Systems and methods for maximizing tote contents
US-2018141754-A1 · May 24, 2018 · US
US11148884B2 · US · B2
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Publication number | US-11148884-B2 |
| Application number | US-201916426769-A |
| Country | US |
| Kind code | B2 |
| Filing date | May 30, 2019 |
| Priority date | Jun 1, 2018 |
| Publication date | Oct 19, 2021 |
| Grant date | Oct 19, 2021 |
A practical reading order for non-experts. Skip the full description unless you need deep technical detail.
What the patent document calls the invention.
A short plain-language summary of the technical disclosure.
Who owns or filed the patent and who is credited as inventor.
Filing, priority, publication, and grant dates set the timeline.
The legal scope of protection — read this for what is actually claimed.
Technology tags used to group this patent with similar filings.
Prior art links and similar publications in this corpus.
Official abstract text for this publication.
A method for operating an order-picking system ( 100 ) is described, comprising: providing goods gathered in batches in a batch buffer ( 1 ), batch-wise sorting of the goods in a matrix sorter ( 2 ), the goods in the order-picking system ( 100 ) being conveyed by a multiplicity of transport units which have in each case a receiving unit for receiving the goods and the transport units in the matrix sorter ( 2 ) are conveyed at least in sections by a matrix conveyor ( 22 ), wherein a control unit ( 7 ′) dynamically controls the conveying speed of the matrix conveyor ( 22 ) in such a manner that the conveying speed is dependent on at least one parameter of the conveyed transport units and/or goods.
Opening claim text (preview).
What is claimed: 1. A method for operating an order-picking system ( 100 , 100 ′), comprising: conveying goods ( 10 . 1 - 10 . 3 ) in the order-picking system ( 100 , 100 ′) by a multiplicity of transport units ( 9 . 1 - 9 . 3 ), each including a receiving unit ( 9 . 15 , 9 . 25 , 9 . 35 ) for receiving one of the goods ( 10 . 1 - 10 . 3 ), gathering batches of the goods ( 10 . 1 - 10 . 3 ) in a batch buffer ( 1 , 1 ′), batch-wise sorting of the goods ( 10 . 1 - 10 . 3 ) in a matrix sorter ( 2 , 2 ′), conveying the transport units ( 9 . 1 - 9 . 3 ) in the matrix sorter ( 2 , 2 ′) at least in sections by a matrix conveyor ( 22 , 22 . 1 ′- 22 . 4 ′), and a control unit ( 7 , 7 ′) dynamically controlling a conveying speed of the matrix conveyor ( 22 , 22 . 1 ′- 22 . 4 ′) so that the conveying speed is dependent on at least one parameter of the conveyed transport units ( 9 . 1 - 9 . 3 ) and/or goods ( 10 . 1 - 10 . 3 ) in each of the batches. 2. The method as claimed in claim 1 , wherein the control unit ( 7 , 7 ′) controls the conveying speed of the matrix conveyor ( 22 , 22 . 1 ′- 22 . 4 ′) so that the conveying speed within a batch is in each case constant. 3. The method as claimed in claim 1 , wherein the control unit ( 7 , 7 ′) controls the conveying speed of the matrix conveyor ( 22 , 22 . 1 ′- 22 . 4 ′) as a function of a weight of at least one of the conveyed transport units ( 9 . 1 - 9 . 3 ) and/or goods ( 10 . 1 - 10 . 3 ), the conveying speed of the matrix conveyor ( 22 , 22 . 1 ′- 22 . 4 ′) being increased with reducing weight of the transport units ( 9 . 1 - 9 . 3 ) and/or goods ( 10 . 1 - 10 . 3 ). 4. The method as claimed in claim 3 , wherein the control unit ( 7 , 7 ′) controls the conveying speed of the matrix conveyor ( 22 , 22 . 1 ′- 22 . 4 ′) as a function of the weight of a heaviest transport unit ( 9 . 1 - 9 . 3 ) and/or good ( 10 . 1 - 10 . 3 ) of a batch. 5. The method as claimed in claim 1 , wherein the control unit ( 7 , 7 ′) controls the conveying speed of the matrix conveyor ( 22 , 22 . 1 ′- 22 . 4 ′) as a function of the size of at least one of the conveyed transport units ( 9 . 1 - 9 . 3 ) and/or goods ( 10 . 1 - 10 . 3 ), the conveying speed of the matrix conveyor ( 22 , 22 . 1 ′- 22 . 4 ′) being increased with reducing size of the transport units ( 9 . 1 - 9 . 3 ) and/or goods ( 10 . 1 - 10 . 3 ). 6. The method as claimed in claim 5 , wherein the control unit ( 7 , 7 ′) controls the conveying speed of the matrix conveyor ( 22 , 22 . 1 ′- 22 . 4 ′) as a function of a size of the largest transport unit ( 9 . 1 - 9 . 3 ) and/or good ( 10 . 1 - 10 . 3 ) of a batch. 7. The method as claimed in claim 1 , wherein the order-picking system ( 100 , 100 ′) includes in a loading station and/or in a packing station downstream of the matrix sorter ( 2 , 2 ′), further conveyors ( 6 . 1 - 6 . 3 ) which convey the transport units ( 9 . 1 - 9 . 3 ) with a constant conveying speed and the control unit ( 7 , 7 ′) controls the conveying speed of the matrix conveyor ( 22 , 22 . 1 ′- 22 . 4 ′) in such a manner that the conveying speed of the matrix conveyor ( 22 , 22 . 1 ′- 22 . 4 ′) in at least one batch is higher than the constant conveying speed of the further conveyors ( 6 . 1 - 6 . 3 ). 8. The method as claimed in claim 1 , wherein parameters, including weight and/or size, of the transport units ( 9 . 1 - 9 . 3 ) and/or goods ( 10 . 1 - 10 . 3 ) traveling into the matrix sorter ( 2 , 2 ′) are determined by a measuring device ( 81 , 82 ) and transmitted to the control unit ( 7 , 7 ′). 9. The method as claimed in claim 1 , wherein the control unit ( 7 ′) receives parameters, including weight and/or size, of the transport units and/or goods traveling into the matrix sorter ( 2 ′) from a database ( 102 ′). 10. The method as claimed in claim 1 , wherein the matrix sorter ( 2 ) comprises a multiplicity of sorting stages ( 21 . 1 - 21 . 3 ), the matrix conveyor ( 22 ) guiding the transport units ( 9 . 1 - 9 . 3 ) in each case toward one sorting stage ( 21 . 1 - 21 . 3 ) and again away from the sorting stage ( 21 . 1 - 21 . 3 ). 11. The method as claimed in claim 1 , wherein the matrix sorter ( 2 ′) comprises a multiplicity of sorting stages ( 21 . 1 ′- 21 . 3 ′) and a multiplicity of matrix conveyors ( 22 . 1 ′- 22 . 4 ′) which are assigned in each case to a sorting stage ( 21 . 1 ′- 21 . 3 ′) or two sorting stages ( 21 . 1 ′- 21 . 3 ′) and the control unit ( 7 ′) individually controls the conveying speed of each matrix conveyor ( 22 . 1 ′- 22 . 4 ′). 12. The method as claimed in claim 1 , wherein the control unit ( 7 , 7 ′) controls the conveying speed of the matrix conveyor ( 22 , 22 . 1 ′- 22 . 4 ′) as a function of at least one of: a weight of a heaviest transport unit ( 9 . 1 - 9 . 3 ) and/or good ( 10 . 1 - 10 . 3 ) of a batch; or a size of a largest transport unit ( 9 . 1 - 9 . 3 ) and/or good ( 10 . 1 - 10 . 3 ) of a batch. 13. An order-picking system ( 100 , 100 ′), comprising: a batch buffer ( 1 , 1 ′) for the provision of goods ( 10 . 1 - 10 . 3 ) gathered in batches, a multiplicity of transport units ( 9 . 1 - 9 . 3 ) which have in each case each including a receiving unit ( 9 . 15 , 9 . 25 , 9 . 35 ) for receiving the goods ( 10 . 1 - 10 . 3 ), a matrix sorter ( 2 , 2 ′) configured to batch-wise sort the goods ( 10 . 1 - 10 . 3 ), the matrix sorter ( 2 , 2 ′) comprising at least one matrix conveyor ( 22 , 22 . 1 ′- 22 . 4 ′) for conveying the transport units ( 9 . 1 - 9 . 3 ), and a control unit ( 7 , 7 ′) which is configured to dynamically control the conveying speed of the matrix conveyor ( 22 , 22 . 1 ′- 22 . 4 ′) in such a manner that the conveying speed is dependent on at least one parameter of the conveyed transport units ( 9 . 1 - 9 . 3 ) and/or goods ( 10 . 1 - 10 . 3 ) of each of the batches. 14. The order-picking system ( 100 , 100 ′) as claimed in claim 13 , wherein a transport unit ( 9 . 1 - 9 . 3 ) comprises in each case at least one in a rail ( 101 ) conveyable carriage ( 9 . 11 , 9 . 12 , 9 . 21 ), suspended, and the receiving unit ( 9 . 15 , 9 . 25 , 9 . 35 ) is connected in each case to the carriage ( 9 . 11 , 9 . 12 , 9 . 21 ). 15. The order-picking system ( 100 , 100 ′) as claimed in claim 13 , wherein the order-picking system ( 100 , 100 ′) includes in a loading station and/or in a packing station downstream of the matrix sorter ( 2 , 2 ′), further conveyors ( 6 . 1 - 6 . 3 ) of a continuous nature which are configured to convey the transport units ( 9 . 1 - 9 . 3 ) with a constant conveying speed, the control unit ( 7 , 7 ′) being configured to control the conveying speed of the matrix conveyor ( 22 , 22 . 1 ′- 22 . 4 ′) in such a manner that the conveying speed of the matrix conveyor ( 22 , 22 . 1 ′- 22 . 4 ′) in at least one batch is higher than the constant conveying speed of the further conveyors ( 6 . 1 - 6 . 3 ). 16. The order-picking system ( 100 , 100 ′) as claimed in claim 13 , wherein the matrix conveyor ( 22 , 22 . 1 ′- 22 . 4 ′) is a continuous conveyor which is configured to guide the transport units ( 9 . 1 - 9 . 3 ) toward a sorting stage ( 21 . 1 - 21 . 3 , 21 . 1 ′- 21 . 3 ′) and again away from a sorting stage ( 21 . 1 - 21 . 3 , 21 . 1 ′- 21 . 3 ′). 17. The order-picking system ( 100 , 100 ′) as claimed in claim 13 , wherein a sorting stage ( 21 . 1 - 21 . 3 , 21 . 1 ′- 21 . 3 ′) of the matrix sorter ( 2 , 2 ′) includes a multiplicity of linear buffer sections ( 21 . 11 , 21 . 21 , 21 . 31 , 21 . 11 ′, 21 . 21 ′, 21 . 31 ′) which are connected by switch points to the
using electronic computing means only · CPC title
for weighing during motion ({G01G19/022, G01G19/045,} G01G19/04, G01G19/07 take precedence {; weighing a continuous stream material during flow G01G11/00; check weighing of materials dispensed into removable containers G01G15/00}) · CPC title
with suspended load carriers · CPC title
Control devices operated by article or material being fed, conveyed or discharged {(and controlling the discharging devices B65G47/42)} · CPC title
the orders being assembled on a commissioning conveyor · CPC title
Related publications grouped by family.
Answers are generated from the same data shown on this page.