Apparatus and method of evaluating response time of nuclear plant protection system

Patent metadata

Field	Value
Publication number	US-11398318-B2
Application number	US-201815995258-A
Country	US
Kind code	B2
Filing date	Jun 1, 2018
Priority date	Jun 2, 2017
Publication date	Jul 26, 2022
Grant date	Jul 26, 2022

Abstract

Provided is an apparatus for evaluating a response time of a plant protection system. The apparatus includes: a classification module classifying a design process related to a response time requirement of each channel performing a safety function into four operations of a safety analysis operation, a system design operation, a response time analysis operation, and a response time test operation; and an integrated evaluation module determining whether a response time evaluation is proper based on a time t1 derived in the safety analysis operation, a time t2 derived in the system design operation, a time t3 derived in the response time analysis operation, and a time t4 derived in the response time test operation.

First claim

What is claimed is:

1. An apparatus including a processor for evaluating a response time of a plant protection system in a nuclear power plant, the apparatus, comprising:
a safety analysis circuitry in the processor that measures an analytical response time t 1 that is a response time of a system performing a safety function;
a system design circuitry in the processor that measures a designed response time t 2 representing a total sum of individual response times allocated to each device of a plurality of devices constituting an instrumentation channel;
a response time analysis circuitry in the processor that measures an estimated response time t 3 representing a response time quantitatively analyzed in each device constituting the instrumentation channel;
a response time test circuitry in the processor that divides each device constituting the instrumentation channel into n grouping regions and measures a measured response time t 4 representing a response time measured over the n grouping regions including an overlap, where the overlap is provided at an edge of the adjacent regions; and
an integrated evaluation circuitry in the processor to determine that a response time requirement is satisfied in each of the safety analysis circuitry, the system design circuitry, the response time analysis circuitry, and the response time test circuitry when t 4 <t 3 <t 2 <t 1 are all satisfied,
wherein the apparatus sequentially determines whether t 1 >t 2 is satisfied, whether t 2 >t 3 is satisfied, and whether t 3 >t 4 is satisfied,
wherein the devices constituting the instrumentation channel comprise a transmitter, a signal processor, the plant protection system, and a reactor trip switchgear system,
wherein the measured response time t 4 is calculated as

t
⁢

⁢
4

=

∑

k
=
1

n

⁢

RT
Overlapped

⁡

(
k
)

where k denotes a grouping region of each device constituting the instrumentation channel and n denotes the number of grouping regions, and RToverlapped (k) denotes a measured response time of a kth device having an overlap, and
wherein the transmitter, the signal processor, the plant protection system, and the reactor trip switchgear system constituting the instrumentation channel are divided into three grouping regions such that a first grouping region is the transmitter, a second grouping region is the signal processor and the plant protection system, and a third grouping region is the reactor trip switchgear system.

2. The apparatus of claim 1 , wherein, when t 1 −t 2 =M 1 , t 2 −t 3 =M 2 , and t 3 −t 4 =M 3 , the integrated evaluation circuitry determines whether a first condition of M 1 >0, M 2 >0, and M 3 >0 and a second condition of t 1 =t 4 +M 1 +M 2 +M 3 are both satisfied.

3. The apparatus of claim 1 , wherein the designed response time t 2 is calculated as

t
⁢

⁢
2

=

∑

i
=
1

m

⁢

RT
Allocated

⁡

(
i
)

,

where i denotes each device constituting the instrumentation channel, m denotes a total number of devices constituting the instrumentation channel, and RT Allocated (i) denotes a response time allocated to an ith device constituting the instrumentation channel.

4. The apparatus of claim 1 , wherein the estimated response time t 3 is calculated as

t
⁢

⁢
3

=

∑

j
=
1

n

⁢

RT
Quantified

⁡

(
j
)

,

where j denotes each device constituting the instrumentation channel, n denotes a total number of devices constituting the instrumentation channel, and RT Quantified (j) denotes a quantitatively analyzed response time of a jth device.

5. The apparatus of claim 4 , wherein the plant protection system among the devices constituting the instrumentation channel comprises a comparison logic processor and a coincidence logic processor that execute software.

Assignees

• Kepco Eng & Constr Co Inc

Inventors

• Lee Chang Jae
• Yun Jae Hee

Classifications

• G05B23/0254

  based on a quantitative model, e.g. mathematical relationships between inputs and outputs; functions: observer, Kalman filter, residual calculation, Neural Networks · CPC title

• G21D3/06 Primary

  responsive to faults within the plant (in the reactor G21C9/00) · CPC title

• G05B23/0283

  Predictive maintenance, e.g. involving the monitoring of a system and, based on the monitoring results, taking decisions on the maintenance schedule of the monitored system; Estimating remaining useful life [RUL] (preventive maintenance, i.e. planning maintenance according to the available resources without monitoring the system G06Q10/06) · CPC title

• G21C17/00

  Monitoring; Testing (measuring in general G01); {Maintaining} · CPC title

• G21D3/001

  Computer implemented control · CPC title