existing or prospective playground modified to include the selected at least one of the one or more new components over the existing or prospective playground prior to the selection of the selected at least one of the one or more new components, or (iv) any combination of (i) through (iii).

2. The method of claim 1 , wherein determining, by the at least one processor, the play value of the existing or prospective playground comprises:
determining, by the at least one processor, a play value score for each identified category of physical play opportunity based on at least the total number of components, the number of unique components, and the challenge level of the components within each identified category; and
combining, by the at least one processor, the play value score for each identified category of physical play opportunity to assign the play value to the existing or prospective playground.

3. The method of claim 2 , wherein the challenge level of each unique component within the identified category of physical play opportunity are compared, by the at least one processor, to determine a number of unique challenge levels that are provided within the identified category.

4. The method of claim 3 , wherein a play value for each identified category of physical play opportunity is determined, by the at least one processor, by combining at least the total number of components within the identified category, the number of unique components within the identified category, and the number of unique challenge levels provided within the identified category.

5. The method of claim 1 , wherein the presenting at the display, by the at least one processor, one or more new components to be added to the existing or prospective playground is based at least in part on an effect each of the one or more new components will have on an overall challenge level of the existing or prospective playground, wherein the overall challenge level of the existing or prospective playground is based at least in part on the total number of components in the existing or prospective playground that fall within each challenge level.

6. The method of claim 1 , wherein the challenge level of each unique component within a category of physical play opportunity is based at least in part on a value assigned to each of a plurality of component descriptors within each of one or more challenge indicator factors.

7. The method of claim 6 , wherein the categories of physical play opportunities include a climbing category and wherein the one or more challenge indicator factors for the climbing category include one or more of the following: distance between risers, inclination, direction, stability of step, and height.

8. The method of claim 6 , wherein the categories of physical play opportunities include a spinning category and wherein the one or more challenge indicator factors for the spinning category include one or both of the following: body support and inclination.

9. The method of claim 6 , wherein the categories of physical play opportunities include a balancing category and wherein the one or more challenge indicator factors for the balancing category include one or more of the following: distance between steps, inclination, stability of step, grip/grasp, and height.

10. The method of claim 6 , wherein the categories of physical play opportunities include a sliding category and wherein the one or more challenge indicator factors for the sliding category include one or more of the following: direction, enclosure, and height.

11. The method of claim 6 , wherein the categories of physical play opportunities include a swinging category and wherein the one or more challenge indicator factors for the swinging category include one or more of the following: hanging point, seat, and swing types.

12. The method of claim 6 , wherein the categories of physical play opportunities include a crawling category and wherein the one or more challenge indicator factors for the crawling category include one or more of the following: inclination, direction, and enclosure.

13. The method of claim 1 , wherein the one or more categories of physical play opportunity comprise at least the following: climbing, spinning, rocking, balancing, sliding, swinging, crawling, and upper-body.

14. The method of claim 1 , further comprising identifying, by the at least one processor, a number of components that promote social play,
wherein assigning, by the at least one processor, a play value to the existing or prospective playground is based at least in part on the number of components that promote social play.

15. The method of claim 1 , further comprising:
identifying, by the at least one processor, one or more categories of cognitive play opportunities that are present in the existing or prospective playground;
identifying, by the at least one processor, for each identified category of cognitive play opportunity:
the total number of components in the existing or prospective playground within the category; and
the number of unique components in the existing or prospective playground within the category; and

wherein a play value of the existing or prospective playground is based at least in part on the total number of components and the number of unique components within each identified category of cognitive play opportunity.

16. The method of claim 15 , further comprising determining, by the at least one processor, a distribution between a play value of the one or more categories of physical play opportunities and a play value of the one or more categories of cognitive play opportunities; and
wherein the determining, by the at least one processor, one or more new components to be added to the existing or prospective playground is based at least in part on an effect each of the one or more new components will have on th

Assignees

• Cosco Nilda
• Monsur Muntazar
• Moore Robin C
• Hestenes Linda
• Sumrell Jennie
• Moore Lisa
• Playcore Wisconsin Inc
• Univ North Carolina State

Inventors

• Cosco Nilda
• Monsur Muntazar
• Moore Robin C
• Hestenes Linda
• Sumrell Jennie
• Moore Lisa

Classifications

• G06Q10/0637 Primary

  Strategic management or analysis, e.g. setting a goal or target of an organisation; Planning actions based on goals; Analysis or evaluation of effectiveness of goals · CPC title

• A63G31/00

  Amusement arrangements · CPC title