Magnetic optimization

Patent metadata

Field	Value
Publication number	US-11538602-B2
Application number	US-201917309215-A
Country	US
Kind code	B2
Filing date	Nov 11, 2019
Priority date	Nov 9, 2018
Publication date	Dec 27, 2022
Grant date	Dec 27, 2022

Abstract

A method of designing at least one coil for producing a magnetic field is disclosed. The method comprises: i) setting a performance target comprising: a target magnetic field, and at least two of a target power, a target resistance, a target size and/or weight, a target supply voltage or current, and a target inductance; ii) determining initial design parameters for the at least one coil; iii) modelling performance with the current design parameters to determine a simulated performance against each of the performance targets; iv) calculating a penalty function based on the difference between the simulated performance and the performance targets; v) modifying the design parameters in order to reduce the penalty function; vi) iterating steps iii) to v) until the penalty function or simulated performance has met an acceptance condition.

First claim

The invention claimed is:

1. A method of designing at least one coil for producing a magnetic field, comprising:
i) setting a performance target comprising: a target magnetic field, and at least two of a target power, a target resistance, a target size and/or weight, a target supply voltage or current, and a target inductance;
ii) determining initial design parameters for the at least one coil, wherein the at least one coil is designed simultaneously with at least one permanent magnet;
iii) modelling performance with the current design parameters to determine a simulated performance against each of the performance targets, and the modelling includes the field of both the at least one permanent magnet and the field of the at least one coil;
iv) calculating a penalty function based on the difference between the simulated performance and the performance targets;
v) modifying the design parameters in order to reduce the penalty function, wherein the target magnetic field comprises a first target field corresponding with a first coil current, and a second target field corresponding with a second coil current; wherein modifying step comprising optimizing the permanent magnet and coil design to minimize the power consumed by the coil, based on a duty cycle of second target field relative to the first target field while producing same magnetic field;
vi) iterating steps iii) to v) until the penalty function or simulated performance has met an acceptance condition.

2. The method of claim 1 , wherein the at least one coil comprises at least one composite coil, each composite coil comprising a plurality of concentric or offset cylindrical sub-coils connected in series.

3. The method of claim 2 , wherein the sub-coils of each composite coil define a planar composite coil, with each of the concentric sub-coils in a composite coil having an end face in the same plane.

4. The method of claim 2 , wherein
the design parameters include the number of sub-coils.

5. The method of claim 1 , further comprising setting a design constraint for a design parameter.

6. The method of claim 5 , wherein
the design parameters comprise the cross-sectional area of the coil wire, and the design constraint comprises restricting the cross-sectional area to a discontinuous set of available cross-sectional areas.

7. The method of claim 1 , wherein the at least one coil comprises a first and second coil, configured to be axially spaced apart.

8. The method of claim 7 , wherein the modelling of the performance is based on the first and second coils being connected together in series.

9. The method of claim 7 , wherein the design parameters comprise a distance between the first and second coil.

10. The method of any of claim 7 , wherein the first and second coils are not required to have identical design parameters.

11. The method of claim 1 , wherein modelling of the performance is based on a fixed voltage power supply.

12. The method of claim 1 , wherein modifying the design parameters comprises using a multi-objective optimisation algorithm to minimise a penalty function that is weighted according to the relative importance of different parts of the performance target.

13. The method of claim 1 , wherein the target field comprises one or more of an asymmetric field gradient and a substantially linear field gradient over a defied region proximate to the at least one coil.

14. The method of claim 1 , wherein
the design parameters include magnet design parameters for the at least one magnet.

15. A magneto optical traps system for producing an electric field, comprising at least one coil for producing a magnetic field, said coil designed according to the method of claim 1 .

16. The system of claim 15 , wherein said coil comprises
a first sub-coil and a concentric or offset second sub-coil connected in series to the first sub-coil and arranged in a common plane therewith, wherein the second sub-coil differs from the first sub-coil in at least one of:
a wire cross sectional area;
a number of radial winding layers;
a number of turns per radial layer winding layer;
a winding configuration; and
a winding direction.

17. A magneto optical trap (MOT), comprising the system of claim 15 , wherein the system is configured to produce a magnetic field gradient for trapping cold atoms in a trapping region.

18. The MOT of claim 17 , wherein the system further comprises a second coil.

19. The method of claim 2 , wherein the design parameters comprise at least one of:
the cross-sectional area of a wire of each sub-coil,
the total number of windings of each sub-coil;
the number of windings per radial layer of each sub-coil;
the number of radial layers of each sub-coil;
the inner and outer diameter of each sub-coil;
the direction of winding of each sub-coil; and
the packing configuration of the windings of each sub-coil.

20. The method of claim 5 , wherein the design constraint comprises a minimum inner diameter, for enabling optical access through a central opening in the coil.

21. The method of claim 5 , wherein the design constraint comprises a maximum coil height in the axial direction.

22. The method of claim 5 , wherein the design constraint comprises a maximum diameter of the coil.

23. The method of claim 5 , wherein the at least one coil comprises at least one composite coil, each composite coil comprising a plurality of concentric or offset cylindrical sub-coils connected in series, and the design constraint comprises a number of sub-coils in each of the at least one coil.

24. The method of claim 5 , wherein the design constraint comprises one or more of:
overall system size and/or fit to surrounding components;
coil weight;
power consumption; and
coil excitation voltage.

25. The system of claim 15 , wherein said coil comprises
a first sub-coil and a first permanent magnet array.

Assignees

• Univ Nottingham

Inventors

• Fromhold Mark
• Welch Nathan
• Sims Dominic
• Ferreras Jorge
• Taylor Ian

Classifications

• H01F7/202

  Electromagnets for high magnetic field strength (for superconducting electromagnets H01F6/00; for transformers or inductances without a magnetic core H01F30/08) · CPC title

• H01F7/0278

  for generating uniform fields, focusing, deflecting electrically charged particles (for magnetic separation by Lorentz force B03C1/023; specially adapted for NMR applications G01R33/383) · CPC title

• G06F30/20

  Design optimisation, verification or simulation (optimisation, verification or simulation of circuit designs G06F30/30) · CPC title

• G21K1/30 Primary

  for confining neutral particles or handling confined neutral particles, e.g. atom traps · CPC title

• G21K1/006 Primary

  Physics · mapped topic