Enhancing reservoir production optimization through integrating inter-well tracers
US-10858931-B2 · Dec 8, 2020 · US
US11486235B2 · US · B2
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Publication number | US-11486235-B2 |
| Application number | US-201816610153-A |
| Country | US |
| Kind code | B2 |
| Filing date | May 16, 2018 |
| Priority date | May 16, 2017 |
| Publication date | Nov 1, 2022 |
| Grant date | Nov 1, 2022 |
A practical reading order for non-experts. Skip the full description unless you need deep technical detail.
What the patent document calls the invention.
A short plain-language summary of the technical disclosure.
Who owns or filed the patent and who is credited as inventor.
Filing, priority, publication, and grant dates set the timeline.
The legal scope of protection — read this for what is actually claimed.
Technology tags used to group this patent with similar filings.
Prior art links and similar publications in this corpus.
Official abstract text for this publication.
A process for use in managing a hydrocarbon production system includes: selecting, from among a plurality of changes proposed to operating parameters of the hydrocarbon production system, the proposed change with the greatest estimated positive change in production; assessing whether the selected change violates an operating constraint; based on said assessment, producing a valid change based on at least the selected change or identifying the selected change as an unusable change, iterating the above steps, the iteration excluding the valid change from the plurality of proposed changes; and implementing at least one valid change, the number of implemented valid changes being less than the number of proposed changes.
Opening claim text (preview).
The invention claimed is: 1. A process for use in managing a hydrocarbon producing system implemented by a computing system, comprising: selecting, from among a plurality of changes proposed to operating parameters of the hydrocarbon producing system, a change with the greatest estimated positive change in production from the plurality of changes proposed; assessing whether the selected change violates a set of operating constraints; producing a valid change based on at least the selected change in response to the assessment, iterating the above steps, the iteration excluding the valid change from the plurality of proposed changes; and implementing at least one valid change, the number of implemented valid changes being less than the number of proposed changes. 2. The process of claim 1 , wherein implementing at least one valid change occurs after iterating the above steps. 3. The process of claim 1 or claim 2 , wherein iterating the above steps includes iterating the above steps until all proposed changes have been selected. 4. The process of claim 1 or claim 2 , wherein iterating the above steps includes iterating the above steps a predetermined number of times. 5. The process of any one of the preceding claims, wherein implementing valid change based on at least the selected change includes: identifying the selected change as the valid change in response to the selected change not violating the set of operating constraints; and determining whether any of the remaining proposed changes, when performed before the selected change, will offset the selected change to obviate violating the operating constraints in response to the selected change violating the operating constraints; and grouping the offset change with the selected change such that the offset change is implemented before the selected change. 6. The process of claim 5 , further comprising identifying the selected change as an unusable change by abandoning the selected change if an estimated change in production of the grouped offset change and the selected change fails to exceed the estimated change in production of the proposed change with the second greatest estimated positive change in production by a first threshold amount. 7. The process of claim 5 or 6 , further comprising identifying the selected change as an unusable change by abandoning the selected change if the selected change violates the operating constraints and if none of the remaining proposed changes, when performed before the selected change, will offset the selected change to obviate violating the operating constraints. 8. The process of any one of the preceding claims, further comprising adjusting the valid change to further increase the estimated change in production associated with the valid change. 9. The process of claim 8 when dependent on claim 5 , wherein, if the valid change is identified as the selected change, adjusting the valid change comprises adjusting the selected change, and if the valid change is identified as the grouped offset change and selected change, adjusting the valid change comprises adjusting the grouped offset change and the selected change. 10. The process of claim 8 or claim 9 , wherein adjusting the valid change to further increase the estimated change in production includes adjusting the valid change to maximize the increase within the set of operating constraints. 11. The process of any one of the preceding claims, wherein the valid changes are sequenced in the order in which they are assessed; and wherein the valid changes are implemented in the order in which they are sequenced. 12. The process of any one of the preceding claims, wherein selecting the proposed change with the greatest estimated positive change in production includes ranking the proposed changes according to their respective estimated changes in production. 13. The process of claim 12 , wherein ranking the proposed changes includes: identifying the proposed changes to bring a hydrocarbon producing system from a current operating state to an optimized operating state; sequentially modeling each of the proposed changes to estimate the production change for each of the proposed changes; and ranking the proposed changes in descending order of the greatest estimated increase in production from the hydrocarbon producing system. 14. The process of claim 13 , wherein identifying the proposed changes includes: executing an optimization engine to determine the optimized operating state; and identifying the proposed changes from the differences in the operating parameters of the current operating state and the optimized operating state. 15. The process of claim 1 , further comprising: executing an optimization engine to determine an optimized operating state for the hydrocarbon production system; and identifying the proposed changes from the differences in the operating parameters of the current operating state and the optimized operating state. 16. The process of any one of the preceding claims, further wherein iterating the steps includes terminating the process if the change in estimated production becomes less than a second threshold amount prior to selecting all the proposed changes. 17. A process for use in managing hydrocarbon production in a field implemented by a computing system, comprising: ranking a plurality of changes proposed to operating parameters of at least one well in the field by an estimated change in production from each proposed change; selecting the proposed change with the greatest estimated positive change in production; if the selected change does not violate a set of operating constraints, adjusting the selected change to further increase the estimated production; if the selected change violates the operating constraints, then: determining whether any of the remaining proposed changes, when performed before the selected change, will offset the selected change to obviate violating the operating constraints; grouping the offset change with the selected change; if the estimated production of the grouped changes meets or exceeds the estimated production of the proposed change with the second greatest estimated production by a first threshold amount without violating the operating constraints, then adjusting the grouped changes to further increase the estimated production; and abandoning the selected change if the estimated production of the grouped selected change and offset change fails to exceed the estimated production of the proposed change with the second greatest estimated production by a first threshold amount; iterating the above steps until either the increase in estimated production falls below a second threshold amount or all changes have been selected; and implementing the selected changes if they have not been abandoned and any respective grouped offset changes, if any, the selected change being implemented after any grouped offset change. 18. The process of claim 17 , wherein ranking the proposed changes includes: identifying the proposed changes to bring a hydrocarbon production system for the field from a current operating state to an optimized operating state; sequentially modeling the proposed changes to estimate production increases for each proposed change; and ranking the proposed changes in descending order of the greatest estimated increase in production from the field. 19. The process of claim 18 , wherein identifying the proposed changes includes: executing an optimization engine to determine the optimized operating state; and
Long, deep drill, with drill, bore diameter small relative to length, in pipes · CPC title
Program control other than numerical control, i.e. in sequence controllers or logic controllers (G05B19/418 takes precedence) · CPC title
Analogue computers for specific processes, systems or devices, e.g. simulators · CPC title
Methods or apparatus for obtaining oil, gas, water, soluble or meltable materials or a slurry of minerals from wells (applicable only to water E03B) · CPC title
Methods or apparatus for controlling the flow of the obtained fluid to or in wells (E21B43/25 takes precedence; valve arrangements E21B34/00) · CPC title
Related publications grouped by family.
Answers are generated from the same data shown on this page.