Degenerative sound isolation device

Patent metadata

Field	Value
Publication number	US-11557271-B2
Application number	US-201916680089-A
Country	US
Kind code	B2
Filing date	Nov 11, 2019
Priority date	Nov 11, 2019
Publication date	Jan 17, 2023
Grant date	Jan 17, 2023

Abstract

A sound isolation device includes at least one degenerate acoustic scatterer having a plurality of channels. The plurality of channels may include three or more channels. The channels have an open end and a terminal end, wherein the terminal ends of the channels are separate from one another. The at least one degenerate acoustic scatterer has an acoustic monopole response and an acoustic dipole response that have a substantially similar resonant frequency.

First claim

What is claimed is:

1. A sound isolation device comprising:
at least one degenerate acoustic scatterer having a plurality of channels, the plurality of channels each have an open end and a terminal end, the terminal ends of the plurality of channels being separate from each other; and
wherein the at least one degenerate acoustic scatterer has an acoustic monopole response and an acoustic dipole response, wherein the acoustic dipole response and the acoustic monopole response of the at least one degenerate acoustic scatterer have a resonant frequency that is substantially similar.

2. The sound isolation device of claim 1 , wherein the plurality of channels includes at least three channels.

3. The sound isolation device of claim 1 , wherein the plurality of channels includes at least four channels.

4. The sound isolation device of claim 3 , wherein an absorption coefficient that the at least one degenerate acoustic scatterer absorbs sound at the resonant frequency is substantially similar when either (a) at least one of the plurality of channels is aligned parallel along a wave propagation direction of the sound or (b) at least one of the plurality of channels is aligned perpendicular along a wave propagation direction of the sound.

5. The sound isolation device of claim 1 , wherein the plurality of channels are in a zigzag formation.

6. The sound isolation device of claim 1 , wherein a cross section along a width of the at least one degenerate acoustic scatterer defines a symmetrical shape having at least one line of symmetry, the symmetrical shape having an outer perimeter, wherein the open end of the plurality of channels are adjacent to the outer perimeter.

7. The sound isolation device of claim 1 , wherein each channel of the plurality of channels have a substantially similar volume.

8. The sound isolation device of claim 1 , wherein each channel of the plurality of channels have a substantially similar shape across a width of the at least one degenerate acoustic scatterer.

9. The sound isolation device of claim 1 , wherein the at least one degenerate acoustic scatterer includes a plurality of degenerate acoustic scatterers, wherein the plurality of degenerate acoustic scatterers are spaced apart at a substantially equal distance from each other, and wherein the acoustic dipole response and the acoustic monopole response of the plurality of degenerate acoustic scatterers have substantially similar resonant frequencies.

10. The sound isolation device of claim 1 , wherein the at least one degenerate acoustic scatterer is mounted within a vehicle.

11. The sound isolation device of claim 10 , wherein the at least one degenerate acoustic scatterer forms a structural member of the vehicle.

12. A sound isolation system comprising:
at least one degenerate acoustic scatterer;
the at least one degenerate acoustic scatterer having a plurality of channels, the plurality of channels each have an open end and a terminal end, the terminal ends of the plurality of channels being separate from each other;
wherein the at least one degenerate acoustic scatterer has an acoustic monopole response and an acoustic dipole response, wherein the acoustic dipole response and the acoustic monopole response of the at least one degenerate acoustic scatterer have a resonant frequency that is substantially similar;
and
a first wall and a second wall, wherein the first wall and second wall generally oppose one another and define a space, wherein the at least one degenerate acoustic scatterer is located in the space between the first wall and the second wall.

13. The sound isolation system of claim 12 , wherein the plurality of channels includes at least three channels.

14. The sound isolation system of claim 12 , wherein the plurality of channels includes at least four channels.

15. The sound isolation system of claim 14 , wherein a cross section along a width of the at least one degenerate acoustic scatterer defines a symmetrical shape having at least one line of symmetry, the symmetrical shape having an outer perimeter, wherein the open end of the plurality of channels are adjacent to the outer perimeter.

16. The sound isolation system of claim 12 , wherein each channel of the plurality of channels have a substantially similar volume.

17. The sound isolation system of claim 12 , wherein each channel of the plurality of channels have a substantially similar shape across a width of the at least one degenerate acoustic scatterer.

18. The sound isolation system of claim 12 , wherein a distance of the space between the first wall and the second wall is smaller than a wavelength at the resonant frequency:

D
<

c
f

,

and
wherein D the distance of the space between the first wall and the second wall, c is a speed of sound, and f is the resonant frequency of the acoustic monopole response and the acoustic dipole response of the at least one degenerate acoustic scatterer.

19. The sound isolation system of claim 12 , further comprising:
a plurality degenerate acoustic scatterers forming an array of degenerate acoustic scatters, the array of degenerate acoustic scatters located between the first wall and the second wall, wherein the array of degenerate acoustic scatters includes a number (N) of acoustic scatterers,
wherein a number (N) of the plurality degenerate acoustic scatterers is:
N=D /( c/f ), and

wherein D is a distance between the first wall and the second wall, c is the speed of sound in air, and f is the resonant frequency of the acoustic monopole response and the acoustic dipole response.

20. The sound isolation system of claim 19 , wherein the array of degenerate acoustic scatters are arranged along a row substantially perpendicular to one of the first wall and the second wall.

Assignees

• Toyota Eng & Mfg North America
• Toyota Motor Co Ltd

Inventors

• Su Xiaoshi
• Banerjee Debasish
• Shintaku Yuji
• Nakajima Katsuhiko

Classifications

• B60R13/0815 Primary

  Acoustic or thermal insulation of passenger compartments (wall or roof liners integrating the insulating function B60R13/02; insulating floor mats or carpets B60N3/04) · CPC title

• G10K11/162 Primary

  Selection of materials · CPC title

• G10K11/172

  using resonance effects · CPC title

• B60R13/08

  Insulating elements, e.g. for sound insulation {(sound insulating linings for trains B61D17/185; drivers' cabs for load-carrying vehicles insulated against vibrations or noise B62D33/0604; thermal or acoustic insulation of engines F02B77/11; damping of sounds using compensation by electro-acoustic methods G10K11/178)} · CPC title

• G10K11/175

  using interference effects; Masking sound · CPC title