Increasing edge data confidence via trusted ethical hacking

US11438359B2 · US · B2

Patent metadata
FieldValue
Publication numberUS-11438359-B2
Application numberUS-201916663981-A
CountryUS
Kind codeB2
Filing dateOct 25, 2019
Priority dateOct 25, 2019
Publication dateSep 6, 2022
Grant dateSep 6, 2022

How to read this patent

A practical reading order for non-experts. Skip the full description unless you need deep technical detail.

  1. Title

    What the patent document calls the invention.

  2. Abstract

    A short plain-language summary of the technical disclosure.

  3. Assignees and inventors

    Who owns or filed the patent and who is credited as inventor.

  4. Key dates

    Filing, priority, publication, and grant dates set the timeline.

  5. First independent claim

    The legal scope of protection — read this for what is actually claimed.

  6. CPC / IPC classifications

    Technology tags used to group this patent with similar filings.

  7. Citations and related patents

    Prior art links and similar publications in this corpus.

Abstract

Official abstract text for this publication.

One example method includes deploying a group of bots in a computing environment that includes a group of nodes, each of the bots having an associated attack vector with respect to one or more of the nodes, receiving, from each of the bots, a report that identifies a node attacked by that bot, and a result of the attack, and adjusting, based on the bot reports, a confidence score of one or more of the attacked nodes.

First claim

Opening claim text (preview).

What is claimed is: 1. A method, comprising: deploying a group of bots in a computing environment that includes a plurality of nodes, each of the bots operable to exercise a respective attack vector with respect to one or more of the nodes, and one of the attack vectors is executable to employ a passive approach that does not involve installation of software on the nodes; receiving, from each of the bots, a report that identifies a node attacked by that bot, and a result of the attack; and adjusting, based on the reports received from the bots, a confidence score of one or more of the attacked nodes. 2. The method as recited in claim 1 , wherein the deployed bots are recognized as trustworthy by the nodes. 3. The method as recited in claim 1 , wherein a confidence score of a first node is increased as a result of the first node having successfully resisted an attack by one of the bots, and/or a confidence score of a second node is decreased as a result of the second node having unsuccessfully resisted an attack by one of the bots. 4. The method as recited in claim 1 , wherein each of the attack vectors is specific to a particular layer of the computing environment. 5. The method as recited in claim 1 , wherein the nodes comprise any one or more of a sensor, gateway/server, sensor ingest layer, or edge/cloud. 6. The method as recited in claim 1 , wherein the attack vectors target any one or more of node readings, data provenance metadata, client logins, storage of node readings, packets, and a distributed ledger network. 7. The method as recited in claim 1 , wherein a subset of the bots cooperate with each other to perform a coordinated attack of the computing environment. 8. The method as recited in claim 1 , wherein one or more of the bots operate autonomously. 9. The method as recited in claim 1 , further comprising: identifying, based on one or more bot reports, a vulnerability in the computing environment; identifying a remedial action for the vulnerability; and implementing the remedial action in a node. 10. The method as recited in claim 9 , further comprising updating a confidence score of the node based upon implementation of the remedial action. 11. A non-transitory storage medium having stored therein instructions that are executable by one or more hardware processors to perform operations comprising: deploying a group of bots in a computing environment that includes a plurality of nodes, each of the bots operable to exercise a respective attack vector with respect to one or more of the nodes, and one of the attack vectors is executable to employ a passive approach that does not involve installation of software on the nodes; receiving, from each of the bots, a report that identifies a node attacked by that bot, and a result of the attack; and adjusting, based on the reports received from the bots, a confidence score of one or more of the attacked nodes. 12. The non-transitory storage medium as recited in claim 11 , wherein the deployed bots are recognized as trustworthy by the nodes. 13. The non-transitory storage medium as recited in claim 11 , wherein a confidence score of a first node and/or data associated with the first node is increased as a result of the first node having successfully resisted an attack by one of the bots, and/or a confidence score of a second node and/or data associated with the second node is decreased as a result of the second node having unsuccessfully resisted an attack by one of the bots. 14. The non-transitory storage medium as recited in claim 11 , wherein each of the attack vectors is specific to a particular layer of the computing environment. 15. The non-transitory storage medium as recited in claim 11 , wherein the nodes comprise any one or more of a sensor, gateway/server, sensor ingest layer, or edge/cloud. 16. The non-transitory storage medium as recited in claim 11 , wherein the attack vectors target any one or more of node readings, data provenance metadata, client logins, storage of node readings, packets, and a distributed ledger network. 17. The non-transitory storage medium as recited in claim 11 , wherein a subset of the bots cooperate with each other to perform a coordinated attack of the computing environment. 18. The non-transitory storage medium as recited in claim 11 , wherein one or more of the bots operate autonomously. 19. The non-transitory storage medium as recited in claim 11 , wherein the operations further comprise: identifying, based on one or more bot reports, a vulnerability in the computing environment; identifying a remedial action for the vulnerability; and implementing the remedial action in a node. 20. The non-transitory storage medium as recited in claim 19 , wherein the operations further comprise updating a confidence score of the node based upon implementation of the remedial action.

Assignees

Inventors

Classifications

  • Vulnerability analysis · CPC title

  • Traffic logging, e.g. anomaly detection · CPC title

  • Passive attacks, e.g. eavesdropping or listening without modification of the traffic monitored · CPC title

  • Active attacks involving interception, injection, modification, spoofing of data unit addresses, e.g. hijacking, packet injection or TCP sequence number attacks · CPC title

  • Detection or countermeasures against botnets · CPC title

Patent family

Related publications grouped by family.

External sources

Frequently asked questions

Answers are generated from the same data shown on this page.

What does patent US11438359B2 cover?
One example method includes deploying a group of bots in a computing environment that includes a group of nodes, each of the bots having an associated attack vector with respect to one or more of the nodes, receiving, from each of the bots, a report that identifies a node attacked by that bot, and a result of the attack, and adjusting, based on the bot reports, a confidence score of one or more…
Who is the assignee on this patent?
Emc Ip Holding Co Llc, EMC IP Holding Comapny LLC
What technology area does this patent fall under?
Primary CPC classification H04L63/1433. Mapped technology areas include Electricity.
When was this patent published?
Publication date Tue Sep 06 2022 00:00:00 GMT+0000 (Coordinated Universal Time) (B2). Legal status and post-grant events are not shown on this page.
What related patents are in patentsdb?
We list 8 related publications on this page (citations in our corpus or others sharing the same primary CPC).