Layer four optimization for a virtual network defined over public cloud
US-2019158605-A1 · May 23, 2019 · US
US11258713B2 · US · B2
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Publication number | US-11258713-B2 |
| Application number | US-202016886540-A |
| Country | US |
| Kind code | B2 |
| Filing date | May 28, 2020 |
| Priority date | Apr 6, 2020 |
| Publication date | Feb 22, 2022 |
| Grant date | Feb 22, 2022 |
A practical reading order for non-experts. Skip the full description unless you need deep technical detail.
What the patent document calls the invention.
A short plain-language summary of the technical disclosure.
Who owns or filed the patent and who is credited as inventor.
Filing, priority, publication, and grant dates set the timeline.
The legal scope of protection — read this for what is actually claimed.
Technology tags used to group this patent with similar filings.
Prior art links and similar publications in this corpus.
Official abstract text for this publication.
In some embodiments, a first network device in a first site sets a first IP address for an interface of the first network device to a value of a second IP address of a second network device in a second site. Policies are added in a policy table to cover IP addresses used in the second site and a specific route for a third IP address associated with a first workload migrated from the second site to the first site is added into a routing table. The first workload is on a stretched network that is coupled via a layer 2 channel. The policy table configures the first network device to send a second packet from the first workload to a third workload in the second site via the layer 2 channel when an IP address for the third workload does not match an eligible route in the routing table.
Opening claim text (preview).
What is claimed is: 1. A method comprising: setting, by a first network device in a first site, a first Internet Protocol (IP) address for an interface of the first network device to a value of a second IP address of a second network device in a second site; adding a set of policies in a policy table to cover a set of IP addresses used in the second site; adding a specific route into a routing table for the first network device for a third IP address associated with a first workload when it is detected that the first workload is migrated from the second site to the first site, wherein the first workload is on a stretched network between the first site and the second site that is coupled via a layer 2 channel, wherein: the specific route in the routing table configures the first network device to send a first packet from a second workload local to the first site to the first workload without sending the first packet to the second site, and the policy table configures the first network device to send a second packet from the first workload to a third workload in the second site via the layer 2 channel between the first site when an IP address for the third workload does not match an eligible route in the routing table. 2. The method of claim 1 , wherein: the first network device is configured to review the policy table after not finding the eligible route in the routing table. 3. The method of claim 1 , wherein: the first network device includes a first Media Access Control (MAC) address and the second network device includes a second MAC address, and the second packet is sent to the IP address of the third workload and a MAC address associated with the first MAC address of the first network device. 4. The method of claim 1 , wherein the set of IP addresses found in the second site are for networks connected to the second network device in the second site. 5. The method of claim 1 , wherein the first network device keeps a MAC address for the first workload as a source MAC address for the second packet and keeps a same time to live value for the second packet when sending the second packet via the layer 2 channel. 6. The method of claim 1 , wherein: the second packet is sent to the second network device, and the second network device sends the packet to the third workload in the second site. 7. The method of claim 1 , wherein: the third workload sends a third packet for the first workload, the second network device sends the third packet to the first workload via the layer 2 channel, and paths for the second packet and the third packet are symmetric in that the paths go through the layer 2 channel. 8. A non-transitory computer-readable storage medium containing instructions, that when executed, control a computer system to be operable for: setting, by a first network device in a first site, a first Internet Protocol (IP) address for an interface of the first network device to a value of a second IP address of a second network device in a second site; adding a set of policies in a policy table to cover a set of IP addresses used in the second site; adding a specific route into a routing table for the first network device for a third IP address associated with a first workload when it is detected that the first workload is migrated from the second site to the first site, wherein the first workload is on a stretched network between the first site and the second site that is coupled via a layer 2 channel, wherein: the specific route in the routing table configures the first network device to send a first packet from a second workload local to the first site to the first workload without sending the first packet to the second site, and the policy table configures the first network device to send a second packet from the first workload to a third workload in the second site via the layer 2 channel between the first site when an IP address for the third workload does not match an eligible route in the routing table. 9. The non-transitory computer-readable storage medium of claim 8 , wherein: the first network device is configured to review the policy table after not finding the eligible route in the routing table. 10. The non-transitory computer-readable storage medium of claim 8 , wherein: the first network device includes a first Media Access Control (MAC) address and the second network device includes a second MAC address, and the second packet is sent to the IP address of the third workload and a MAC address associated with the first MAC address of the first network device. 11. The non-transitory computer-readable storage medium of claim 8 , wherein the set of IP addresses found in the second site are for networks connected to the second network device in the second site. 12. The non-transitory computer-readable storage medium of claim 8 , wherein the first network device keeps a MAC address for the first workload as a source MAC address for the second packet and keeps a same time to live value for the second packet when sending the second packet via the layer 2 channel. 13. The non-transitory computer-readable storage medium of claim 8 , wherein: the second packet is sent to the second network device, and the second network device sends the packet to the third workload in the second site. 14. The non-transitory computer-readable storage medium of claim 8 , wherein: the third workload sends a third packet for the first workload, the second network device sends the third packet to the first workload via the layer 2 channel, and paths for the second packet and the third packet are symmetric in that the paths go through the layer 2 channel. 15. A method comprising: receiving, by a first network device, a packet, wherein a first workload is located in a network that is stretched across a first site and a second site, wherein the first network device includes an interface associated with an Internet Protocol (IP) address that is a same IP address as a second network device in the second site, and the packet includes a destination IP address; determining whether the destination IP address of the packet matches an eligible route in a routing table for the first network device; when the destination IP address of the packet does not match the eligible route, performing: reviewing a policy table to determine that the destination IP address matches a route for a policy in the policy table, wherein the policy table includes routes to cover a set of IP addresses used in the second site; and based on the determining the route in the policy table, sending the packet through a layer 2 channel to the second network device in the second site based on the policy, wherein the second network device sends the packet to a device; when the destination IP address of the packet does match the eligible route, sending the packet to the first workload without sending the packet to the second site when the destination IP address is for the first workload. 16. The method of claim 15 , wherein when the destination IP address of the packet does not match the eligible route: the packet comprises a first packet, the device sends a second packet to the first workload, and the second network device sends the second packet to the first workload via the layer 2 channel. 17. The method of claim 15 , wherein when the destination IP address of the packet does not match the eligible route, the first network device keeps a MAC address for the second packet as a source MAC address for the first workload and keeps a same time to live value for the packet when sending the pack
Layer-2 addresses, e.g. medium access control [MAC] addresses · CPC title
Internet protocol [IP] addresses · CPC title
Distributed routing · CPC title
Traffic policing · CPC title
based on parameters of servers, e.g. available memory or workload (monitoring of computer activity G06F11/30) · CPC title
Related publications grouped by family.
Answers are generated from the same data shown on this page.