Efficient rewrite using larger codeword sizes

US11031042B2 · US · B2

Patent metadata
FieldValue
Publication numberUS-11031042-B2
Application numberUS-201916450814-A
CountryUS
Kind codeB2
Filing dateJun 24, 2019
Priority dateDec 19, 2017
Publication dateJun 8, 2021
Grant dateJun 8, 2021

How to read this patent

A practical reading order for non-experts. Skip the full description unless you need deep technical detail.

  1. Title

    What the patent document calls the invention.

  2. Abstract

    A short plain-language summary of the technical disclosure.

  3. Assignees and inventors

    Who owns or filed the patent and who is credited as inventor.

  4. Key dates

    Filing, priority, publication, and grant dates set the timeline.

  5. First independent claim

    The legal scope of protection — read this for what is actually claimed.

  6. CPC / IPC classifications

    Technology tags used to group this patent with similar filings.

  7. Citations and related patents

    Prior art links and similar publications in this corpus.

Abstract

Official abstract text for this publication.

In one embodiment, a method includes writing a data set to a sequential access medium. The method also includes reading the data set after being written in a read-while-write process to identify faulty encoded data blocks, each of the faulty encoded data blocks including at least one faulty codeword. Moreover, the method includes rewriting a correct version of a first of the encoded data blocks in a first encoded data block set to the rewrite area of the sequential access medium selected from a predetermined subset of logical tracks. The predetermined subset of logical tracks includes D1+D2+1 logical tracks. Only one encoded data block from a particular sub data set is rewritten in a single encoded data block set in the rewrite area.

First claim

Opening claim text (preview).

What is claimed is: 1. A system, comprising: a magnetic head having a plurality of write transducers numbering at least M and a plurality of read transducers numbering at least M, each read transducer being configured to read data from a sequential access medium after being written thereto by a corresponding write transducer; and a controller and logic integrated with and/or executable by the controller, the logic being configured to: write, using the write transducers, a data set to a sequential access medium, the data set comprising a number of sub data sets of fixed size, each sub data set comprising a plurality of encoded data blocks comprising codewords, each codeword comprising a predetermined number of symbols; read, using the read transducers, the data set in a read-while-write process to identify faulty encoded data blocks, each of the faulty encoded data blocks comprising at least one faulty codeword; select a particular logical track from a predetermined subset of logical tracks in a rewrite area of the sequential access medium to rewrite the faulty encoded data blocks, the rewrite area being positioned subsequent to a position of the data set on the sequential access medium, wherein the predetermined subset of logical tracks includes D1+D2+1 logical tracks, and wherein 0<D1+D2<M/4; and rewrite a correct version of a first of the encoded data blocks identified as faulty in a first encoded data block set to the rewrite area of the sequential access medium, wherein only one encoded data block from a particular sub data set is rewritten in a single encoded data block set in the rewrite area. 2. The system as recited in claim 1 , wherein each of the symbols are 10 bits in size, and wherein the logic is further configured to: select a second logical track from the predetermined subset of logical tracks in the rewrite area of the sequential access medium; and rewrite a correct version of a second of the faulty encoded data blocks within the first encoded data block set to the second logical track in response to the first encoded data block being from a different sub data set than the second of the encoded data blocks. 3. The system as recited in claim 1 , wherein each of the predetermined subsets of logical tracks comprises three logical tracks in sequence corresponding to D1=1 and D2=1. 4. The system as recited in claim 1 , wherein each of the predetermined subsets of logical tracks comprises five logical tracks in sequence corresponding to D1=2 and D2=2. 5. The system as recited in claim 1 , wherein each encoded data block is written to the sequential access medium as four symbol-interleaved Reed-Solomon RS(240,228) C1 codewords over a Galois Field GF(256). 6. The system as recited in claim 1 , wherein each encoded data block is written to the sequential access medium as two symbol-interleaved Reed-Solomon RS(384,364) C1 codewords over a Galois Field GF(1024). 7. The system as recited in claim 1 , wherein each encoded data block is written to the sequential access medium as one Reed-Solomon RS(768,728) C1 codeword over a Galois Field GF(1024). 8. The system as recited in claim 1 , wherein the logic is further configured to decode the data set read from the sequential access medium to determine the faulty encoded data blocks, wherein an encoded data block is determined to be faulty in response to detection of a threshold number of errors therein after the encoded data block is decoded. 9. A method, comprising: writing, using M write transducers of a magnetic head, a data set to a sequential access medium, the data set comprising a number of sub data sets of fixed size, each sub data set comprising a plurality of encoded data blocks comprising codewords, each codeword comprising a predetermined number of symbols; reading, using M read transducers of the magnetic head, the data set in a read-while-write process to identify faulty encoded data blocks, each of the faulty encoded data blocks comprising at least one faulty codeword; selecting a particular logical track from a predetermined subset of logical tracks in a rewrite area of the sequential access medium to rewrite the faulty encoded data blocks, the rewrite area being positioned subsequent to a position of the data set on the sequential access medium, wherein the predetermined subset of logical tracks includes D1+D2+1 logical tracks, and wherein 0<D1+D2<M/4; and rewriting a correct version of a first of the encoded data blocks identified as faulty in a first encoded data block set to the rewrite area of the sequential access medium, wherein only one encoded data block from a particular sub data set is rewritten in a single encoded data block set in the rewrite area. 10. The method as recited in claim 9 , wherein each of the symbols are 10 bits in size, the method further comprising: selecting a second logical track from the predetermined subset of logical tracks in the rewrite area of the sequential access medium; and rewriting a correct version of a second of the faulty encoded data blocks within the first encoded data block set to the second logical track in response to the first encoded data block being from a different sub data set than the second of the encoded data blocks. 11. The method as recited in claim 9 , wherein each of the predetermined subsets of logical tracks comprises three logical tracks in sequence corresponding to D1=1 and D2=1. 12. The method as recited in claim 9 , wherein each of the predetermined subsets of logical tracks comprises five logical tracks in sequence corresponding to D1=2 and D2=2. 13. The method as recited in claim 9 , wherein each encoded data block is written to the sequential access medium as four symbol-interleaved Reed-Solomon RS(240,228) C1 codewords over a Galois Field GF(256). 14. The method as recited in claim 9 , wherein each encoded data block is written to the sequential access medium as two symbol-interleaved Reed-Solomon RS(384,364) C1 codewords over a Galois Field GF(1024). 15. The method as recited in claim 9 , wherein each encoded data block is written to the sequential access medium as one Reed-Solomon RS(768,728) C1 codeword over a Galois Field GF(1024). 16. The method as recited in claim 9 , further comprising decoding the data set read from the sequential access medium to determine the faulty encoded data blocks, wherein an encoded data block is determined to be faulty in response to detection of a threshold number of errors therein after the encoded data block is decoded. 17. A computer program product, the computer program product comprising a computer readable storage medium having program instructions embodied therewith, the embodied program instructions being executable by a processor to cause the processor to: write, by the processor using M write transducers of a magnetic head, a data set to a sequential access medium, the data set comprising a number of sub data sets of fixed size, each sub data set comprising a plurality of encoded data blocks comprising codewords, each codeword comprising a predetermined number of symbols; read, by the processor using M read transducers of the magnetic head, the data set in a read-while-write process to identify faulty encoded data blocks, each of the faulty encoded data blocks comprising at least one faulty codeword; select, by the processor, a particular logical track from a predetermined subset of logical tracks in a rewrite area of the sequential access medium to rewrite the faulty encoded data blocks, the rewrite area being positioned subsequent to a position of the data set on the sequential access med

Assignees

Inventors

Classifications

  • using a cross-interleaved Reed Solomon [CIRC] · CPC title

  • by adding special lists or symbols to the coded information (G11B20/1806, G11B20/1866 take precedence) · CPC title

  • with tapes · CPC title

  • Reed-Solomon codes · CPC title

  • on tapes · CPC title

Patent family

Related publications grouped by family.

External sources

Frequently asked questions

Answers are generated from the same data shown on this page.

What does patent US11031042B2 cover?
In one embodiment, a method includes writing a data set to a sequential access medium. The method also includes reading the data set after being written in a read-while-write process to identify faulty encoded data blocks, each of the faulty encoded data blocks including at least one faulty codeword. Moreover, the method includes rewriting a correct version of a first of the encoded data blocks…
Who is the assignee on this patent?
IBM
What technology area does this patent fall under?
Primary CPC classification G11B20/1833. Mapped technology areas include Physics.
When was this patent published?
Publication date Tue Jun 08 2021 00:00:00 GMT+0000 (Coordinated Universal Time) (B2). Legal status and post-grant events are not shown on this page.
What related patents are in patentsdb?
We list 8 related publications on this page (citations in our corpus or others sharing the same primary CPC).