Double bipolar configuration for atrial fibrillation annotation
US-10238309-B2 · Mar 26, 2019 · US
US11229395B2 · US · B2
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Publication number | US-11229395-B2 |
| Application number | US-201916267877-A |
| Country | US |
| Kind code | B2 |
| Filing date | Feb 5, 2019 |
| Priority date | Jan 29, 2014 |
| Publication date | Jan 25, 2022 |
| Grant date | Jan 25, 2022 |
A practical reading order for non-experts. Skip the full description unless you need deep technical detail.
What the patent document calls the invention.
A short plain-language summary of the technical disclosure.
Who owns or filed the patent and who is credited as inventor.
Filing, priority, publication, and grant dates set the timeline.
The legal scope of protection — read this for what is actually claimed.
Technology tags used to group this patent with similar filings.
Prior art links and similar publications in this corpus.
Official abstract text for this publication.
Catheterization of the heart is carried out by inserting a probe having electrodes into a heart of a living subject, recording a bipolar electrogram and a unipolar electrogram from one of the electrodes at a location in the heart, and defining a window of interest wherein a rate of change in a potential of the bipolar electrogram exceeds a predetermined value. An annotation is established in the unipolar electrogram, wherein the annotation denotes a maximum rate of change in a potential of the unipolar electrogram within the window of interest. A quality value is assigned to the annotation, and a 3-dimensional map is generated of a portion of the heart that includes the annotation and the quality value thereof.
Opening claim text (preview).
The invention claimed is: 1. A computer implemented method of determining quality of an annotation comprising: receiving an electrogram; detecting a plurality of QRS episodes in the electrogram and generating a mean QRS signal from the QRS episodes; subtracting the mean QRS signal from the plurality of QRS episodes detected in the electrogram to generate an adjusted electrogram in which potential annotations are exposed; identifying an annotation from the adjusted electrogram; estimating a quality of the annotation based on one or more parameters selected from: an amount and type of filtering required to determine the annotation; a position of a unipolar electrode generating its signal; a location in the heart from where a signal was acquired; a timing of the annotation; or whether the annotation is at or close to a time where a signal adjustment has been made; and assigning a value to the quality based on the one or more parameters; wherein the numerical value of the quality may be upgraded or downgraded based on the likelihood that the one or more parameters indicates an annotation. 2. The computer implemented method of claim 1 , wherein for the parameter a position of a unipolar electrode generating its signal, the value is downgraded when, from a position of a first electrode, it is considered physiologically unlikely that a signal from the first electrode will comprise an annotation. 3. The computer implemented method of claim 1 , further comprising: checking an inter-annotation distance, quality of a neighboring annotation and a timing of neighboring spatial annotations; adjusting the value of the quality based on the check. 4. The computer implemented method of claim 3 , wherein if a first electrode is surrounded by a plurality of second electrodes that are generating annotations with a high quality value, then the quality value of an annotation from the first electrode is increased. 5. The computer implemented method of claim 3 , wherein if a first electrode is surrounded by a plurality of second electrodes generating annotations with a low quality, then the quality of the given electrode annotation may be decreased. 6. The computer implemented method of claim 3 , wherein if a first electrode is surrounded by plurality of second electrodes generating annotations significantly outside a predetermined physiological range, then the quality of the given electrode is decreased. 7. The computer implemented method of claim 1 , further comprising evaluating the quality of an annotation with respect to a statistic describing other annotations. 8. The computer implemented method of claim 7 , wherein the statistic comprises a histogram of temporal cycle lengths of each annotation; and wherein annotations lying within predefined bounds of the histogram are considered to be valid, and those outside the bounds are considered to be erroneous.
for electrocardiography [ECG] · CPC title
Analysis of electrocardiograms · CPC title
Bioelectrical parameters, e.g. ECG, EEG · CPC title
Detecting fibrillation · CPC title
using Wavelet transforms · CPC title
Related publications grouped by family.
Answers are generated from the same data shown on this page.