Multipath Selection System and Method for Datacenter-Centric Metro Networks
US-2019386913-A1 · Dec 19, 2019 · US
US11489776B2 · US · B2
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Publication number | US-11489776-B2 |
| Application number | US-202016941341-A |
| Country | US |
| Kind code | B2 |
| Filing date | Jul 28, 2020 |
| Priority date | Jul 28, 2020 |
| Publication date | Nov 1, 2022 |
| Grant date | Nov 1, 2022 |
A practical reading order for non-experts. Skip the full description unless you need deep technical detail.
What the patent document calls the invention.
A short plain-language summary of the technical disclosure.
Who owns or filed the patent and who is credited as inventor.
Filing, priority, publication, and grant dates set the timeline.
The legal scope of protection — read this for what is actually claimed.
Technology tags used to group this patent with similar filings.
Prior art links and similar publications in this corpus.
Official abstract text for this publication.
A method for reassigning flows to cores in a multi-core network device includes receiving a packet flow and periodically determining a packet rate of the flow and the processing load on each of the worker cores. Unassigned flows are assigned to the least loaded core. If an assigned flow has a packet rate that exceeds a particular threshold proportion of the processing capacity of the currently assigned worker core, reassigning the flow to the lowest loaded worker core unless the resulting load would exceed the current load on the currently assigned worker core.
Opening claim text (preview).
What is claimed is: 1. A method for processing network flows in a multi-core network device, the method comprising: receiving a packet flow at the multi-core network device having a plurality of worker cores; periodically determining a packet rate of the packet flow and a processing load on each of the plurality of worker cores; determining if the packet flow is currently assigned to one of the plurality of worker cores; in response to determining that the packet flow is not assigned, assigning the packet flow to a worker core that has the lowest processing load among the plurality of worker cores; and in response to determining that the packet flow is currently assigned and that the determined packet rate exceeds a particular threshold of the processing capacity of the currently assigned worker core: determining which of the plurality of worker cores has the lowest load; determining if reallocating the packet flow to the lowest loaded worker core would cause the load on the lowest loaded worker core to exceed the current load on the currently assigned worker core; and in response to determining that reallocating the packet flow would not cause the load on the lowest loaded worker core to exceed the current load on the currently assigned worker core, reallocating the packet flow to the lowest loaded worker core. 2. The method of claim 1 wherein the multi-core network device is programmed and configured to operate using a modular software architecture, the method further comprising: generating an instance of an offloading module adapted for processing a particular class of flow; and inserting the instance into a chain of modules in the modular software architecture, wherein the offloading module performs said reallocating of the packet flow. 3. The method of claim 2 wherein the instance of the offloading module is inserted such that an input of the module is connected between an output of a forwarding information base (FIB) module and an input to a module configured for processing the particular class of flow. 4. The method of claim 2 wherein the particular class of flow is at least one of an IP security (ipsec) decryption or ipsec encryption flow. 5. The method of claim 4 wherein the particular class of flow is restricted to non-control-plane flows. 6. The method of claim 2 wherein the modular software architecture is based upon a Berkeley Extensible Software Switch (BESS). 7. The method of claim 1 wherein the particular threshold of the processing capacity is between 50 and 60 percent. 8. The method of claim 1 wherein the determining the packet rate of the packet flow and the processing load on each of the worker cores periodically occurs between every 10 to 60 seconds. 9. The method of claim 1 wherein the reallocating the packet flow to the lowest loaded worker core is further in response to estimating that a relative difference in loads between the lowest loaded worker core and the currently assigned core is reduced by at least a minimum threshold. 10. The method of claim 9 wherein the minimum threshold is six percent of processing capacity. 11. A system for processing network flows in a multi-core network device, the system comprising: one or more processors programmed and configured to perform: receiving a packet flow at the multi-core network device having a plurality of worker cores; periodically determining a packet rate of the packet flow and a processing load on each of the plurality of worker cores; determining if the packet flow is currently assigned to one of the plurality of worker cores; in response to determining that the packet flow is not assigned, assigning the packet flow to a worker core that has the lowest processing load among the plurality of worker cores; and in response to determining that the packet flow is currently assigned and that the determined packet rate exceeds a particular threshold of the processing capacity of the currently assigned worker core: determining which of the plurality of worker cores has the lowest load; determining if reallocating the packet flow to the lowest loaded worker core would cause the load on the lowest loaded worker core to exceed the current load on the currently assigned worker core; and in response to determining that reallocating the packet flow would not cause the load on the lowest loaded worker core to exceed the current load on the currently assigned worker core, reallocating the packet flow to the lowest loaded worker core. 12. The system of claim 11 wherein the one or more processors are further programmed and configured with a modular software architecture to: generate an instance of an offloading module adapted for processing a particular class of flow; and insert the instance into a chain of modules in the modular software architecture, wherein the offloading module performs the reallocating of the packet flow. 13. The system of claim 12 wherein the instance of the offloading module is inserted such that an input of the module is connected between an output of a forwarding information base (FIB) module and an input to a module configured for processing the particular class of flow. 14. The system of claim 12 wherein the particular class of flow is at least one of an IP security (ipsec) decryption or ipsec encryption flow. 15. The system of claim 14 wherein the particular class of flow is restricted to non-control-plane flows. 16. The system of claim 12 wherein the modular software architecture is based upon a Berkeley Extensible Software Switch (BESS). 17. The system of claim 11 wherein the particular threshold of the processing capacity is between 50 and 60 percent. 18. The system of claim 11 wherein the determining the packet rate of the packet flow and the processing load on each of the worker cores periodically occurs every 10 to 60 seconds. 19. The system of claim 11 wherein the reallocating the packet flow to the lowest loaded worker core is further in response to estimating that a relative difference in loads between the lowest loaded worker core and the currently assigned core is reduced by at least a minimum threshold. 20. The system of claim 19 wherein the minimum threshold is six percent of processing capacity.
by balancing the load, e.g. traffic engineering · CPC title
relying on flow classification, e.g. using integrated services [IntServ] · CPC title
Related publications grouped by family.
Answers are generated from the same data shown on this page.