Processing a request signal regarding operation of an autonomous vehicle
US-2018281817-A1 · Oct 4, 2018 · US
US11214272B2 · US · B2
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Publication number | US-11214272-B2 |
| Application number | US-201816139538-A |
| Country | US |
| Kind code | B2 |
| Filing date | Sep 24, 2018 |
| Priority date | Sep 24, 2018 |
| Publication date | Jan 4, 2022 |
| Grant date | Jan 4, 2022 |
A practical reading order for non-experts. Skip the full description unless you need deep technical detail.
What the patent document calls the invention.
A short plain-language summary of the technical disclosure.
Who owns or filed the patent and who is credited as inventor.
Filing, priority, publication, and grant dates set the timeline.
The legal scope of protection — read this for what is actually claimed.
Technology tags used to group this patent with similar filings.
Prior art links and similar publications in this corpus.
Official abstract text for this publication.
The disclosure provides for a method for determining a pullover spot for a vehicle. The method includes using a computing device to detect information related to a system of the vehicle or an environment surrounding the vehicle using a sensor of a vehicle and determine a local failure of the vehicle based on the information. The computing device may then be used to determine that the vehicle should pullover before completing a current trip related to transporting a passenger or good by comparing vehicle requirements for the trip with the local failure and determine a pullover spot by identifying a first area for the vehicle to park in part based on a second area being available for a second vehicle to pick up the passenger or good. The computing device may operate the vehicle to the pullover spot and transmit a request for a second vehicle.
Opening claim text (preview).
The invention claimed is: 1. A method comprising: detecting, by one or more computing devices, information related to one or more systems of a first vehicle or an environment surrounding the first vehicle using one or more sensors of the first vehicle; determining, by the one or more computing devices, a local failure at the first vehicle based on the information from the one or more sensors; determining, by the one or more computing devices, that the first vehicle should pullover before completing a current trip, during which a good is transported, by comparing vehicle requirements for the current trip with the local failure; determining, by the one or more computing devices, a first area for the first vehicle to park having a first minimum size, wherein the first minimum size is determined based on a size of the first vehicle, determining, by the one or more computing devices, a second area for a second vehicle to park and pick up the good, and determining, by the one or more computing devices, a third area adjacent to the first area for the good to be unloaded from the first vehicle having a second minimum size, wherein the second minimum size is determined based on a size of the good; transmitting first instructions by the one or more computing devices, to the first vehicle, the first instructions causing the first vehicle to park in the first area; transmitting, by the one or more computing devices, a request for the second vehicle to park in the second area; determining, by the one or more computing devices, that the good has transferred from the first vehicle parked in the first area to the second vehicle parked in the second area; and in response to the determining that that the good has transferred from the first vehicle to the second vehicle, transmitting second instructions, by the one or more computing devices, to the first vehicle, the second instructions causing the first vehicle to travel to a fallback location based on the local failure. 2. The method of claim 1 , wherein determining the local failure includes comparing the information with one or more set thresholds. 3. The method of claim 1 , further comprising determining, by the one or more computing devices, the vehicle requirements based on characteristics of roadways for the current trip and planned maneuvers for the first vehicle during the current trip. 4. The method of claim 1 , wherein determining the first area includes determining that the first area is within a maximum distance from a current location of the first vehicle. 5. The method of claim 1 , wherein determining the first area includes determining that the first area is reachable by the first vehicle within a maximum amount of time from when the local failure is detected based on the local failure. 6. The method of claim 1 , wherein the third area is within a maximum distance from a road. 7. The method of claim 1 , wherein the third area is within a maximum distance from the second area. 8. The method of claim 1 , wherein determining the first area includes determining that the second area has a third minimum size based on a size of the second vehicle. 9. The method of claim 1 , further comprising: when a wait time for the second vehicle is known and exceeds a maximum wait time threshold, determining that the second area is within a maximum distance from one or more facilities for the good. 10. The method of claim 1 , wherein transmitting the request for the second vehicle includes transmitting information related to the second area. 11. The method of claim 1 , wherein the determining, by the one or more computing devices, that the good has transferred from the first vehicle to the second vehicle further includes receiving, by the one or more computing devices, an indication that the transfer of the good has been completed. 12. The method of claim 1 , wherein the determining, by the one or more computing devices, that the good has transferred from the first vehicle to the second vehicle further includes detecting, by the one or more computing devices, that the good is located in the second vehicle. 13. The method of claim 1 , wherein the second minimum size is a predetermined amount more that a base area of the good to allow for a human mover to access and move the good. 14. The method of claim 1 , further comprising: receiving, by the one or more computing devices, information about a size of the second vehicle; and determining, by the one or more computing devices, a third minimum size of the second area based on the information about the size of the second vehicle. 15. The method of claim 14 , wherein the information indicates that there is more than one second vehicle and the sizes of each of the second vehicles. 16. A first vehicle capable of operating autonomously, the first vehicle comprising: one or more sensors configured to detect a status of one or more systems of the first vehicle or an environment surrounding the first vehicle; and one or more computing devices configured to: receive information from the one or more sensors; determine a local failure at the first vehicle based on the information from the one or more sensors; determine that the first vehicle should pullover before completing a current trip, during which a good is transported, by comparing vehicle requirements for the current trip with the local failure; determine a first area for the first vehicle to park having a first minimum size, wherein the first minimum size is determined based on a size of the first vehicle, determine a second area for a second vehicle to park and pick up the good, and determine a third area adjacent to the first area for the good to be unloaded from the first vehicle having a second minimum size, wherein the second minimum size is determined based on a size of the good; determine that the good has transferred from the first vehicle parked in the first area to the second vehicle parked in the second area; and in response to the determination that that the good has transferred from the first vehicle to the second vehicle, operate the first vehicle to travel to a fallback location based on the local failure. 17. A method comprising: detecting, by one or more computing devices, information related to one or more systems of a first vehicle or an environment surrounding the first vehicle using one or more sensors of the first vehicle; determining, by the one or more computing devices, a local failure at the first vehicle based on the information from the one or more sensors; determining, by the one or more computing devices, that the first vehicle should pullover before completing a current trip, during which a good is transported, by comparing vehicle requirements for the current trip with the local failure; determining, by the one or more computing devices, a first area for the first vehicle to park having a first minimum size, wherein the first minimum size is determined based on a size of the first vehicle, determining, by the one or more computing devices, a second area for a second vehicle to park and pick up the good, and determining, by the one or more computing devices, a third area adjacent to the first area for the good to be unloaded from the first vehicle having a second minimum size, wherein the second minimum size is determined based on a size of the good; transmitting first instructions by the one or more computing devices, to the first vehicle, the first instructions causing the first vehicle to park in the first area; transmitting, by the one or more computing devices, a request for the seco
Adapting to failures or work around with other constraints, e.g. circumvention by avoiding use of failed parts · CPC title
Taxi operations · CPC title
Fail-safe or redundant systems, e.g. limp-home or backup systems · CPC title
Dispatching vehicles on the basis of a location, e.g. taxi dispatching · CPC title
Delivery operations · CPC title
Related publications grouped by family.
Answers are generated from the same data shown on this page.