Adaptive trailing edge actuator system and method
US-2015083853-A1 · Mar 26, 2015 · US
US11059569B1 · US · B1
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Publication number | US-11059569-B1 |
| Application number | US-201816231385-A |
| Country | US |
| Kind code | B1 |
| Filing date | Dec 21, 2018 |
| Priority date | Dec 29, 2017 |
| Publication date | Jul 13, 2021 |
| Grant date | Jul 13, 2021 |
A practical reading order for non-experts. Skip the full description unless you need deep technical detail.
What the patent document calls the invention.
A short plain-language summary of the technical disclosure.
Who owns or filed the patent and who is credited as inventor.
Filing, priority, publication, and grant dates set the timeline.
The legal scope of protection — read this for what is actually claimed.
Technology tags used to group this patent with similar filings.
Prior art links and similar publications in this corpus.
Official abstract text for this publication.
A flight control system for an aircraft having a multi-functional flight control surface. The aircraft has at least one multi-functional flight control surface formed by a sequence of flaps. The shape of each multi-functional flight control surface may be configured by a flight control to simultaneously adjust a trajectory of the aircraft in two or more of a pitch direction, a roll direction, and a yaw direction. The flight control for operating said the multi-functional flight control surface responds to both pilot commands and machine-generated commands. The machine-generated commands configure the shape of the surface of each multi-functional flight control surface in real-time based, at least in part, upon a set of flight objectives comprising: (a) minimizing drag of the aircraft, (b) aeroelastic modal suppression for the aircraft, and (c) maneuver load alleviation in the aircraft.
Opening claim text (preview).
What is claimed is: 1. A flight control system for instructing an aircraft, the aircraft comprising at least one multi-functional flight control surface, wherein said at least one multi-functional flight control surface comprises a sequence of flaps, wherein a shape of each surface, of said at least one multi-functional flight control surface, may be configured by the flight control to adjust a trajectory of the aircraft in two or more of a pitch direction, a roll direction, and a yaw direction, the flight control system comprising: one or more processors; and one or more non-transitory computer-readable storage mediums storing one or more sequences of instructions, which when executed by one or more processors, cause: the flight control system to operate said at least one multi-functional flight control surface, wherein said flight control system responds to both pilot commands and machine-generated commands, and wherein said machine-generated commands configure the shape of said each surface of said at least one multi-functional flight control surface in real-time based, at least in part, upon a set of flight objectives comprising: (a) minimizing drag of said aircraft, (b) aeroelastic modal suppression for said aircraft, and (c) maneuver load alleviation in said aircraft, wherein said flight control system adjusts the shape of said at least one multi-functional flight control surface to minimize the maneuver load upon the aircraft using a least-square adaptive control method. 2. The flight control system of claim 1 , wherein said flight control system determines, in real-time, a set of multiple competing requirements for each of said set of flight objectives to determine how to instruct said at least one multi-functional flight control surface in a manner that possess the best compromise for said set of multiple competing requirements. 3. The flight control system of claim 1 , wherein said flight control system specifies deflection commands for said at least one multi-functional flight control surface to change a lift distribution that results in a reduction in a wing root bending moment of an aircraft wing by shifting a lift distribution toward the inboard of the aircraft wing. 4. The flight control system of claim 1 , wherein execution of the one or more sequences of instructions further cause the flight control system to: upon determining that the aircraft is experiencing a gust, prioritize the maneuver load alleviation flight objective over the drag minimization flight objective to reduce a structural load placed upon the aircraft. 5. The flight control of claim 1 , wherein execution of the one or more sequences of instructions further cause the flight control system to: upon determining that the aircraft is no longer experiencing a gust, increase a priority applied to the drag minimization flight objective, and decrease the priority applied to the maneuver load alleviation flight objective, to enable the aircraft to operate in a fuel economy mode. 6. The flight control system of claim 1 , wherein said at least one multi-functional flight control surface comprises one or more accelerometers, and wherein said set of flight objectives further includes minimizing a gust load upon the aircraft. 7. The flight control system of claim 6 , wherein said flight control system adjusts the shape of said at least one multi-functional flight control surface to minimize the gust load upon the aircraft by estimating the gust load upon the aircraft using measurements taken by said one or more accelerometers and a least-squares gradient. 8. A non-transitory computer readable storage medium storing one or more sequences of instructions for a flight control system for instructing an aircraft, the aircraft comprising: at least one multi-functional flight control surface, wherein said at least one multi-functional flight control surface comprises a sequence of flaps, wherein a shape of each surface, of said at least one multi-functional flight control surface, may be configured by a flight control to adjust a trajectory of the aircraft in two or more of a pitch direction, a roll direction, and a yaw direction, and wherein execution of the one or more sequences of instructions cause: the flight control system to operate said at least one multi-functional flight control surface, wherein said flight control system responds to both pilot commands and machine-generated commands, and wherein said machine-generated commands configure the shape of said each surface of said at least one multi-functional flight control surface in real-time based, at least in part, upon a set of flight objectives comprising: (a) minimizing drag of said aircraft, (b) aeroelastic modal suppression for said aircraft, and (c) maneuver load alleviation in said aircraft, wherein said flight control system adjusts the shape of said at least one multi-functional flight control surface to minimize the maneuver load upon the aircraft using a least-square adaptive control method. 9. The non-transitory computer readable storage medium of claim 8 , wherein said flight control system determines, in real-time, a set of multiple competing requirements for each of said set of flight objectives to determine how to instruct said at least one multi-functional flight control surface in a manner that possess the best compromise for said set of multiple competing requirements. 10. The non-transitory computer readable storage medium of claim 8 , wherein said flight control system specifies deflection commands for said at least one multi-functional flight control surface to change a lift distribution that results in a reduction in a wing root bending moment of an aircraft wing by shifting a lift distribution toward the inboard of the aircraft wing. 11. The non-transitory computer readable storage medium of claim 8 , wherein execution of the one or more sequences of instructions further cause: upon determining that the aircraft is experiencing a gust, prioritizing the maneuver load alleviation flight objective over the drag minimization flight objective to reduce a structural load placed upon the aircraft. 12. The non-transitory computer readable storage medium of claim 8 , wherein execution of the one or more sequences of instructions further cause: upon determining that the aircraft is no longer experiencing a gust, increasing a priority applied to the drag minimization flight objective, and decreasing the priority applied to the maneuver load alleviation flight objective, to enable the aircraft to operate in a fuel economy mode. 13. The non-transitory computer readable storage medium of claim 8 , wherein said at least one multi-functional flight control surface comprises one or more accelerometers, and wherein said set of flight objectives further includes minimizing a gust load upon the aircraft. 14. The non-transitory computer readable storage medium of claim 13 , wherein said flight control system adjusts the shape of said at least one multi-functional flight control surface to minimize the gust load upon the aircraft by estimating the gust load upon the aircraft using measurements taken by said one or more accelerometers and a least-squares gradient. 15. A method for instructing an aircraft, the aircraft comprising at least one multi-functional flight control surface, wherein said at least one multi-functional flight control surface comprises a sequence of flaps, wherein a shape of each surface, of said at least one multi-functional flight control surface, may be configured by a flight control system to adjust a trajectory of the aircraft in two or more of a pitch direction,
Weight reduction · CPC title
Drag reduction · CPC title
Ailerons · CPC title
by changing shape according to the speed, e.g. by morphing · CPC title
actuated automatically, e.g. responsive to gust detectors · CPC title
Related publications grouped by family.
Answers are generated from the same data shown on this page.