Peroxyformic acid compositions for membrane filtration cleaning
US-2017173642-A1 · Jun 22, 2017 · US
US11241658B2 · US · B2
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Publication number | US-11241658-B2 |
| Application number | US-201916274487-A |
| Country | US |
| Kind code | B2 |
| Filing date | Feb 13, 2019 |
| Priority date | Feb 14, 2018 |
| Publication date | Feb 8, 2022 |
| Grant date | Feb 8, 2022 |
A practical reading order for non-experts. Skip the full description unless you need deep technical detail.
What the patent document calls the invention.
A short plain-language summary of the technical disclosure.
Who owns or filed the patent and who is credited as inventor.
Filing, priority, publication, and grant dates set the timeline.
The legal scope of protection — read this for what is actually claimed.
Technology tags used to group this patent with similar filings.
Prior art links and similar publications in this corpus.
Official abstract text for this publication.
Methods of cleaning and sanitizing membrane modules within a membrane system are provided. A cleaning solution is circulated through the membrane system for about 2 to about 30 minutes. The cleaning solution includes organic acid and surfactant. A sanitizing solution is added to the cleaning solution to produce a boosted antimicrobial solution comprising an oxidizer. The boosted antimicrobial solution is then circulated through the membrane system for about 1 to about 20 minutes. The methods described are effective for reducing and removing bacterial spores and biofilms from membranes and improving membrane compatibility of effective cleaning and sanitizing solutions.
Opening claim text (preview).
The invention claimed is: 1. A method of cleaning and sanitizing a membrane element within a membrane system, the method comprising: circulating a cleaning solution through the membrane system for about 2 to about 30 minutes at a temperature of about 70° F. to about 125° F., the cleaning solution consisting essentially of about 0.1 wt. % to about 1 wt. % organic acid, 0 wt. % to about 0.25 wt. % hydrotrope coupler and about 0.01 wt. % to about 0.1 wt. % surfactant, wherein the organic acid in the cleaning solution is a combination of at least two organic acids selected from formic acid, citric acid, and lactic acid; adding a sanitizing solution to the cleaning solution to produce a boosted antimicrobial solution, the sanitizing solution comprising about 0.02 wt. % to about 0.15 wt. % oxidant, about 0.001 to about 0.03 wt. % acid, about 0.0005 wt % to about 0.01 wt. % stabilizer, and about 0.0001 wt % to about 0.05 wt. % percarboxylic acid; and circulating the boosted antimicrobial solution through the membrane system for about an additional 1 wt. % to about 20 minutes at a temperature of about 70° F. to about 125° F.; wherein the method results in at least a 3 log reduction of bacterial spores on the membrane. 2. The method of claim 1 , wherein the organic acid in the cleaning solution comprises a combination of citric acid and lactic acid. 3. The method of claim 1 , wherein the surfactant comprises an anionic surfactant. 4. The method of claim 1 , wherein the surfactant comprises a linear alkyl benzene sulfonate. 5. The method of claim 1 , wherein the surfactant comprises dodecyl benzene sulfonic acid (DDBSA). 6. The method of claim 1 , wherein the percarboxylic acid comprises peracetic acid. 7. The method of claim 1 , wherein the sanitizing solution comprises about 50 ppm to about 250 ppm percarboxylic acid. 8. The method of claim 1 , wherein the sanitizing solution comprises hydrogen peroxide, acetic acid, peracetic acid, and hydroxyethylidene diphosphonic acid. 9. The method of claim 1 , wherein the method results in at least a 1 log reduction of a biofilm, biofoulant, or slime forming bacteria. 10. The method of claim 1 , wherein the method results in at least 3 log reduction of a biofilm, biofoulant, or slime forming bacteria. 11. The method of claim 1 , wherein the combination of organic acids, anionic surfactant, and percarboxylic acid results in improved chemical compatibility with the membrane as compared to percarboxylic acid alone, where the improved chemical compatibility is shown by protein rejection of UF membranes or salt rejection of RO membranes. 12. The method of claim 1 , wherein the membrane system is a membrane filtration system in a dairy plant, brewery, winery, water plant, or food plant. 13. The method of claim 1 , wherein the method is a clean-in-place method. 14. The method of claim 1 , wherein the membrane is selected from microfiltration (MF) membranes, ultrafiltration (UF) membranes, nanofiltration (NF) membranes, and reverse osmosis (RO) membranes. 15. The method of claim 1 , wherein the membrane is made of polymer, ceramic, or stainless steel. 16. The method of claim 1 , wherein the membrane is configured as a spiral wound membrane, hollow fiber membrane, tubular membrane, or a plate and frame flat sheet membrane.
Hollow fibre modules · CPC title
Spiral-wound membrane modules · CPC title
Peroxide solutions · CPC title
Use of acids · CPC title
Reverse osmosis; Hyperfiltration {; Nanofiltration} · CPC title
Related publications grouped by family.
Answers are generated from the same data shown on this page.