Industrial automation data quality and analysis
US-2024160164-A1 · May 16, 2024 · US
US11327474B2 · US · B2
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Publication number | US-11327474-B2 |
| Application number | US-201817258239-A |
| Country | US |
| Kind code | B2 |
| Filing date | Jul 30, 2018 |
| Priority date | Jul 30, 2018 |
| Publication date | May 10, 2022 |
| Grant date | May 10, 2022 |
A practical reading order for non-experts. Skip the full description unless you need deep technical detail.
What the patent document calls the invention.
A short plain-language summary of the technical disclosure.
Who owns or filed the patent and who is credited as inventor.
Filing, priority, publication, and grant dates set the timeline.
The legal scope of protection — read this for what is actually claimed.
Technology tags used to group this patent with similar filings.
Prior art links and similar publications in this corpus.
Official abstract text for this publication.
Producing a product, differently detailed structural information about a structure of the product and digital machining information about a machining process are read in. The structural information is examined as to whether a respective item of structural information is given further detail by a respective other structure. A plurality of machining sequences are generated from the structural information and machining information so that an item of structural information from a first machining sequence is given detail by an item of structural information from a second machining sequence. The first machining sequence is transmitted to a first planning module and the second machining sequence is transmitted to a second planning module. The planning modules generate an action sequence as a planning result, which is considered by the second planning module during generation of the action sequence. Control signals are output by the action sequence generated by the second planning module.
Opening claim text (preview).
The invention claimed is: 1. A method for manufacturing a product by a production system, the method comprising: reading in differently detailed, digital structural statements about a structure of the product or of a precursor of the product and digital machining statements about a machining process for the product or for a precursor of the product; checking the structural statements to determine whether a respective structural statement is provided with further detail by a respective other structural statement; generating multiple machining sequences for the product from the structural statements and machining statements such that a first structural statement comprising a first machining sequence is provided with further detail by a second structural statement comprising a second machining sequence; transmitting the first machining sequence to a first planning module and transmitting the second machining sequence to a second planning module; generating, by the first planning module using the first machining sequence, an action sequence; transmitting the action sequence output by the first planning module to the second planning module; generating, by the second planning module, a new action sequence that takes into consideration the action sequence output by the first planning module and the second machining sequence, such that the action sequence output by the first planning module is refined by the second planning module to generate the new action sequence; and generating and outputting control signals for controlling the production system using the new action sequence generated by the second planning module. 2. The method as claimed in claim 1 , wherein the structural statements are stored as nodes in one or more digital structure graphs. 3. The method as claimed in claim 2 , wherein the checking is a check to determine whether a first structural statement is provided with further detail by a second structural statement, and involves checking whether a partial structure graph based on a node of the first structural statement contains a partial structure graph based on a node of the second structural statement, and/or whether the node of the second structural statement succeeds the node of the first structural statement in a structure graph in respect of a reference structure thereof. 4. The method as claimed in claim 1 , wherein the structural statements each comprise an attribute that indicates a degree of detailing, and in that the checking is performed on a basis of the attribute. 5. The method as claimed in claim 1 , wherein the structural statements and the machining statements are each stored as nodes in a digital production graph such that a respective structural statement that provides a respective other structural statement with further detail succeeds the other structural statement in the production graph in respect of a reference structure thereof. 6. The method as claimed in claim 5 , wherein the machining sequences are each generated as a partial graph of the production graph. 7. The method as claimed in claim 1 , wherein target structural statements that each specify a target state of the product are selected from the structural statements, and in that the machining sequences are generated such that a target structural statement comprising the first machining sequence is provided with further detail by a target structural statement comprising the second machining sequence. 8. The method as claimed in claim 7 , wherein the generating of a respective machining sequence involves the respective machining sequence being progressively assigned at least one structural statement and at least one machining statement based on a respective target structural statement, the statements specifying a conversion of at least one precursor into the respective target state by at least one machining process. 9. The method as claimed in claim 8 , wherein the generation of a respective machining sequence is terminated as soon as all starting points for the machining sequence comprise only stipulated starting materials. 10. The method as claimed in claim 1 , wherein the new action sequence output by the second planning module is rated on a basis of a stipulated criterion, which is taken as a basis for prompting the first planning module to generate a further action sequence and/or a new machining sequence to be generated. 11. The method as claimed in claim 1 , wherein if a planning module or a hardware driver of the production system reports an error then a new machining sequence is generated taking into consideration the error. 12. The method as claimed in claim 1 , wherein the new action sequence is output together with an associated detailing statement. 13. A control device for controlling a production system, configured to carry out the method as claimed in claim 1 . 14. A computer program product, comprising a computer readable hardware storage device having computer readable program code stored therein, said program code executable by a processor of a computer system to implement the method as claimed in claim 1 . 15. A computer-readable storage medium containing a computer program product as claimed in claim 14 .
Total factory control, e.g. smart factories, flexible manufacturing systems [FMS] or integrated manufacturing systems [IMS] · CPC title
characterised by modeling, simulation of the manufacturing system · CPC title
characterised by data acquisition, e.g. workpiece identification · CPC title
Action and material and technology combined to manufacture product · CPC title
characterised by job scheduling, process planning, material flow · CPC title
Related publications grouped by family.
Answers are generated from the same data shown on this page.