Plants and seeds of canola variety scv356872
US-2015361448-A1 · Dec 17, 2015 · US
US11566260B2 · US · B2
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Publication number | US-11566260-B2 |
| Application number | US-201916564501-A |
| Country | US |
| Kind code | B2 |
| Filing date | Sep 9, 2019 |
| Priority date | Jul 16, 2012 |
| Publication date | Jan 31, 2023 |
| Grant date | Jan 31, 2023 |
A practical reading order for non-experts. Skip the full description unless you need deep technical detail.
What the patent document calls the invention.
A short plain-language summary of the technical disclosure.
Who owns or filed the patent and who is credited as inventor.
Filing, priority, publication, and grant dates set the timeline.
The legal scope of protection — read this for what is actually claimed.
Technology tags used to group this patent with similar filings.
Prior art links and similar publications in this corpus.
Official abstract text for this publication.
Disclosed is a method for preventing, controlling or treating a fungal infection on a plant. The method includes applying to such plant organ a non-fungicidal amount or a potentiating amount of a composition including a potentiating agent of a plant defense molecule, in association with a phytopharmaceutical vehicle.
Opening claim text (preview).
The invention claimed is: 1. A method for controlling or treating a fungal infection by a phytopathogenic fungal strain on a plant organ, said method comprising the steps of: i) in vitro determining the non-fungicidal concentration of at least one potentiating agent of a plant defense molecule selected from the group consisting of chelerythrine, sanguinarine; and Cl − , HSO 4 − , I − , HCO 3 − salts thereof, against the phytopathogenic fungal strain; said determination being carried out by comparing the growth of the phytopathogenic fungal strain cultures in contact with increasing concentrations of said at least one potentiating agent of a plant defense molecule, with the growth of a control culture of the phytopathogenic fungal strain, in the absence of said at least one potentiating agent of a plant defense molecule; the last concentration of the increasing concentrations of the at least one potentiating agent of a plant defense molecule resulting in the same fungal culture growth as the control culture being retained as the non-fungicidal concentration of said at least one potentiating agent of a plant defense molecule; then ii) applying on the plant organ a composition comprising said at least one potentiating agent of a plant defense molecule in the determined non-fungicidal concentration, such that the amount applied is a potentiating amount but is not an amount that is fungicidal per se, in association with a phytopharmaceutical vehicle. 2. The method according to claim 1 , wherein said in vitro determination of the non-fungicidal amount of at least one potentiating agent of a plant defense molecule is carried-out by spectrophotometry or nephelometry. 3. The method according to claim 1 , wherein said phytopathogenic fungal infection is an infection by a phytopathogenic fungus selected from the group consisting of the genera Alternaria, Sclerotinia and Venturia. 4. The method according to claim 1 , wherein said fungal infection is an infection by a phytopathogenic fungus selected from the group consisting of Alternaria brassicicola, Alternaria dauci and Ventuna inaequalis. 5. The method according to claim 1 , wherein the plant is selected from the group consisting of plants of the Brassicacae, Apiaceae, Vitaceae and Rosaceae families. 6. The method according to claim 1 , wherein the plant is selected from the group consisting of Brassica carinata, Brassica juncea, Brassica oleracea, Brassica napus, Brassica nigra and Brassica rapa. 7. The method according to claim 1 , wherein the plant is selected from the group consisting of Brassica oleracea, Daucus carota subsp. Sativa and Malus domestica. 8. The method according to claim 1 , wherein the plant organ, the phytopathogenic fungus and the non-fungicidal concentration of the at least one potentiating agent of a plant defense molecule in the applied composition is selected from the following combinations: a. said plant organ belonging to a plant of the Brassicaceae family, said phytopathogenic fungus being a strain of the Alternaria genus, and said non-fungicidal concentration of the at least one potentiating agent of a plant defense molecule in the applied composition being from 1 to 25 μM; or b. said plant organ belonging to a plant of the Apiaceae family, said phytopathogenic fungus being a strain of the Alternaria genus, and said non-fungicidal concentration of the at least one potentiating agent of a plant defense molecule in the applied composition being from 1 to 10 μM; or c. said plant organ belonging to a plant of the Rosaceae family, said phytopathogenic fungus being a strain of the Venturia genus, and said non-fungicidal concentration of the at least one potentiating agent of a plant defense molecule in the applied composition being from 1 to 5 μm. 9. The method according to claim 1 , wherein the plant organ, the phytopathogenic fungus and the non-fungicidal concentration of the at least one potentiating agent of a plant defense molecule in the applied composition is selected from the following combinations: a. said plant organ belonging to a plant of the Brassicaceae family plant, said phytopathogenic fungus being Alternaria brassicicola , and said non-fungicidal concentration of the at least one potentiating agent of a plant defense molecule in the applied composition being from 1 to 25 μM; or b. said plant organ belonging to the Daucus carota plant, said phytopathogenic fungus being Alternaria dauci , and said non-fungicidal concentration of the at least one potentiating agent of a plant defense molecule in the applied composition being from 1 to 10 μM; or c. said plant organ belonging to the Malus domestica plant, said phytopathogenic fungus being Venturia inaequalis , and said non-fungicidal concentration of the at least one potentiating agent of a plant defense molecule in the applied composition being from 1 to 5 μm. 10. The method according to claim 1 , wherein said plant organ belongs to Brassica oleracea plant, said phytopathogenic fungus being Alternaria brassicicola , and said non-fungicidal concentration of the at least one potentiating agent of a plant defense molecule in the applied composition being from 1 to 25 μM. 11. The method according to claim 1 , wherein the composition further comprises a plant defense molecule selected from the group consisting of brassinin, camalexin, resveratrol, 3,5-dihydroxybiphenyl, aucuparin and 6-methoxymellein. 12. The method according to claim 1 , wherein the composition further comprises an agent for stimulating the production of a plant defense molecule. 13. The method according to claim 1 , wherein the composition further comprises at least one agent for stimulating the production of a plant defense molecule; said agent being selected from the group consisting of acibenzolar-S-methyl, chitosan, laminarin, Reynoutria Sachalinensis extract, calcium prohexadione, harpine, yeast wall extracts, oligogalacturonides and calcium phosphite. 14. The method according to claim 1 , wherein the composition further comprises an insecticide and/or a herbicide.
Biocides, pest repellants or attractants, or plant growth regulators containing material from algae, lichens, bryophyta, multi-cellular fungi or plants, or extracts thereof (containing compounds of determined constitution A01N27/00 - A01N59/00) · CPC title
Microbial fungi; Substances produced thereby or obtained therefrom · CPC title
for fungal resistance · CPC title
Magnoliopsida [dicotyledons] · CPC title
having two or more relevant hetero rings, condensed among themselves or with a common carbocyclic ring system · CPC title
Related publications grouped by family.
Answers are generated from the same data shown on this page.