Mounting angle error detection method and apparatus for onboard radar apparatus, and onboard radar apparatus
US-2018120416-A1 · May 3, 2018 · US
US11402467B2 · US · B2
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Publication number | US-11402467-B2 |
| Application number | US-201916565886-A |
| Country | US |
| Kind code | B2 |
| Filing date | Sep 10, 2019 |
| Priority date | Dec 29, 2018 |
| Publication date | Aug 2, 2022 |
| Grant date | Aug 2, 2022 |
A practical reading order for non-experts. Skip the full description unless you need deep technical detail.
What the patent document calls the invention.
A short plain-language summary of the technical disclosure.
Who owns or filed the patent and who is credited as inventor.
Filing, priority, publication, and grant dates set the timeline.
The legal scope of protection — read this for what is actually claimed.
Technology tags used to group this patent with similar filings.
Prior art links and similar publications in this corpus.
Official abstract text for this publication.
Methods and computer devices for determining an angular offset of a radar system having been mounted on a vehicle having a forward direction of travel along a surface. The angular offset is an angle between the scanning direction and the forward direction. The method includes receiving radar data from the radar system. The method includes determining projections of an immobile object velocity in the scanning direction and a direction perpendicular to the scanning direction. The method also includes determining the angular offset of the radar system based on at least one of the projections of the immobile object velocity.
Opening claim text (preview).
The invention claimed is: 1. A method of calibrating a radar system based on an angular offset, the radar system having been mounted on a vehicle, the vehicle having a forward direction of travel along a surface, the radar system having a scanning direction, the angular offset being an angle between the scanning direction and the forward direction, the method executable by a computer device, the computer device being communicatively coupled to the radar system, the method comprising: at a given moment in time during operation of the radar system: receiving radar data from the radar system, the radar data including point-specific data associated with a plurality of detected objects, the point-specific data associated with a given detected object being indicative of (i) a position of the given detected object, and (ii) an actual radial speed of the given detected object; determining, by the computer device, projections of an immobile object velocity in (i) the scanning direction and (ii) a direction perpendicular to the scanning direction by using an iterative process, the immobile object velocity being associated with a subset of detected objects of the plurality of detected objects, the plurality of detected objects including detected objects that are immobile with respect to the surface and at least one detected object that is non-immobile with respect to the surface, the subset of detected objects having a plurality of objects that are immobile with respect to the surface, the projections of the immobile object velocity being derivable from the actual radial speed of the respective ones of the subset of detected objects, the determining the projections of the immobile object velocity including: during a given iteration of the iterative process: determining candidate projections of velocity (i) in the scanning direction and (ii) in the direction perpendicular to the scanning direction, for the plurality of detected objects based on the point-specific data of the plurality of detected objects; using the candidate projections of velocity and the respective positions of the plurality of detected objects to determine respective estimated radial speeds for the plurality of detected objects; in response to a difference between (i) the estimated radial speeds of the plurality of detected objects and (ii) the actual radial speeds of the plurality of detected objects being above a threshold, removing the given detected object from the plurality of detected objects thereby generating a reduced set of detected objects, the given detected object corresponding to a non-immobile object with respect to the surface; during a following iteration of the iterative process: determining new candidate projections of velocity (i) in the scanning direction and (ii) in the direction perpendicular to the scanning direction, for the reduced set of detected objects based on the point-specific data of the reduced set of detected objects; using the new candidate projections and the respective positions of the reduced set of detected objects to determine respective new estimated radial speeds for the reduced set of detected objects; in response to differences between (i) the respective new estimated radial speeds of the reduced set of detected objects and (ii) the respective actual radial speeds of the reduced set of detected objects being below the threshold, determining that the reduced set of detected objects is the subset of detected objects and that the new candidate projections are the projections of the immobile object velocity; determining, by the computer device, the angular offset of the radar system based on at least one of the projections of the immobile object velocity; and performing, by the computer device, calibration of the radar system based on the angular offset. 2. The method of claim 1 , wherein the method comprises determining the respective estimated radial speeds for the plurality of detected objects by applying a following equation: V imob - cand - x * x i r i + V imob - cand - y * y i r i = v i - est 3. The method of claim 1 , wherein the determining the angular offset of the radar system is performed by applying a following equation: θ=π−atan 2( V imob-y ,V imob-x ) 4. The method of claim 1 , wherein the radar data is captured when the vehicle is travelling along the forward direction of travel at the velocity of the vehicle. 5. The method of claim 4 , wherein the velocity of the vehicle is substantially constant. 6. The method of claim 4 , wherein the forward direction is a strict forward direction. 7. The method of claim 1 , wherein the position of a given detected object is at least one of: (i) a distance of the given detected object from the radar system, and (ii) a horizontal angle of the given detected object with the scanning direction of the radar system; and a distance of the given detected object from the radar system (i) in the scanning direction, and (ii) in the direction perpendicular to the scanning direction. 8. The method of claim 1 , wherein the actual radial speed of a given detected object is a doppler speed of the given detected object as determined by the radar system. 9. The method of claim 1 , wherein the determining the projections of the immobile object velocity is performed by the computer device employing an iterative optimization algorithm. 10. The method of claim 1 , wherein the determining the candidate projections of velocity is performed by the computer device employing an Ordinary Least Squares (OLS) algorithm. 11. The method of claim 10 , wherein the OLS algorithm is employed on a following set of equations: v x 1 * x 1 r 1 + v y 1 *
Systems of measurement based on relative movement of target · CPC title
in azimuth, i.e. in the horizontal plane · CPC title
Apparatus for measuring unknown time intervals by electromechanical means · CPC title
Means for monitoring or calibrating · CPC title
Antenna boresight · CPC title
Related publications grouped by family.
Answers are generated from the same data shown on this page.