Method and apparatus for generating information assessment model
US-2020401852-A1 · Dec 24, 2020 · US
US11403680B2 · US · B2
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Publication number | US-11403680-B2 |
| Application number | US-201916421921-A |
| Country | US |
| Kind code | B2 |
| Filing date | May 24, 2019 |
| Priority date | Feb 12, 2018 |
| Publication date | Aug 2, 2022 |
| Grant date | Aug 2, 2022 |
A practical reading order for non-experts. Skip the full description unless you need deep technical detail.
What the patent document calls the invention.
A short plain-language summary of the technical disclosure.
Who owns or filed the patent and who is credited as inventor.
Filing, priority, publication, and grant dates set the timeline.
The legal scope of protection — read this for what is actually claimed.
Technology tags used to group this patent with similar filings.
Prior art links and similar publications in this corpus.
Official abstract text for this publication.
According to an exemplary embodiment of the present disclosure, a method, apparatus for evaluating a review, a device and a computer readable storage medium are provided. The method for evaluating a review includes obtaining a first vectorized representation of a set of text items in a review for a target object. The method further includes extracting a semantic feature of at least two consecutive text items of the set of text items based on the first vectorized representation. The method further includes determining a degree of importance of the at least two consecutive text items in a context of the review, and determining a degree of the review helping a user to evaluate the target object, based on the degree of importance and the semantic feature. In this way, an automatic, efficient, and accurate evaluation of the value of a review may be achieved.
Opening claim text (preview).
What is claimed is: 1. A method for evaluating a review, the method comprising: obtaining a first vectorized representation of a set of text items in a review for a target object; extracting a semantic feature of at least two consecutive text items of the set of text items based on the first vectorized representation; determining a degree of importance of the at least two consecutive text items in a context of the review; determining a degree of the review helping a user to evaluate the target object, based on the degree of importance and the semantic feature; obtaining a training review for a training object and a target degree of the training review helping the user to evaluate the training object; and determining a parameter set of a learning network based on the training review and the target degree, such that an error between a predicted degree of the training review helping the user to evaluate the training object determined using the learning network and the target degree is within a first error threshold, wherein the learning network is utilized to perform at least one of: the extracting of the semantic feature, the determining of the degree of importance, or the determining of the degree of the review helping the user to evaluate the target object. 2. The method according to claim 1 , wherein extracting the semantic feature comprises: obtaining a second vectorized representation of subtext items in the set of text items; combining the first vectorized representation and the second vectorized representation to generate a combined vectorized representation; and extracting the semantic feature from the combined vectorized representation. 3. The method according to claim 2 , wherein each text item comprises a word in the review, and each subtext item comprises a character that makes up a word. 4. The method according to claim 2 , wherein each text item comprises a set of words in the review, and each subtext item comprises a single word. 5. The method according to claim 1 , wherein the determining a degree of the review helping a user to evaluate the target object comprises: weighting the semantic feature with the degree of importance to generate a combined feature of the review; and determining the degree of the review helping the user to evaluate the target object based on the combined feature. 6. The method according to claim 1 , wherein determining the parameter set of the learning network further comprises: obtaining a target score of the training object by a reviewer of the training review; and determining the parameter set of the learning network based on the target score, such that an error between a predicted score of the training object by the reviewer determined using the learning network and the target score is within a second error threshold. 7. The method according to claim 1 , further comprising: obtaining an initial vectorized representation of text items included in the training review; and updating the initial vectorized representation while determining the parameter set to obtain the first vectorized representation. 8. An apparatus for evaluating a review, the apparatus comprising: at least one processor; and a memory storing instructions, the instructions when executed by the at least one processor, cause the at least one processor to perform operations, the operations comprising: obtaining a first vectorized representation of a set of text items in a review for a target object; extracting a semantic feature of at least two consecutive text items of the set of text items based on the first vectorized representation; determining a degree of importance of the at least two consecutive text items in a context of the review; determining a degree of the review helping a user to evaluate the target object, based on the degree of importance and the semantic feature; obtaining a training review for a training object and a target degree of the training review helping the user to evaluate the training object; and determining a parameter set of a learning network based on the training review and the target degree, such that an error between a predicted degree of the training review helping the user to evaluate the training object determined using the learning network and the target degree is within a first error threshold, wherein the learning network is utilized to perform at least one of: the extracting of the semantic feature, the determining of the degree of importance, or the determining of the degree of the review helping the user to evaluate the target object. 9. The apparatus according to claim 8 , wherein the extracting the semantic feature comprises: obtaining a second vectorized representation of subtext items in the set of text items; combining the first vectorized representation and the second vectorized representation to generate a combined vectorized representation; and extracting the semantic feature from the combined vectorized representation. 10. The apparatus according to claim 9 , wherein each text item comprises a word in the review, and each subtext item comprises a character that makes up a word. 11. The apparatus according to claim 9 , wherein each text item comprises a set of words in the review, and each subtext item comprises a single word. 12. The apparatus according to claim 8 , wherein the determining a degree of the review helping a user to evaluate the target object comprises: weighting the semantic feature with the degree of importance to generate a combined feature of the review; and determining the degree of the review helping the user to evaluate the target object based on the combined feature. 13. The apparatus according to claim 8 , wherein determining the parameter set of the learning network further comprises: obtaining a target score of the training object by a reviewer of the training review; and determining the parameter set of the learning network based on the target score, such that an error between a predicted score of the training object by the reviewer determined using the learning network and the target score is within a second error threshold. 14. The apparatus according to claim 8 , the operations further comprising: obtaining an initial vectorized representation of text items included in the training review; and updating the initial vectorized representation while determining the parameter set to obtain the first vectorized representation. 15. A non-transitory computer readable storage medium, storing a computer program thereon, the program, when executed by a processor, causes the processor to perform operations, the operations comprising: obtaining a first vectorized representation of a set of text items in a review for a target object; extracting a semantic feature of at least two consecutive text items of the set of text items based on the first vectorized representation; determining a degree of importance of the at least two consecutive text items in a context of the review; determining a degree of the review helping a user to evaluate the target object, based on the degree of importance and the semantic feature; obtaining a training review for a training object and a target degree of the training review helping the user to evaluate the training object; and determining a parameter set of the learning network based on the training review and the target degree, such that an error between a predicted degree of the training review helping the user to evaluate the training object determined using the learning network and the target degree is within a first error threshold.
Classification of content, e.g. text, photographs or tables · CPC title
using neural networks · CPC title
based on feedback of a supervisor · CPC title
Rating or review of business operators or products · CPC title
Semantic analysis · CPC title
Related publications grouped by family.
Answers are generated from the same data shown on this page.