Systems and Methods for Providing Automated Access to Resources of Computer Systems
US-2024430261-A1 · Dec 26, 2024 · US
US11451548B2 · US · B2
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Publication number | US-11451548-B2 |
| Application number | US-201916513644-A |
| Country | US |
| Kind code | B2 |
| Filing date | Jul 16, 2019 |
| Priority date | Oct 23, 2006 |
| Publication date | Sep 20, 2022 |
| Grant date | Sep 20, 2022 |
A practical reading order for non-experts. Skip the full description unless you need deep technical detail.
What the patent document calls the invention.
A short plain-language summary of the technical disclosure.
Who owns or filed the patent and who is credited as inventor.
Filing, priority, publication, and grant dates set the timeline.
The legal scope of protection — read this for what is actually claimed.
Technology tags used to group this patent with similar filings.
Prior art links and similar publications in this corpus.
Official abstract text for this publication.
A container that manages access to protected resources using rules to intelligently manage them includes an environment having a set of software and configurations that are to be managed. A rule engine, which executes the rules, may be called reactively when software accesses protected resources. The engine uses a combination of embedded and configurable rules. It may be desirable to assign and manage rules per process, per resource (e.g. file, registry, etc.), and per user. Access rules may be altitude-specific access rules.
Opening claim text (preview).
The invention claimed is: 1. A method comprising: obtaining, by a rule engine comprising one or more processors and memory, a request from a process to access one or more resources in a software container, wherein the rule engine obtaining the request comprises the rule engine using a file system hook to intercept the request, and wherein the software container includes the rule engine redundantly, or via relative global access; assigning, by the rule engine to the process, a rule that allows or denies access to the one or more resources; if the rule assigned to the process allows access to the one or more resources, instructing, by the rule engine, the software container to allow the process access to the one or more resources; if the rule assigned to the process denies access to the one or more resources and the process is located within the software container, instructing, by the rule engine, the software container to copy the one or more resources for local modification by the process. 2. The method of claim 1 , wherein the assigning the rule to the process is based on one or more of file access control lists, user access control lists, process access control lists, software handlers, file overlays, and resource overlays. 3. The method of claim 1 , wherein the process is a main process having one or more child processes and the method comprises assigning, by the rule engine to the one or more child processes, the same rule assigned to the main process. 4. The method of claim 1 , wherein the rule engine obtaining the request comprises the rule engine receiving the request from the process. 5. The method of claim 1 , wherein the rule engine obtaining the request comprises the rule engine using a virtual drive to intercept the request. 6. The method of claim 1 , wherein the file system hook is a filter driver. 7. The method of claim 1 , wherein the rule engine is local to the software container. 8. The method of claim 1 , wherein the rule engine is remote to the software container. 9. A system comprising: a rule engine comprising one or more hardware processors and memory; a software container including resources; a process; wherein, in operation, the rule engine: obtains a request from the process to access one or more resources in the software container, wherein the rule engine obtaining the request comprises the rule engine using a file system hook to intercept the request, and wherein the software container includes the rule engine redundantly, or via relative global access; assigns to the process a rule that allows or denies access to the one or more resources; if the rule assigned to the process allows access to the one or more resources, instructs the software container to allow the process access to the one or more resources; if the rule assigned to the process denies access to the one or more resources and the process is located within the software container, instructs the software container to copy the one or more resources for local modification by the process. 10. The system of claim 9 , wherein the assigning the rule to the process is based on one or more of file access control lists, user access control lists, process access control lists, software handlers, file overlays, and resource overlays. 11. The system of claim 9 , wherein the process is a main process having one or more child processes and wherein, in operation, the rule engine assigns to the one or more child processes the same rule assigned to the main process. 12. The system of claim 9 , wherein the rule engine obtaining the request comprises the rule engine receiving the request from the process. 13. The system of claim 9 , wherein the rule engine obtaining the request comprises the rule engine using a virtual drive to intercept the request. 14. The system of claim 9 , wherein the file system hook is a filter driver. 15. The system of claim 9 , wherein the rule engine is local to the software container. 16. The system of claim 9 , wherein the rule engine is remote to the software container.
for controlling access to devices or network resources · CPC title
characterised by the conditions triggering a change of settings · CPC title
Access rights, e.g. capability lists, access control lists, access tables, access matrices · CPC title
Specific access rights for resources, e.g. using capability register · CPC title
to a system of files or objects, e.g. local or distributed file system or database · CPC title
Related publications grouped by family.
Answers are generated from the same data shown on this page.