Systems and methods for modeling neural architecture

US11062450B2 · US · B2

Patent metadata
FieldValue
Publication numberUS-11062450-B2
Application numberUS-201716332280-A
CountryUS
Kind codeB2
Filing dateSep 13, 2017
Priority dateSep 13, 2016
Publication dateJul 13, 2021
Grant dateJul 13, 2021

How to read this patent

A practical reading order for non-experts. Skip the full description unless you need deep technical detail.

  1. Title

    What the patent document calls the invention.

  2. Abstract

    A short plain-language summary of the technical disclosure.

  3. Assignees and inventors

    Who owns or filed the patent and who is credited as inventor.

  4. Key dates

    Filing, priority, publication, and grant dates set the timeline.

  5. First independent claim

    The legal scope of protection — read this for what is actually claimed.

  6. CPC / IPC classifications

    Technology tags used to group this patent with similar filings.

  7. Citations and related patents

    Prior art links and similar publications in this corpus.

Abstract

Official abstract text for this publication.

Systems and methods are described herein for modeling neural architecture. Regions of interest of a brain of a subject can be identified based on image data characterizing the brain of the subject. the identified regions of interest can be mapped to a connectivity matrix. The connectivity matrix can be a weighted and undirected network. A multivariate transformation can be applied to the connectivity matrix to transform the connectivity matrix into a partial correlation matrix. The multivariate transformation can maintain a positive definite constraint for the connectivity matrix. The partial correlation matrix can be transformed into a neural model indicative of the connectivity matrix.

First claim

Opening claim text (preview).

What is claimed is: 1. A computer-implemented method for modeling neural architecture comprising: identifying, by one or more processors, regions of interest of a brain of a subject based on image data characterizing the brain of the subject; mapping, by the one or more processors, the regions of interest to a connectivity matrix, wherein the connectivity matrix is a weighted and directed or undirected network; applying, by the one or more processors, a multivariate transformation to the connectivity matrix to transform the connectivity matrix into a partial correlation matrix, wherein the multivariate transformation maintains a positive definite constraint for the connectivity matrix; and transforming, by the one or more processors, the partial correlation matrix into a neural model indicative of the connectivity matrix. 2. The computer-implemented method of claim 1 , wherein the transforming the partial correlation matrix into the neural model indicative of the connectivity matrix is based on statistics determined according to the connectivity matrix; further comprising, transforming, by the one or more processors, the statistics into biomarker parameters. 3. The computer-implemented method of claim 2 , wherein the statistics comprise endogenous statistics. 4. The computer-implemented method of claim 3 , wherein the endogenous statistics comprise one of two-stars, transitive triads, intercept term, and any of a class of statistics computed as sums of sub-network products or transformations thereof. 5. The computer-implemented method of claim 3 , wherein the statistics further comprise exogenous statistics. 6. The computer-implemented method of claim 1 , further comprising scaling, by the one or more processors, the connectivity matrix prior to the multivariate transformation. 7. The computer-implemented method of claim 1 , further comprising determining and mapping, by the one or more processors, the regions of interest according to an activity of the subject. 8. The computer-implemented method of claim 1 , wherein the regions of interest are determined and mapped according to an atlas associated with the subject. 9. The computer-implemented method of claim 8 , wherein the atlas delineates one of a whole brain network, Default Mode Network, a Dorsal Attention Network, a Frontoparietal Control Network, a Ventral Attention Network, a Visual Network, an Auditory Network, a Reward Network, a Subcortical Network, a Salience Network, and any other network or subnetwork that captures functional or structural connectivity, and a combination thereof. 10. The computer-implemented method of claim 1 , further comprising: identifying, by the one or more processors, distinct regions of interest in the image data; and mapping, by the one or more processors, the distinct regions of interest of the image data to the connectivity matrix, wherein the regions of interest and the distinct regions of interest provide a joint modeling framework. 11. The computer-implemented method of claim 1 , wherein transforming, by the one or more processors, the partial correlation matrix into the neural model indicative of the connectivity matrix is according to a descriptive neural modeling engine, wherein values of the descriptive statistics provide an indication of a neurological condition and/or a related severity of the neurological condition when compared against a reference distribution of the descriptive statistics, wherein descriptive statistic corresponds to a biomarker for the neurological condition. 12. The computer-implemented method of claim 1 , wherein transforming the partial correlation matrix into the neural model indicative of the connectivity matrix is according to a neurological generalized exponential random graph model (neuro-GERGM) algorithm. 13. The computer-implemented method of claim 1 , wherein the image data comprises one of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) data, functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) image data, diffusion weighted imaging (DWI) data, diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) data, electromyogram (EMG) data, electroencephalogram (EEG) data, positron emission tomography (PET) data, magnetoencephalography (MEG) data, Electrocorticography (ECoG) data, ultrasound imaging data, and a combination thereof.

Assignees

Inventors

Classifications

  • A61B5/7267Primary

    involving training the classification device · CPC title

  • G06T7/0014Primary

    using an image reference approach · CPC title

  • using statistics or function optimisation, e.g. modelling of probability density functions · CPC title

  • for evaluating statistical data {, e.g. average values, frequency distributions, probability functions, regression analysis (forecasting specially adapted for a specific administrative, business or logistic context G06Q10/04)} · CPC title

  • Functional imaging of brain activation · CPC title

Patent family

Related publications grouped by family.

External sources

Frequently asked questions

Answers are generated from the same data shown on this page.

What does patent US11062450B2 cover?
Systems and methods are described herein for modeling neural architecture. Regions of interest of a brain of a subject can be identified based on image data characterizing the brain of the subject. the identified regions of interest can be mapped to a connectivity matrix. The connectivity matrix can be a weighted and undirected network. A multivariate transformation can be applied to the connec…
Who is the assignee on this patent?
Ohio State Innovation Foundation, Penn State Res Found, Univ Of North Carolina, and 1 more
What technology area does this patent fall under?
Primary CPC classification A61B5/7267. Mapped technology areas include Human Necessities.
When was this patent published?
Publication date Tue Jul 13 2021 00:00:00 GMT+0000 (Coordinated Universal Time) (B2). Legal status and post-grant events are not shown on this page.
What related patents are in patentsdb?
We list 12 related publications on this page (citations in our corpus or others sharing the same primary CPC).