Distributed graph database
US-2017091246-A1 · Mar 30, 2017 · US
US11379403B2 · US · B2
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Publication number | US-11379403-B2 |
| Application number | US-202017071174-A |
| Country | US |
| Kind code | B2 |
| Filing date | Oct 15, 2020 |
| Priority date | Aug 6, 2018 |
| Publication date | Jul 5, 2022 |
| Grant date | Jul 5, 2022 |
A practical reading order for non-experts. Skip the full description unless you need deep technical detail.
What the patent document calls the invention.
A short plain-language summary of the technical disclosure.
Who owns or filed the patent and who is credited as inventor.
Filing, priority, publication, and grant dates set the timeline.
The legal scope of protection — read this for what is actually claimed.
Technology tags used to group this patent with similar filings.
Prior art links and similar publications in this corpus.
Official abstract text for this publication.
Techniques are provided to allow more sophisticated operations to be performed remotely by machines that are not fully functional. Operations that can be performed reliably by a machine that has experienced a hardware and/or software error are referred to herein as Remote Direct Memory Operations or “RDMOs”. Unlike RDMAs, which typically involve trivially simple operations such as the retrieval of a single value from the memory of a remote machine, RDMOs may be arbitrarily complex. The techniques described herein can help applications run without interruption when there are software faults or glitches on a remote system with which they interact.
Opening claim text (preview).
What is claimed is: 1. A method of performing an operation on a first computing device, comprising: executing, on the first computing device, an application capable of performing the operation; wherein the first computing device includes a network interface controller with an execution candidate capable of interpreting instructions that, when interpreted, cause performance of the operation; wherein the application and the execution candidate have access to a shared memory of the first computing device; wherein the operation requires multiple accesses to data in the shared memory; selecting, by a requesting entity executing on a second computing device that is remote relative to the first computing device, a target from among the application and the execution candidate; responsive to the application being selected as the target, the requesting entity sending the application a request to perform the operation; and responsive to the execution candidate being selected as the target, the requesting entity causing the execution candidate to interpret instructions that, when interpreted by the execution candidate, cause performance of the operation. 2. The method of claim 1 further comprising sending, from the second computing device to the first computing device, data that specifies the instructions that, when interpreted by the execution candidate, cause performance of the operation. 3. The method of claim 1 wherein the execution candidate is a JAVA virtual machine and the instructions are byte-code. 4. The method of claim 3 wherein the execution candidate is implemented in firmware of the network interface controller. 5. The method of claim 3 wherein the execution candidate is software executing on one or more processors within the network interface controller. 6. The method of claim 1 , wherein the shared memory associated with the first computing device is volatile memory contained by the first computing device. 7. The method of claim 1 wherein the application is implemented within an operating system executing on the first computing device. 8. The method of claim 1 wherein the application is implemented within a privileged domain on the first computing device. 9. The method of claim 1 , wherein: said selecting, by the requesting entity, the target from among the application and the execution candidate is based on one or more factors; the one or more factors comprise one or more of: relative amount of resources available to the application and to the execution candidate; likelihood of failure; likelihood of crashing; an indication of unavailability of the application; or complexity of the operation. 10. One or more non-transitory computer-readable media storing one or more sequences of instructions for performing an operation on a first computing device, the one or more sequences of instructions comprising instructions that, when executed by one or more processors, cause: executing, on the first computing device, an application capable of performing the operation; wherein the first computing device includes a network interface controller with an execution candidate capable of interpreting instructions that, when interpreted, cause performance of the operation; wherein the application and the execution candidate have access to a shared memory of the first computing device; wherein the operation requires multiple accesses to data in the shared memory; selecting, by a requesting entity executing on a second computing device that is remote relative to the first computing device, a target from among the application and the execution candidate; responsive to the application being selected as the target, the requesting entity sending the application a request to perform the operation; and responsive to the execution candidate being selected as the target, the requesting entity causing the execution candidate to interpret instructions that, when interpreted by the execution candidate, cause performance of the operation. 11. The one or more non-transitory computer-readable media of claim 10 , wherein the one or more sequences of instructions further comprise instructions that, when executed by one or more processors, cause sending, from the second computing device to the first computing device, data that specifies the instructions that, when interpreted by the execution candidate, cause performance of the operation. 12. The one or more non-transitory computer-readable media of claim 10 wherein the execution candidate is a JAVA virtual machine and the instructions are byte-code. 13. The one or more non-transitory computer-readable media of claim 10 , wherein the shared memory associated with the first computing device is volatile memory contained by the first computing device. 14. The one or more non-transitory computer-readable media of claim 12 wherein the execution candidate is implemented in firmware of the network interface controller. 15. The one or more non-transitory computer-readable media of claim 12 wherein the execution candidate is software executing on one or more processors within the network interface controller. 16. The one or more non-transitory computer-readable media of claim 10 wherein the application is implemented within an operating system executing on the first computing device. 17. The one or more non-transitory computer-readable media of claim 10 wherein the application is implemented within a privileged domain on the first computing device. 18. The one or more non-transitory computer-readable media of claim 10 , wherein: said selecting, by the requesting entity, the target from among the application and the execution candidate is based on one or more factors; the one or more factors comprise one or more of: relative amount of resources available to the application and to the execution candidate; likelihood of failure; likelihood of crashing; an indication of unavailability of the application; or complexity of the operation.
Hypervisors; Virtual machine monitors · CPC title
Failover techniques · CPC title
using centralised failover control functionality · CPC title
using a common memory, e.g. mailbox · CPC title
where the redundant components share persistent storage (G06F11/2043 takes precedence) · CPC title
Related publications grouped by family.
Answers are generated from the same data shown on this page.