Matching Bias and Relevancy in Reviews with Artificial Intelligence
US-2020394265-A1 · Dec 17, 2020 · US
US11048741B2 · US · B2
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Publication number | US-11048741-B2 |
| Application number | US-201916399184-A |
| Country | US |
| Kind code | B2 |
| Filing date | Apr 30, 2019 |
| Priority date | Apr 30, 2019 |
| Publication date | Jun 29, 2021 |
| Grant date | Jun 29, 2021 |
A practical reading order for non-experts. Skip the full description unless you need deep technical detail.
What the patent document calls the invention.
A short plain-language summary of the technical disclosure.
Who owns or filed the patent and who is credited as inventor.
Filing, priority, publication, and grant dates set the timeline.
The legal scope of protection — read this for what is actually claimed.
Technology tags used to group this patent with similar filings.
Prior art links and similar publications in this corpus.
Official abstract text for this publication.
A bias detection method, system, and computer program product include creating a context of an applicant based on a profile of the applicant and a context of a reviewer based on a profile of the reviewer, predicting a probability of overlapping data points between the applicant and the reviewer, building enriched embeddings for a deep learning model based on the context of the applicant, the context of the reviewer, the overlapping data points, and text from a review and a final decision by the reviewer, and calculating a bias score via a deep learning model run over the enriched embeddings.
Opening claim text (preview).
What is claimed is: 1. A computer-implemented bias detection method for generating a contextual measurement of class and methodological bias in a review processes, the method comprising: creating a context of an applicant based on a profile of the applicant and a context of a reviewer based on a profile of the reviewer; predicting a probability of overlapping data points between the applicant and the reviewer; building enriched embeddings for a deep learning model based on the context of the applicant, the context of the reviewer, the overlapping data points, and text from a review and a final decision by the reviewer; and calculating a bias score via the deep learning model run over the enriched embeddings, wherein the bias score includes a combination of: a class bias; a methodological bias; an ecological fallacy; a reviewer bias; a reviewer variation; and an implicit bias. 2. The method of claim 1 , further comprising outputting the bias score to a profile of the reviewer if the bias score is greater than a preset value. 3. The method of claim 1 , further comprising generating a report that highlights instances of bias in the review by the reviewer based on the bias score. 4. The method of claim 2 , further comprising generating a report that highlights instances of bias in the review by the reviewer based on the output bias score. 5. The method of claim 1 , wherein the bias score includes a combination of: a class bias; and a position related parameter. 6. The method of claim 1 , embodied in a cloud-computing environment. 7. A computer program product for bias detection, the computer program product comprising a computer-readable storage medium having program instructions embodied therewith for generating a contextual measurement of class and methodological bias in a review processes, the program instructions executable by a computer to cause the computer to perform: creating a context of an applicant based on a profile of the applicant and a context of a reviewer based on a profile of the reviewer; predicting a probability of overlapping data points between the applicant and the reviewer; building enriched embeddings for a deep learning model based on the context of the applicant, the context of the reviewer, the overlapping data points, and text from a review and a final decision by the reviewer; and calculating a bias score via the deep learning model run over the enriched embeddings, wherein the bias score includes a combination of: a class bias; a methodological bias; an ecological fallacy; a reviewer bias; a reviewer variation; and an implicit bias. 8. The computer program product of claim 7 , further comprising outputting the bias score to a profile of the reviewer if the bias score is greater than a preset value. 9. The computer program product of claim 7 , further comprising generating a report that highlights instances of bias in the review by the reviewer based on the bias score. 10. The computer program product of claim 8 , further comprising generating a report that highlights instances of bias in the review by the reviewer based on the output bias score. 11. The computer program product of claim 7 , wherein the bias score includes a combination of: a class bias; and a position related parameter. 12. A bias detection system for generating a contextual measurement of class and methodological bias in a review processes, the system comprising: a processor; and a memory, the memory storing instructions to cause the processor to perform: creating a context of an applicant based on a profile of the applicant and a context of a reviewer based on a profile of the reviewer; predicting a probability of overlapping data points between the applicant and the reviewer; building enriched embeddings for a deep learning model based on the context of the applicant, the context of the reviewer, the overlapping data points, and text from a review and a final decision by the reviewer; and calculating a bias score via the deep learning model run over the enriched embeddings, wherein the bias score includes a combination of: a class bias; a methodological bias; an ecological fallacy; a reviewer bias; a reviewer variation; and an implicit bias. 13. The system of claim 12 , further comprising outputting the bias score to a profile of the reviewer if the bias score is greater than a preset value. 14. The system of claim 12 , further comprising generating a report that highlights instances of bias in the review by the reviewer based on the bias score. 15. The system of claim 13 , further comprising generating a report that highlights instances of bias in the review by the reviewer based on the output bias score. 16. The system of claim 12 , wherein the bias score includes a combination of: a class bias; and a position related parameter. 17. The system of claim 12 , embodied in a cloud-computing environment.
Combinations of networks · CPC title
Supervised learning · CPC title
characterised by memory or gating, e.g. long short-term memory [LSTM] or gated recurrent units [GRU] · CPC title
using statistical methods · CPC title
Lexical analysis, e.g. tokenisation or collocates · CPC title
Related publications grouped by family.
Answers are generated from the same data shown on this page.