Method, apparatus and device for evaluating image tracking effectiveness and readable storage medium

US11023781B2 · US · B2

Patent metadata
FieldValue
Publication numberUS-11023781-B2
Application numberUS-201916510164-A
CountryUS
Kind codeB2
Filing dateJul 12, 2019
Priority dateAug 3, 2018
Publication dateJun 1, 2021
Grant dateJun 1, 2021

How to read this patent

A practical reading order for non-experts. Skip the full description unless you need deep technical detail.

  1. Title

    What the patent document calls the invention.

  2. Abstract

    A short plain-language summary of the technical disclosure.

  3. Assignees and inventors

    Who owns or filed the patent and who is credited as inventor.

  4. Key dates

    Filing, priority, publication, and grant dates set the timeline.

  5. First independent claim

    The legal scope of protection — read this for what is actually claimed.

  6. CPC / IPC classifications

    Technology tags used to group this patent with similar filings.

  7. Citations and related patents

    Prior art links and similar publications in this corpus.

Abstract

Official abstract text for this publication.

The present disclosure provides a method, an apparatus, a device for evaluating image tracking effectiveness and a readable storage medium. The method includes: extracting feature points from a target image according to a predefined algorithm; determining first texture information for the target image according to the feature points; processing the target image according to a predefined processing policy to derive a contrast image, and determining second texture information for the target image according to the contrast image; and rating the target image according to the first texture information and the second texture information. In the solution provide by the present disclosure, the tracking effectiveness for the target image can be known without having to place the target image into any actual product, nor having to wait until the product has been finalized before the target image tracking effectiveness is determined. Moreover, efficiency can be enhanced when evaluating image tracking effectiveness.

First claim

Opening claim text (preview).

What is claimed is: 1. A method for evaluating image tracking effectiveness, comprising: extracting feature points from a target image according to a predefined algorithm; determining first texture information for the target image according to the feature points; processing the target image according to a predefined processing policy to derive a contrast image, and determining second texture information for the target image according to the contrast image; and rating tracking effectiveness for the target image according to the first texture information and the second texture information; wherein the determining first texture information for the target image according to the feature points comprises: determining a first texture rating for the target image according to the feature points, wherein the first texture rating comprises at least one of the following texture ratings: a texture richness rating, a texture distribution rating, and a texture repetition rating; the determining second texture information for the target image according to the contrast image comprises: determining a texture contrast rating for the target image according to the contrast image; correspondingly, the rating tracking effectiveness for the target image according to the first texture information and the second texture information comprises: determining a lowest rating among the first texture rating and the texture contrast rating as a rating for the target image. 2. The method according to claim 1 , wherein the determining a texture richness rating for the target image according to the feature points comprises: deriving a quantity of the feature points; and determining the texture richness rating according to the quantity. 3. The method according to claim 1 , wherein the determining a texture distribution rating for the target image according to the feature points comprises: equally partitioning the target image into a number of grids; deriving a quantity of the feature points in each of the grids, and determining the grids in which the quantity of the feature points is above a quantity threshold as valid grids; and determining the texture distribution rating according to a quantity of the valid grids and a total quantity of the grids. 4. The method according to claim 1 , wherein the determining a texture distribution rating for the target image according to the feature points comprises: determining, for the feature points, projection points on a diagonal line of the target image according to a predefined angle; and determining the texture distribution rating according to distribution of the projection points along the diagonal line. 5. The method according to claim 1 , wherein the determining a texture repetition rating for the target image according to the feature point comprises: deriving a first feature value from within a predefined range surrounding the first feature point, and deriving a second feature value from within a predefined range surrounding the second feature point; determining whether the first feature point and the second feature point are similar feature points according to the first feature value and the second feature value; and determining the texture repetition rating according to a quantity of the similar feature points and a total quantity of the feature points. 6. The method according to claim 5 , further comprising: determining a spatial distance between the first feature point and the second feature point; wherein the determining whether the first feature point and the second feature point are similar feature points according to the first feature value and the second feature value comprises: when the first feature value and the second feature value differ by less than a first threshold and the spatial distance is above a second threshold, determining the first feature point and the second feature point to be similar feature points. 7. The method according to claim 1 , wherein the processing the target image according to a predefined processing policy to derive a contrast image comprises: deriving a reference image by setting a predefined image to be a background image for the target image; and injecting noise into the reference image to derive the contrast image. 8. The method according to claim 7 , wherein the injecting noise into the reference image comprises: injecting lighting noise and/or Gaussian noise into the reference image. 9. The method according to claim 7 , wherein the determining a texture contrast rating for the target image according to the contrast image comprises: determining a first similarity according to the reference image and the target image; determining a second similarity according to the contrast image and the target image; and determining the texture contrast rating for the target image according to the first similarity and the second similarity. 10. An apparatus for evaluating image tracking effectiveness, comprising: a memory, a processor, and a computer program stored on the memory and operable on the processor, wherein the processor, when running the computer program, is configured to: extract feature points from a target image according to a predefined algorithm; determine first texture information for the target image according to the feature points; process the target image according to a predefined processing policy to derive a contrast image, and determine second texture information for the target image according to the contrast image; and rate tracking effectiveness for the target image according to the first texture information and the second texture information; wherein the processor is further configured to: determine a first texture rating for the target image according to the feature points, wherein the first texture rating comprises at least one of the following texture ratings: a texture richness rating, a texture distribution rating, and a texture repetition rating; determine a texture contrast rating for the target image according to the contrast image; determine a lowest rating among the first texture rating and the texture contrast rating as a rating for the target image. 11. The apparatus according to claim 10 , wherein the processor is further configured to: derive a quantity of the feature points; and determine the texture richness rating according to the quantity. 12. The apparatus according to claim 10 , wherein the processor is further configured to: equally partition the target image into a number of grids; derive a quantity of the feature points in each of the grids, and determine the grids in which the quantity of the feature points is above a quantity threshold as valid grids; and determine the texture distribution rating according to a quantity of the valid grids and a total quantity of the grids. 13. The apparatus according to claim 10 , wherein the processor is further configured to: determine, for the feature points, projection points on a diagonal line of the target image according to a predefined angle; and determine the texture distribution rating according to distribution of the projection points along the diagonal line. 14. The apparatus according to claim 10 , wherein the processor is further configured to: derive a first feature value from within a predefined range surrounding the first feature point, and derive a second feature value from within a predefined range surrounding the second feature point; determine whether the first feature point and the second feature point are similar feature points according to the first feature value and the second feature value; and determine the text

Assignees

Inventors

Classifications

  • Salient features, e.g. scale invariant feature transforms [SIFT] · CPC title

  • Shifting the patterns to accommodate for positional errors · CPC title

  • Determining representative reference patterns, e.g. averaging or distorting patterns; Generating dictionaries · CPC title

  • relating to a temporal dimension, e.g. time-based feature extraction; Pattern tracking · CPC title

  • G06T7/246Primary

    using feature-based methods, e.g. the tracking of corners or segments · CPC title

Patent family

Related publications grouped by family.

External sources

Frequently asked questions

Answers are generated from the same data shown on this page.

What does patent US11023781B2 cover?
The present disclosure provides a method, an apparatus, a device for evaluating image tracking effectiveness and a readable storage medium. The method includes: extracting feature points from a target image according to a predefined algorithm; determining first texture information for the target image according to the feature points; processing the target image according to a predefined process…
Who is the assignee on this patent?
Baidu online network technology beijing co ltd
What technology area does this patent fall under?
Primary CPC classification G06T7/246. Mapped technology areas include Physics.
When was this patent published?
Publication date Tue Jun 01 2021 00:00:00 GMT+0000 (Coordinated Universal Time) (B2). Legal status and post-grant events are not shown on this page.
What related patents are in patentsdb?
We list 5 related publications on this page (citations in our corpus or others sharing the same primary CPC).