Apparatus for optimizing inspection of exterior of target object and method thereof
US-2020292463-A1 · Sep 17, 2020 · US
US11087452B2 · US · B2
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Publication number | US-11087452-B2 |
| Application number | US-201916248897-A |
| Country | US |
| Kind code | B2 |
| Filing date | Jan 16, 2019 |
| Priority date | Feb 5, 2018 |
| Publication date | Aug 10, 2021 |
| Grant date | Aug 10, 2021 |
A practical reading order for non-experts. Skip the full description unless you need deep technical detail.
What the patent document calls the invention.
A short plain-language summary of the technical disclosure.
Who owns or filed the patent and who is credited as inventor.
Filing, priority, publication, and grant dates set the timeline.
The legal scope of protection — read this for what is actually claimed.
Technology tags used to group this patent with similar filings.
Prior art links and similar publications in this corpus.
Official abstract text for this publication.
A false alarm reduction system and method are provided for reducing false alarms in an automatic defect detection system. The false alarm reduction system includes a defect detection system, generating a list of image boxes marking detected potential defects in an input image. The false alarm reduction system further includes a feature extractor, transforming each of the image boxes in the list into a respective set of numerical features. The false alarm reduction system also includes a classifier, computing as a classification outcome for the each of the image boxes whether the detected potential defect is a true defect or a false alarm responsive to the respective set of numerical features for each of the image boxes.
Opening claim text (preview).
What is claimed is: 1. A false alarm reduction system for reducing false alarms in an automatic defect detection system, the false alarm reduction system comprising: a defect detection system, generating a list of image boxes marking detected potential defects in an input image; a feature extractor, transforming each of the image boxes in the list into a respective set of numerical features; and a classifier, computing as a classification outcome for the each of the image boxes whether the detected potential defect is a true defect or a false alarm responsive to respective values of the respective set of numerical features for each of the image boxes. 2. The false alarm reduction system of claim 1 , wherein the defect detection system generates the list of boxes marking the potential defects using at least one object selected from the group consisting of an contextual autoencoder, a deep autoencoder, a one-class Support Vector Machine, a nearest neighbor classifier, a binary classifier, and a multi-class classifier. 3. The false alarm reduction system of claim 2 , wherein the numeral features comprise features selected from the group consisting of an autoencoder output, features from intermediate layers of one or more pre-trained deep neural networks, scale invariant feature transform features, and histogram of Gabor functions features. 4. The false alarm reduction system of claim 1 , wherein the classifier computes the classification outcome using a one-class classifier selected from the group consisting of a one-class Support Vector Machine classifier and a Nearest-Neighbor classifier. 5. The false alarm reduction system of claim 4 , wherein the classifier is trained by using as training examples defects generated by the defect detection system over a set of images known to be defect free. 6. The false alarm reduction system of claim 1 , wherein the classifier computes the classification outcome using a classifier selected from the group consisting of a binary classifier and a multi-class classifier. 7. The false alarm reduction system of claim 1 , wherein the classifier comprises an object selected from the group consisting of a Support Vector Machine and a deep neural network. 8. The false alarm reduction system of claim 7 , wherein the classifier is trained by using as training examples all defects generated by the defect detection system over a set of images known to be free of defects, combined with examples known to include true defects. 9. The false alarm reduction system of claim 8 , wherein the true defects are obtained by operating the false alarm reduction system without false alarm reduction for a period of time. 10. The false alarm reduction system of claim 1 , wherein the defect detection system further includes a correction element for performing a corrective action responsive to the classification outcome being the true defect. 11. A false alarm reduction method for reducing false alarms in an automatic defect detection system, the false alarm reduction method comprising: generating, by a defect detection system, a list of image boxes marking detected potential defects in an input image; transforming, by a feature extractor, each of the image boxes in the list into a respective set of numerical features; and computing, by a classifier, as a classification outcome for the each of the image boxes whether the detected potential defect is a true defect or a false alarm responsive to respective values of the respective set of numerical features for each of the image boxes. 12. The false alarm reduction method of claim 11 , wherein the list of boxes marking the potential defects are generated using at least one object selected from the group consisting of an contextual autoencoder, a deep autoencoder, a one-class Support Vector Machine, a nearest neighbor classifier, a binary classifier, and a multi-class classifier. 13. The false alarm reduction method of claim 12 , wherein the numeral features comprise features selected from the group consisting of an autoencoder output, features from intermediate layers of one or more pre-trained deep neural networks, scale invariant feature transform features, and histogram of Gabor functions features. 14. The false alarm reduction method of claim 11 , wherein the classifier computes the classification outcome using a one-class classifier selected from the group consisting of a one-class Support Vector Machine classifier and a Nearest-Neighbor classifier. 15. The false alarm reduction method of claim 14 , further comprising training the classifier by using as training examples defects generated by the defect detection system over a set of images known to be defect free. 16. The false alarm reduction method of claim 11 , wherein the classifier computes the classification outcome using a classifier selected from the group consisting of a binary classifier and a multi-class classifier. 17. The false alarm reduction method of claim 11 , wherein the classifier comprises an object selected from the group consisting of a Support Vector Machine and a deep neural network. 18. The false alarm reduction method of claim 17 , further comprising training the classifier by using as training examples all defects generated by the defect detection system over a set of images known to be free of defects, combined with examples known to include true defects. 19. The false alarm reduction method of claim 18 , wherein the true defects are obtained by operating the false alarm reduction system without false alarm reduction for a period of time. 20. The false alarm reduction method of claim 11 , further comprising performing a corrective action responsive to the classification outcome being the true defect.
using neural networks · CPC title
using classification, e.g. of video objects · CPC title
using an image reference approach · CPC title
Industrial image inspection · CPC title
Single-class perspective, e.g. one-against-all classification; Novelty detection; Outlier detection · CPC title
Related publications grouped by family.
Answers are generated from the same data shown on this page.