Methods and Systems for Proactively Monitoring Crude Quality Assurance
US-2019062645-A1 · Feb 28, 2019 · US
US11092935B2 · US · B2
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Publication number | US-11092935-B2 |
| Application number | US-201816052163-A |
| Country | US |
| Kind code | B2 |
| Filing date | Aug 1, 2018 |
| Priority date | Aug 1, 2018 |
| Publication date | Aug 17, 2021 |
| Grant date | Aug 17, 2021 |
A practical reading order for non-experts. Skip the full description unless you need deep technical detail.
What the patent document calls the invention.
A short plain-language summary of the technical disclosure.
Who owns or filed the patent and who is credited as inventor.
Filing, priority, publication, and grant dates set the timeline.
The legal scope of protection — read this for what is actually claimed.
Technology tags used to group this patent with similar filings.
Prior art links and similar publications in this corpus.
Official abstract text for this publication.
Systems and techniques for demulsifier automation of the wet crude handling facilities can include a computer-implemented method. Demulsifier automation parameters for automating demulsifier injection points of a wet crude handling facility are determined. The determining includes performing a data convolution and a smoothening of inlet demulsifier automation parameters. Performing the demulsifier automation of the wet crude handling facility, includes, for each demulsifier, the following: A current state of the demulsifier is identified based on the demulsifier automation parameters. Demulsifier calculation input parameters are determined, including performing a convolution and a smoothening of the demulsifier calculation input parameters. A demulsifier dosage rate is calculated using the determined demulsifier calculation input parameters. A state dependent dosage multiplication factor is applied to the demulsifier based on the current state based on the calculated demulsifier dosage rate.
Opening claim text (preview).
What is claimed is: 1. A computer-implemented method, comprising: determining demulsifier automation parameters for automating demulsifier injection points of a wet crude handling facility, the determining including performing a data convolution and a smoothening of inlet demulsifier automation parameters; and performing the demulsifier automation of the wet crude handling facility, including, for each demulsifier: identifying a current state of the demulsifier, the identifying based on the demulsifier automation parameters; determining demulsifier calculation input parameters, including performing a convolution and a smoothening of the demulsifier calculation input parameters; calculating, using the determined demulsifier calculation input parameters, a demulsifier dosage rate; applying, to the demulsifier and based on the current state, a state dependent dosage multiplication factor based on the calculated demulsifier dosage rate. 2. The computer-implemented method of claim 1 , wherein states of the demulsifier include a normal state, an abnormal state, and a transit state. 3. The computer-implemented method of claim 2 , further comprising performing a state transition from the current state to a new state based on the current state and a determination that a boundary condition has been breached or, when the current state is the transit state, has become normalized. 4. The computer-implemented method of claim 3 , wherein state transitions are state-dependent and include: a state transition from the normal state to the abnormal state when the boundary condition is breached; a state transition from the transit state to the abnormal state when the boundary condition is breached; a state transition from the abnormal state to the transit state when the boundary condition is normalized; and a state transition from the transit state to the normal state when the boundary condition and the transit setpoint are normal. 5. The computer-implemented method of claim 4 , wherein, when the current state is the abnormal state, transitioning to the normal state cannot occur without first transitioning to the transit state. 6. The computer-implemented method of claim 1 , wherein the input parameters include a crude temperature and a gas-oil separator plant (GOSP) total liquid flowrate. 7. The computer-implemented method of claim 6 , wherein the GOSP total liquid flowrate is a sum of a net crude export rate and a net water injection rate. 8. The computer-implemented method of claim 3 , wherein the boundary conditions include threshold values for a temperature, a dehydrator voltage, a desalter voltage, a dehydrator water outlet flow, and a basic sediment and water (BS&W) at a desalter outlet.
by treating with water · CPC title
Controlling or regulating · CPC title
Auxiliary equipment particularly adapted for use with liquid-separating apparatus, e.g. control circuits · CPC title
with separation aids · CPC title
Metal content · CPC title
Related publications grouped by family.
Answers are generated from the same data shown on this page.