Diverse redundancy approach for safety critical applications
US-2019196926-A1 · Jun 27, 2019 · US
US11067717B2 · US · B2
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Publication number | US-11067717-B2 |
| Application number | US-201916422644-A |
| Country | US |
| Kind code | B2 |
| Filing date | May 24, 2019 |
| Priority date | Jun 25, 2018 |
| Publication date | Jul 20, 2021 |
| Grant date | Jul 20, 2021 |
A practical reading order for non-experts. Skip the full description unless you need deep technical detail.
What the patent document calls the invention.
A short plain-language summary of the technical disclosure.
Who owns or filed the patent and who is credited as inventor.
Filing, priority, publication, and grant dates set the timeline.
The legal scope of protection — read this for what is actually claimed.
Technology tags used to group this patent with similar filings.
Prior art links and similar publications in this corpus.
Official abstract text for this publication.
An optoelectronic sensor for detecting objects in a monitored zone is provided having at least one light receiver for generating measurement data from received light from the monitored zone and having a safe evaluation unit that has at least two processing channels for a redundant processing of the measurement data and having a comparison unit for comparing processing results of the processing channels to uncover errors in a processing channel 30a-b. The processing channels are here each configured for a determination of a signature with respect to their processing results; and the comparator unit is configured for a comparison of the signatures.
Opening claim text (preview).
The invention claimed is: 1. An optoelectronic sensor for detecting objects in a monitored zone, the optoelectronic sensor having at least one light receiver for generating measurement data from received light from the monitored zone; a safe evaluation unit that has at least two processing channels for a redundant processing of the measurement data; and a comparison unit for comparing processing results of the processing channels to uncover errors in a processing channel, wherein the processing channels are each configured for a determination of a signature with respect to their processing results; and wherein the comparison unit is configured for a comparison of the signatures, the signature obtained by aggregating at least a subset of safety-relevant data in small data blocks, wherein a change in the safety-relevant data renders a change of the signature, and wherein the processing channels each have a plurality of processing stages and are configured to determine a signature in a plurality of processing stages for the processing results of said processing stage. 2. The sensor in accordance with claim 1 , wherein the sensor is a camera having at least one image sensor as the light receiver that generates image data as measurement data. 3. The sensor in accordance with claim 2 , in which camera the processing channels have at least some of the following processing stages: reading of raw images, preprocessing of raw images, generation of a depth map by a stereoscopic algorithm, generation of a detection map having relevant detected objects, determining shortest distances of the relevant objects from hazard sites, and deriving a safety related response from the shortest distances. 4. The sensor in accordance with claim 2 , wherein the camera is a stereo camera. 5. The sensor in accordance with claim 1 , wherein the signature has a hash value calculated from the processing results. 6. The sensor in accordance with claim 5 , wherein a cyclic redundancy test is used as the hash function. 7. The sensor in accordance with claim 1 , wherein the processing channels each have a plurality of processing stages and are configured to determine a signature in all the processing stages for the processing results of said processing stage. 8. The sensor in accordance with claim 1 , wherein processing channels are configured to collect signatures from different processing stages. 9. The sensor in accordance with claim 8 , wherein signatures are each forwarded to the next processing stage. 10. The sensor in accordance claim 1 , wherein the processing channels have a signature store in which the processing stages store their respective signatures. 11. The sensor in accordance with claim 1 , wherein the processing channels are configured to determine the signature in at least one processing stage via the processing results of the processing stage and to determine a signature from a preceding processing stage. 12. The sensor in accordance claim 1 , wherein the processing channels have processing stages on different elements. 13. The sensor in accordance with claim 1 , wherein the processing channels are configured to forward processing results and/or signatures between the processing stages over an unsafe communication link. 14. The sensor in accordance with claim 1 , wherein the comparison unit is configured only to compare signatures at the end of the processing channels. 15. The sensor in accordance with claim 1 , wherein the safe evaluation unit is configured to forward signatures to the comparison unit via an unsafe communication link. 16. The sensor in accordance with claim 1 , wherein the processing channels are configured to channel test data into the measurement data or processing results. 17. The sensor in accordance with claim 16 , wherein the processing channels are also configured to determine the signature via processing results of the test data. 18. The sensor in accordance with claim 1 , wherein the processing channels are configured to provide data and/or signatures with an error correction option for the transmission. 19. The sensor in accordance with claim 1 , wherein the processing channels are configured to delete no longer required portions of the processing results. 20. The sensor in accordance with claim 1 , wherein the safe evaluation unit has more than two processing channels and the comparison unit is configured for a voting process for evaluating signatures. 21. A method for a safe evaluation of measurement data of an optoelectronic sensor, wherein the measurement data are redundantly processed in at least two processing channels and the processing results of the processing channels are compared to uncover errors, wherein, in the processing channels, a respective signature of their processing results is determined and only the signatures are compared, the signature obtained by aggregating at least a subset of safety-relevant data in small data blocks, wherein a change in the safety-relevant data renders a change of the signature, and wherein the processing channels each have a plurality of processing stages and are configured to determine a signature in a plurality of processing stages for the processing results of said processing stage.
Detection or correction of errors, e.g. by rescanning the pattern or by human intervention; Evaluation of the quality of the acquired patterns · CPC title
of extracted features · CPC title
Hardware or software architectures specially adapted for image or video understanding · CPC title
Surveillance or monitoring of activities, e.g. for recognising suspicious objects (recognising microscopic objects G06V20/69) · CPC title
Detecting, e.g. by using light barriers (by reflection from the object G01S17/00) · CPC title
Related publications grouped by family.
Answers are generated from the same data shown on this page.