Accurate three-dimensional printing
US-10434573-B2 · Oct 8, 2019 · US
US11571740B2 · US · B2
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Publication number | US-11571740-B2 |
| Application number | US-202016821458-A |
| Country | US |
| Kind code | B2 |
| Filing date | Mar 17, 2020 |
| Priority date | Mar 17, 2020 |
| Publication date | Feb 7, 2023 |
| Grant date | Feb 7, 2023 |
A practical reading order for non-experts. Skip the full description unless you need deep technical detail.
What the patent document calls the invention.
A short plain-language summary of the technical disclosure.
Who owns or filed the patent and who is credited as inventor.
Filing, priority, publication, and grant dates set the timeline.
The legal scope of protection — read this for what is actually claimed.
Technology tags used to group this patent with similar filings.
Prior art links and similar publications in this corpus.
Official abstract text for this publication.
A computer representation of a printable product part and a plan for the printable product part to be deposited using an additive manufacturing process are received. The printable product part comprises an accumulation of material deposited by the additive manufacturing process. The plan comprises a tool-path representation of the printable product part and process parameters. A plurality of as-printed shapes of the printable product part are determined after it has been deposited according to the plan. Geometric differences between any of the plurality of as-printed shapes with the computer representation of the product part are determined.
Opening claim text (preview).
What is claimed is: 1. A method comprising: receiving a computer representation of a printable product part and a plan for the printable product part to be deposited using an additive manufacturing process, the printable product part comprising an accumulation of material deposited by the additive manufacturing process, the plan comprising a process parameter and a representation of a tool-path used in building the printable product part; determining a plurality of as-printed shapes of the printable product part after it has been deposited according to the plan, wherein determining the plurality of as-printed shapes comprises performing a plurality of physics informed simulations where uncertainty is introduced in the tool-path, wherein for each of the plurality of as printed shapes, the physics informed simulation comprises: for each deposition event of the plan, inputting an initial state of a distribution of liquid and solid phases into a feedforward neural network with physics informed loss and activation functions, the feedforward neural network outputting a spatial distribution of a substrate after the deposition event; and performing convolution of a kernel with the tool-path to obtain a spatial distribution of a solid phase of the as-printed shapes; determining geometric differences between any of the plurality of as-printed shapes with the computer representation of the product part; and using the geometric differences in the additive manufacturing process to build the printable product part with acceptable part quality. 2. The method of claim 1 , wherein the additive manufacturing process comprises a plurality of liquid metal droplets that coalesce and solidify according to the plan. 3. The method of claim 1 , further comprising determining a manufacturing error from the plurality of as-printed shapes of the product part based on a statistical analysis. 4. The method of claim 1 , further comprising determining the plurality of as-printed shapes based on at least one physical state of one or both of at least one deposited material and a substrate. 5. The method of claim 4 , wherein the at least one physical state comprises one or more of a spatial distribution of solid and liquid phases of the material, a spatial distribution of temperature, a pressure, and a flow velocity. 6. The method of claim 1 , comprising generating training data for the feedforward neural network using one or more of synthetically generated data and experimental data. 7. The method of claim 1 , comprising computing the difference between the computer representation of the product part and any or all of the as-printed shapes of the product part. 8. The method of claim 7 , further comprising displaying the geometric differences on a user interface. 9. The method according to claim 1 , wherein the kernel is estimated by training a convolutional neural network with a single convolutional layer. 10. A system, comprising: a processor; and a memory storing computer program instructions which when executed by the processor cause the processor to perform operations comprising: receiving a computer representation of a printable product part and a plan for the printable product part to be deposited using an additive manufacturing process, the printable product part comprising an accumulation of material deposited by the additive manufacturing process, the plan comprising a process parameter and a representation of a tool-path used in building the printable product part; determining a plurality of as-printed shapes of the printable product part after it has been deposited according to the plan, wherein determining the plurality of as-printed shapes comprises performing a plurality of physics informed simulations where uncertainty is introduced in the tool-path, wherein for each of the plurality of as printed shapes, the physics informed simulation comprises: for each deposition event of the plan, inputting an initial state of a distribution of liquid and solid phases into a feedforward neural network with physics informed loss and activation functions, the feedforward neural network outputting a spatial distribution of a substrate after the deposition event; and performing convolution of a kernel with the tool-path to obtain a spatial distribution of a solid phase of the as-printed shapes; and determining geometric differences between any of the plurality of as-printed shapes with the computer representation of the product part, the geometric differences being used in the additive manufacturing process to build the printable product part with acceptable part quality. 11. The system of claim 10 , wherein receiving the plan for the printable product part comprises receiving at least one of a multi-physics model and a machine learning model as a surrogate for the multi-physics model. 12. The system of claim 10 , further comprising a user interface configured to display to geometric differences. 13. The system of claim 10 , wherein the additive manufacturing process comprises a plurality of liquid metal droplets that coalesce and solidify according to the plan. 14. The system of claim 10 , wherein the processor is further configured to determine a manufacturing error from the plurality of as-printed shapes of the product part based on a statistical analysis. 15. The system of claim 10 , wherein the processor is further configured to determine the plurality of as-printed shapes based on at least one physical state of one or both of at least one deposited material and a substrate. 16. The system of claim 15 , wherein the at least one physical state comprises one or more of a spatial distribution of solid and liquid phases of the material, a spatial distribution of temperature, a pressure, and a flow velocity. 17. The system of claim 15 , wherein each of the plurality of as-printed shapes comprise a spatial distribution of a solid phase of the as-printed shapes. 18. A non-transitory computer readable medium storing computer program instructions, the computer program instructions when executed by a processor cause the processor to perform operations comprising: receiving a computer representation of a printable product part and a plan for the printable product part to be deposited using an additive manufacturing process, the printable product part comprising an accumulation of material deposited by the additive manufacturing process, the plan comprising a process parameter and a representation of a tool-path used in building the printable product part; determining a plurality of as-printed shapes of the printable product part after it has been deposited according to the plan, wherein determining the plurality of as-printed shapes comprises performing a plurality of physics informed simulations where uncertainty is introduced in the tool-path, wherein for each of the plurality of as printed shapes, the physics informed simulation comprises: for each deposition event of the plan, inputting an initial state of a distribution of liquid and solid phases into a feedforward neural network with physics informed loss and activation functions, the feedforward neural network outputting a spatial distribution of a substrate after the deposition event; and performing convolution of a kernel with the tool-path to obtain a spatial distribution of a solid phase of the as-printed shapes; determining geometric differences between any of the plurality of as-printed shapes with the computer representation of the product part; and using the geometric differences in the additive manufacturing process to
Data acquisition or data processing for additive manufacturing · CPC title
using machine learning, e.g. artificial intelligence, neural networks, support vector machines [SVM] or training a model · CPC title
Manufacturability analysis or optimisation for manufacturability · CPC title
Moulding by spraying metal on a surface · CPC title
Total factory control, e.g. smart factories, flexible manufacturing systems [FMS] or integrated manufacturing systems [IMS] · CPC title
Related publications grouped by family.
Answers are generated from the same data shown on this page.