Performance testing platform that enables reuse of automation scripts and performance testing scalability
US-10210074-B1 · Feb 19, 2019 · US
US11487536B2 · US · B2
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Publication number | US-11487536-B2 |
| Application number | US-201916727083-A |
| Country | US |
| Kind code | B2 |
| Filing date | Dec 26, 2019 |
| Priority date | Dec 20, 2016 |
| Publication date | Nov 1, 2022 |
| Grant date | Nov 1, 2022 |
A practical reading order for non-experts. Skip the full description unless you need deep technical detail.
What the patent document calls the invention.
A short plain-language summary of the technical disclosure.
Who owns or filed the patent and who is credited as inventor.
Filing, priority, publication, and grant dates set the timeline.
The legal scope of protection — read this for what is actually claimed.
Technology tags used to group this patent with similar filings.
Prior art links and similar publications in this corpus.
Official abstract text for this publication.
A computer-implemented method or system is provided to automate actions for one or more applications executed via a platform using at least one virtual machine in a guest system. Each virtual machine includes a guest operating system, a guest agent and an application to be executed on the virtual machine. The method or system stores in a memory user-defined automation actions and causal relationships between the user-defined automation actions from which an automation graph is derived for the application to be executed on the virtual machine on the guest system; launches the guest system and the virtual machine via the platform; and executes the user-defined automation actions via the guest agent of the virtual machine according to the automation graph after the guest system and the virtual machine are launched.
Opening claim text (preview).
The invention claimed is: 1. A system for managing applications comprising: one or more computers comprising one or more processors and one or more tangible computer readable media, the one or more tangible computer readable media including instructions stored thereon that when executed cause the one or more computers to: implement, by the one or more processors, a software application configured to enable a user to specify one or more automation actions and causal relationships related to the one or more automation actions from which an automation graph including a first automation subgraph and a second automation subgraph; implement, by the one or more processors, a distributed guest system associated with a data store, the guest system including a first virtual machine coupled to the data store comprising the first automation subgraph and a second virtual machine coupled to the data store comprising the second automation subgraph; implement, by the one or more processors, a first guest agent on the first virtual machine and a second guest agent on the second virtual machine; execute, by the one or more processors, a communication between the first guest agent on the first virtual machine and the second guest agent on the second virtual machine; and execute, by the one or more processors, the first automation subgraph via the first guest agent and the second automation subgraph via the second guest agent in synchronization according to the one or more automated actions via the communication. 2. The system of claim 1 , wherein the first automation subgraph comprises a first automation subgraph action step; wherein the first automation subgraph action step comprises logic configured to declare a first automation subgraph fatal error; wherein the first guest agent is configured to sense and handle the first automation subgraph fatal error during execution; and wherein when the first automation subgraph fatal error is declared, the first guest agent stops the execution of the first automation subgraph. 3. The system of claim 2 , wherein the second automation subgraph comprises a second automation subgraph action step; wherein the second automation subgraph action step comprises logic configured to declare a second automation subgraph fatal error; wherein the second guest agent is configured to sense and handle the second automation subgraph fatal error during execution; and wherein when the second automation subgraph fatal error is declared, second guest agent stops the execution of the second automation subgraph. 4. The system of claim 1 , wherein the first automation subgraph and the second automation subgraph are configured to wait for each other before continuing execution. 5. The system of claim 1 , wherein the first automation subgraph comprises a first action step; wherein the second automation subgraph comprises a second action step; wherein the synchronization comprises the first guest agent and the second guest agent communicating with each other an execution state of the first action step and the second action step; and wherein the first action step executing on the first virtual machine is configured to wait for a signal from the second action step executing on the second virtual machine before continuing execution of the first automation subgraph. 6. A system for managing applications comprising: one or more computers comprising one or more processors and one or more tangible computer readable media, the one or more tangible computer readable media including instructions stored thereon that when executed cause the one or more computers to: receive and store in memory user-defined automation actions and causal relationships related to the user-defined automation actions from which an automation graph is derived, the automation graph including a first automation subgraph and a second automation subgraph; implement, by the one or more processors, a distributed guest system associated with a data store, the guest system including a first virtual machine coupled to the data store comprising the first automation subgraph and a second virtual machine coupled to the data store comprising the second automation subgraph; implement, by the one or more processors, a first guest agent on the first virtual machine and a second guest agent on the second virtual machine; execute, by the one or more processors, a communication between the first guest agent and the second guest agent; and execute, by the one or more processors, the first automation subgraph and the second automation subgraph through the first guest agent and the second guest agent such that the user-defined automation actions are implemented in a synchronized manner through the communication. 7. The system of claim 6 , wherein the distributed guest system comprises a plurality of virtual machines; wherein each of the plurality of virtual machines comprises a respective guest agent; wherein each of the plurality of virtual machines comprises a respective automation subgraph associated with each respective guest agent; and wherein the plurality of virtual machines are configured to communicate with each other while implementing their respective automation subgraphs through their respective guest agent such that automation actions can be implemented in a synchronized manner. 8. The system of claim 7 , wherein each respective automation subgraph comprises a respective graph node; and wherein each respective graph node only executes a respective automation action when a precursor respective graph node has successfully completed. 9. The system of claim 8 , wherein each respective graph node comprises logic configured to declare a fatal error; wherein each respective guest agent is configured to sense and handle the fatal error during execution; and wherein when a fatal error is declared, the respective guest agent stops the execution of the respective automation subgraph. 10. The system of claim 8 , wherein each respective graph node is configured to conditionally pass action messages and no-action messages to downstream graph nodes; wherein the action messages cause downstream respective graph nodes to execute; wherein the no-action messages cause downstream respective nodes to skip execution; and wherein each respective automation subgraph is configured to complete execution, even though some graph nodes did not execute. 11. The system of claim 10 , wherein the downstream respective graph nodes of each respective automation subgraph are configured to react in at least one of two ways: (1) as a reluctant node where any no-action message will cause the reluctant node to skip execution; or (2) as an eager node where any action message will cause the eager node to execute. 12. A system for managing applications in a platform implemented on a cloud computing architecture, the cloud computing architecture comprising one or more processors and one or more tangible computer readable media, the one or more tangible computer readable media including instructions stored thereon that when executed cause the platform to: receive and store in a memory user-defined automation actions and causal relationships related to the user-defined automation actions from which an automation graph is derived, the automation graph including a first automation subgraph and a second automation subgraph; launch, in response to a request sent over an internet, a guest system comprising at least a first virtual machine having a first guest agent, and a second virtual machine having a second guest agent; construct, by the one or more processors, the first automation subgraph on t
Emulation; Interpretation; Software simulation, e.g. virtualisation or emulation of application or operating system execution engines · CPC title
Distribution of virtual machine instances; Migration and load balancing · CPC title
Starting, stopping, suspending or resuming virtual machine instances · CPC title
Installation · CPC title
Hypervisor-specific management and integration aspects · CPC title
Related publications grouped by family.
Answers are generated from the same data shown on this page.