Ransomware detection and intelligent restore
US-2019109870-A1 · Apr 11, 2019 · US
US11550901B2 · US · B2
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Publication number | US-11550901-B2 |
| Application number | US-201916263338-A |
| Country | US |
| Kind code | B2 |
| Filing date | Jan 31, 2019 |
| Priority date | Jan 31, 2019 |
| Publication date | Jan 10, 2023 |
| Grant date | Jan 10, 2023 |
A practical reading order for non-experts. Skip the full description unless you need deep technical detail.
What the patent document calls the invention.
A short plain-language summary of the technical disclosure.
Who owns or filed the patent and who is credited as inventor.
Filing, priority, publication, and grant dates set the timeline.
The legal scope of protection — read this for what is actually claimed.
Technology tags used to group this patent with similar filings.
Prior art links and similar publications in this corpus.
Official abstract text for this publication.
A process for detecting a threat for a file system is described. Audit events in the file system may be accessed, which may include unique file operations and duplicative file operations. The audit events may be de-duplicated to remove the duplicative file operations. Time series data may be generated that includes the unique file operations but not the duplicative file operations, and the time series data may be analyzed to determine whether a subset of the unique file operations includes file-access instructions. An observed pattern of the file-access instructions may be compared to a normal pattern of file-access instructions to determine whether the observed file-access instructions are abnormal. If the observed file-access instructions are abnormal, an alert may be generated.
Opening claim text (preview).
The invention claimed is: 1. A method for detection of a potential misuse of system credentials in a file system, the method comprising: accessing audit events in the file system for a time interval, the audit events including unique file operations and duplicative file operations within the time interval; de-duplicating the audit events to remove the duplicative file operations and retain the unique file operations from the audit events; generating time series data that comprises the unique file operations and is devoid of the duplicative file operations; analyzing the time series data to determine whether a subset of the unique file operations includes file-access instructions to access files corresponding to the subset of unique file operations, the files protected by system credentials; comparing a pattern of the file-access instructions in the time interval to a normal pattern of file-access instructions; determining, based at least in part on the comparing, that the file-access instructions in the subset of unique file operations are abnormal based at least in part on a deviation between the pattern of the file-access instructions in the time interval and the normal pattern of file access instructions; responsive to determining that the file-access instructions in the subset of unique file operations are abnormal, determining that the file system is vulnerable to the potential misuse of system credentials; and generating an alert based at least in part on determining that the file system is subject to the potential misuse of system credentials. 2. The method of claim 1 , wherein the audit events include information comprising, for each audit event, a user ID, a file name, a type of access, and a timestamp. 3. The method of claim 1 , wherein de-duplicating the audit events is based at least in part on an identification of successive file operations that do not lead to a change in a file state. 4. The method of claim 1 , further comprising: generating a finite state machine including one or more file states, the one or more file states including a file open state, a file read state, a file write state, a file read/write state, and a file close state; and storing the one or more file states in the finite state machine in a key value object store. 5. The method of claim 4 , wherein de-duplicating the audit events includes maintaining a file system state based on the finite state machine. 6. The method of claim 1 , wherein determining that the file-access instructions in the subset of unique file operations are abnormal comprises applying a set of machine learning models to the audit events, the set of machine learning models trained to determine the pattern or a number of file-access instructions and to compare the pattern or the number of file-access instructions to the normal pattern of file-access instructions or a normal number of file-access instructions based on features representing a normal or expected behavior of the file system. 7. The method of claim 1 , wherein determining that the file-access instructions in the subset of unique file operations are abnormal comprises applying Seasonal-Trend Decomposition Procedure Based on Loess (STL) decomposition to file delete audit events to remove seasonal and trend components and using a residue of the decomposition to generate the time series data, and performing an Exploratory Data Analysis (ESD) test on the time series data. 8. A system for detection of a potential misuse of system credentials in a file system, the system comprising: at least one processor for executing machine-readable instructions; and a memory storing instructions configured to cause the at least one processor to perform operations comprising, at least: accessing audit events in the file system for a time interval, the audit events including unique file operations and duplicative file operations within the time interval; de-duplicating the audit events to remove the duplicative file operations and retain the unique file operations from the audit events; generating time series data that comprises the unique file operations and is devoid of the duplicative file operations; analyzing the time series data to determine whether a subset of the unique file operations includes file-access instructions to access files corresponding to the subset of unique file operations, the files protected by system credentials; comparing a pattern of the file-access instructions in the time interval to a normal pattern of file-access instructions; determining, based at least in part on the comparing, that the file-access instructions in the subset of unique file operations are abnormal based at least in part on a deviation between the pattern of the file-access instructions in the time interval and the normal pattern of file access instructions; responsive to determining that the file-access instructions in the subset of unique file operations are abnormal, determining that the file system is vulnerable to the potential misuse of system credentials; and generating an alert based at least in part on determining that the file system is subject to the potential misuse of system credentials. 9. The system of claim 8 , wherein the audit events include information comprising, for each audit event, a user ID, a file name, a type of access, and a timestamp. 10. The system of claim 8 , wherein de-duplicating the audit events is based at least in part on an identification of successive file operations that do not lead to a change in a file state. 11. The system of claim 8 , wherein the operations further comprise: generating a finite state machine including one or more file states, the one or more file states including a file open state, a file read state, a file write state, a file read/write state, and a file close state; and storing the one or more file states in the finite state machine in a key value object store. 12. The system of claim 11 , wherein de-duplicating the audit events includes maintaining a file system state based on the finite state machine. 13. The system of claim 8 , wherein determining that the file-access instructions in the subset of unique file operations are abnormal comprises applying a set of machine learning models to the audit events, the set of machine learning models trained to determine the pattern or a number of file-access instructions and to compare the pattern or the number of file-access instructions to the normal pattern of file-access instructions or a normal number of file-access instructions based on features representing a normal or expected behavior of the file system. 14. The system of claim 8 , wherein determining that the file-access instructions in the subset of unique file operations are abnormal comprises applying Seasonal-Trend Decomposition Procedure Based on Loess (STL) decomposition to file delete audit events to remove seasonal and trend components and using a residue of the decomposition to generate the time series data, and performing an Exploratory Data Analysis (ESD) test on the time series data. 15. A non-transitory, machine-readable medium storing instructions which, when read by a machine, cause the machine to perform operations comprising, at least: accessing audit events in a file system for a time interval, the audit events including unique file operations and duplicative file operations within the time interval; de-duplicating the audit events to remove the duplicative file operations and retain the unique file operations from the audit events; generating time series data that comprises the unique file operations and is devoid of the d
Details of monitoring file system events, e.g. by the use of hooks, filter drivers, logs · CPC title
involving long-term monitoring or reporting · CPC title
to a system of files or objects, e.g. local or distributed file system or database · CPC title
Related publications grouped by family.
Answers are generated from the same data shown on this page.