Systems and methods for host cell improvement utilizing epistatic effects

US11085040B2 · US · B2

Patent metadata
FieldValue
Publication numberUS-11085040-B2
Application numberUS-201916665764-A
CountryUS
Kind codeB2
Filing dateOct 28, 2019
Priority dateDec 7, 2015
Publication dateAug 10, 2021
Grant dateAug 10, 2021

How to read this patent

A practical reading order for non-experts. Skip the full description unless you need deep technical detail.

  1. Title

    What the patent document calls the invention.

  2. Abstract

    A short plain-language summary of the technical disclosure.

  3. Assignees and inventors

    Who owns or filed the patent and who is credited as inventor.

  4. Key dates

    Filing, priority, publication, and grant dates set the timeline.

  5. First independent claim

    The legal scope of protection — read this for what is actually claimed.

  6. CPC / IPC classifications

    Technology tags used to group this patent with similar filings.

  7. Citations and related patents

    Prior art links and similar publications in this corpus.

Abstract

Official abstract text for this publication.

The present disclosure provides systems and methods for host cell improvement utilizing epistatic effects. The systems and methods described herein are host cell agnostic and therefore can be implemented across taxa. Furthermore, the disclosed systems and methods can be implemented to modulate or improve any host cell parameter of interest.

First claim

Opening claim text (preview).

What is claimed is: 1. A computer-implemented method for applying epistatic effects in the iterative improvement of a host cell, the method comprising: a. providing data representing measured performance in response to a plurality of genetic changes, wherein each genetic change is made to a plurality of host background strains; b. generating a selected combination of at least two genetic changes based at least in part upon a degree of dissimilarity between the corresponding responsive performance measures of the plurality of genetic changes from the data provided in step (a); wherein the degree of dissimilarity is the degree to which the at least two genetic changes affect their corresponding performance measures differently when compared across the plurality of host background strains; c. designing genetic changes to a host cell that include the selected combination of genetic changes; and d. manufacturing the host cell designed in step (c). 2. The method of claim 1 , wherein the degree of dissimilarity is determined by calculating the cosine similarity of the measured performance of the plurality of genetic changes across the plurality of host background strains. 3. The method of claim 1 , wherein the degree of dissimilarity is determined by calculating a distance measure of a cluster of the measured performance of the plurality of genetic changes across the plurality of host background strains, wherein the measured performance is clustered by a k-mean or a hierarchical agglomerative clustering method, and wherein the distance measure is Euclidean, or hamming. 4. The method of claim 1 , wherein the plurality of host background strains comprise host cells that are genetically identical except for the genetic change in step (a) and an added secondary genetic change introduced to create genetic diversity in said plurality of host background strains. 5. The method of claim 4 , wherein the secondary genetic change is selected from the group consisting of: a single nucleotide polymorphism, nucleotide sequence insertion, nucleotide sequence deletion, and nucleotide sequence replacements. 6. The method of claim 4 , wherein the secondary genetic change comprises one or more heterologous promoters from a promoter ladder operably linked to an endogenous target gene. 7. The method of claim 1 , wherein the genetic changes in step (a) are selected from the group consisting of: a single nucleotide polymorphism, nucleotide sequence insertion, nucleotide sequence deletion, and nucleotide sequence replacements. 8. The method of claim 1 , wherein the genetic changes in step (a) comprise one or more heterologous promoters from a promoter ladder operably linked to an endogenous target gene. 9. The method of claim 1 , wherein the combination of at least two genetic changes in step (b) is also selected based on each genetic change's individual ability to improve the measured performance of their host background strains compared to otherwise identical control host strains lacking said genetic change. 10. The method of claim 1 , wherein the manufactured host cell comprising the selected combination of genetic changes exhibits an improved phenotypic performance over an otherwise identical host cell that comprises only one of the selected genetic changes. 11. The method of claim 10 , wherein the improved phenotypic performance is selected from the group consisting of: volumetric productivity of a product of interest, specific productivity of a product of interest, yield of a product of interest, titer of a product of interest, and combinations thereof. 12. The method of claim 10 , wherein the improved phenotypic performance is increased or more efficient production of a product of interest, said product of interest selected from the group consisting of: a small molecule, enzyme, protein, peptide, amino acid, organic acid, synthetic compound, fuel, alcohol, primary extracellular metabolite, secondary extracellular metabolite, intracellular component molecule, and combinations thereof. 13. The method of claim 10 , wherein the improved phenotypic performance is: increased production of lysine or citric acid or more efficient production of lysine or citric acid. 14. A system for applying epistatic effects in the iterative improvement of candidate microbial strains, the system comprising: one or more processors; and one or more memories operatively coupled to at least one of the one or more processors and having instructions stored thereon that, when executed by at least one of the one or more processors, cause the system to: a. provide data representing measured performance in response to a plurality of genetic changes, wherein each genetic change is made to a plurality of host background strains; b. generate a selected combination of at least two genetic changes based at least in part upon a degree of dissimilarity between the corresponding performance measures of the plurality of genetic changes from the data provided in step (a); wherein the degree of dissimilarity is the degree to which the at least two genetic changes affect their corresponding responsive performance measures differently when compared across the plurality of host background strains; c. design genetic changes to a host cell that include the selected combination of genetic changes; and d. manufacture the host cell designed in step (c). 15. The system of claim 14 , wherein the degree of dissimilarity is determined by calculating the cosine similarity of the measured performance of the plurality of genetic changes across the plurality of host background strains. 16. The system of claim 14 , wherein the degree of dissimilarity is determined by calculating a distance measure of a cluster of the measured performance of the at least two genetic changes across the plurality of host background strains, wherein the measured performance is clustered by a k-mean or a hierarchical agglomerative clustering method, and wherein the distance measure is Euclidean, or hamming. 17. The system of claim 14 , wherein the plurality of host background strains comprise host cells that are genetically identical except for the genetic change in step (a) and an added secondary genetic change introduced to create genetic diversity in said plurality of host background strains. 18. The system of claim 14 , wherein the system manufactures the host cell by contacting DNA effectuating the genetic changes designed by the system in step (c) with a host cell, said contacting effectuated by automated liquid and particle handling robotics in communication with the processor. 19. The system of claim 18 , wherein the system further comprises an electroporator. 20. The system of claim 18 , wherein the system further comprises a thermocycler. 21. The system of claim 14 , wherein the system manufactures the host cell through ballistic transformation of cells via ballistic robotics in communication with the processor. 22. A computer-implemented method for applying epistatic effects in the iterative improvement of a host cell, the method comprising: a. providing data representing measured performance in response to a plurality of genetic changes, each made to a plurality of host background strains; b. generating a selected combination of at least two genetic changes based at least in part upon a degree of dissimilarity between the corresponding responsive performance measures of the plurality of genetic changes from the data provided in step (a); wherein the degree of dissimilarity i

Assignees

Inventors

Classifications

  • Reagents, handling or storing thereof · CPC title

  • Communications between instruments or with remote terminals · CPC title

  • Directional evolution of libraries, e.g. evolution of libraries is achieved by mutagenesis and screening or selection of mixed population of organisms · CPC title

  • Cooling means; Cryo cooling · CPC title

  • Tissue, human, animal or plant cell, or virus culture apparatus · CPC title

Patent family

Related publications grouped by family.

External sources

Frequently asked questions

Answers are generated from the same data shown on this page.

What does patent US11085040B2 cover?
The present disclosure provides systems and methods for host cell improvement utilizing epistatic effects. The systems and methods described herein are host cell agnostic and therefore can be implemented across taxa. Furthermore, the disclosed systems and methods can be implemented to modulate or improve any host cell parameter of interest.
Who is the assignee on this patent?
Zymergen Inc
What technology area does this patent fall under?
Primary CPC classification C12N15/1058. Mapped technology areas include Chemistry & Metallurgy.
When was this patent published?
Publication date Tue Aug 10 2021 00:00:00 GMT+0000 (Coordinated Universal Time) (B2). Legal status and post-grant events are not shown on this page.
What related patents are in patentsdb?
We list 12 related publications on this page (citations in our corpus or others sharing the same primary CPC).