Neural representation of automated conversational agents (chatbots)
US-2020335124-A1 · Oct 22, 2020 · US
US11244402B2 · US · B2
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Publication number | US-11244402-B2 |
| Application number | US-201816022194-A |
| Country | US |
| Kind code | B2 |
| Filing date | Jun 28, 2018 |
| Priority date | Jun 30, 2017 |
| Publication date | Feb 8, 2022 |
| Grant date | Feb 8, 2022 |
A practical reading order for non-experts. Skip the full description unless you need deep technical detail.
What the patent document calls the invention.
A short plain-language summary of the technical disclosure.
Who owns or filed the patent and who is credited as inventor.
Filing, priority, publication, and grant dates set the timeline.
The legal scope of protection — read this for what is actually claimed.
Technology tags used to group this patent with similar filings.
Prior art links and similar publications in this corpus.
Official abstract text for this publication.
A plurality of variable data of personal attribute information associated with at least one vehicle insurance user is received at a prediction server. Based on a service scenario requirement, a pre-constructed prediction algorithm is selected. The plurality of variable data is processed by one or more processors using the pre-constructed prediction algorithm. At least one prediction result is generated as the prediction server.
Opening claim text (preview).
What is claimed is: 1. A computer-implemented method that identifies an insurance risk prediction model that generates a more accurate risk prediction result for a respective insurance service risk assessment and that requires personal attribute information, the computer-implemented method comprising: receiving, at a prediction server, an insurance service scenario comprising variable data of personal attribute information associated with at least one insurance user; generating, at the prediction server, at least two candidate insurance risk prediction models comprising a first model and a second model, wherein the first model comprises a neural network, and wherein the second model is constructed by modeling at least one modeling target value using a gradient boosting decision tree (GBDT), and wherein the at least one modeling target value includes at least one of a loss ratio, a claim frequency, and a claim amount of the at least one insurance user; training, at the prediction server, the first model to include a learned continuous feature vector using a training objective function, wherein the training of the first model comprises: randomly initializing, at the prediction server, parameters of the first model, generating, at the prediction server, N bins each comprising data of a different feature type included in the variable data of personal attribute information, generating, at the prediction server, a first discrete feature vector comprising at least N elements corresponding to the N bins, mapping, at the prediction server, the first discrete feature vector and at least a second discrete feature vector to generate a candidate continuous feature vector, inputting, at the prediction server and into the first model, the candidate continuous feature vector representing the variable data of personal attribute information, obtaining, at the prediction server, output of the first model indicating a risk score based on the candidate continuous feature vector, and optimizing, at the prediction server, the training objective function associated with the first model based on the risk score, the parameters of the first model, and the at least one modeling target value; generating, at the prediction server, a first function output of a Tweedie regression objective function of the GBDT using the variable data of personal attribute information as an input to the second model; generating, at the prediction server, a second function output of the first model using the variable data of personal attribute information that was used as an input to the first model; generating, at the prediction server, a first statistical indicator based on the first function output and the input to the second model; generating, at the prediction server, a second statistical indicator based on the second function output and the input to the first model; selecting, at the prediction server and for the insurance service scenario, the insurance risk prediction model that is more statistically significant from the at least two candidate insurance risk prediction models based on a comparison of the first statistical indicator and the second statistical indicator; and generating, at the prediction server and for the insurance service scenario, an insurance risk prediction result of the at least one insurance user using the selected insurance risk prediction model. 2. The computer-implemented method of claim 1 , further comprising preprocessing the variable data of personal attribute information, wherein the preprocessing, at the prediction server, comprises at least one of: setting a weight for each personal attribute of the variable data; supplementing an incomplete value with a default value in the variable data; determining a selection of repeated variable data; processing interaction effects between the variable data; or generating new variable data based on the variable data. 3. The computer-implemented method of claim 1 , wherein at least one of the at least two candidate insurance risk prediction models is a trained generalized linear model. 4. The computer-implemented method of claim 1 , wherein the GBDT uses a gamma regression objective function as an objective function, and wherein the at least one modeling target value using the GBDT includes a difference between an actual modeling target value and a predicted modeling target value. 5. The computer-implemented method of claim 1 , wherein the training objective function is optimized using a Stochastic Gradient Descent. 6. A non-transitory, computer-readable medium that identifies an insurance risk prediction model that generates a more accurate risk prediction result for a respective insurance service risk assessment and that requires personal attribute information, the non-transitory, computer-readable medium storing one or more instructions executable by a computer processor, included in a prediction server, to perform operations comprising: receiving, at the prediction server, an insurance service scenario comprising variable data of personal attribute information associated with at least one insurance user; generating, at the prediction server, at least two candidate insurance risk prediction models comprising a first model and a second model, wherein the first model comprises a neural network, and wherein the second model is constructed by modeling at least one modeling target value using a gradient boosting decision tree (GBDT), and wherein the at least one modeling target value includes at least one of a loss ratio, a claim frequency, and a claim amount of the at least one insurance user; training, at the prediction server, the first model to include a learned continuous feature vector using a training objective function, wherein the training of the first model comprises: randomly initializing, at the prediction server, parameters of the first model, generating, at the prediction server, N bins each comprising data of a different feature type included in the variable data of personal attribute information, generating, at the prediction server, a first discrete feature vector comprising at least N elements corresponding to the N bins, mapping, at the prediction server, the first discrete feature vector and at least a second discrete feature vector to generate a candidate continuous feature vector, inputting, at the prediction server and into the first model, the candidate continuous feature vector representing the variable data of personal attribute information, obtaining, at the prediction server, output of the first model indicating a risk score based on the candidate continuous feature, and optimizing, at the prediction server, the training objective function associated with the first model based on the risk score, the parameters of the first model, and the at least one modeling target value; generating, at the prediction server, a first function output of a Tweedie regression objective function of the GBDT using the variable data of personal attribute information as an input to the second model; generating, at the prediction server, a second function output of the first model using the variable data of personal attribute information that was used as an input to the first model; generating, at the prediction server, a first statistical indicator based on the first function output and the input to the second model; generating, at the prediction server, a second statistical indicator based on the second function output and the input to the first model; selecting, at the prediction server and for the insurance service scenario, the insurance risk prediction model that is more statistically significant from the at least two candidate insurance risk prediction models based on a comparison of the first statistical indicator and the second
Generating training patterns; Bootstrap methods, e.g. bagging or boosting · CPC title
Risk analysis of enterprise or organisation activities · CPC title
Insurance · CPC title
Neural networks · CPC title
User profiles · CPC title
Related publications grouped by family.
Answers are generated from the same data shown on this page.