Methods and systems for crop land evaluation and crop growth management
US-2018181893-A1 · Jun 28, 2018 · US
US10993365B2 · US · B2
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Publication number | US-10993365-B2 |
| Application number | US-201816128380-A |
| Country | US |
| Kind code | B2 |
| Filing date | Sep 11, 2018 |
| Priority date | Sep 11, 2018 |
| Publication date | May 4, 2021 |
| Grant date | May 4, 2021 |
A practical reading order for non-experts. Skip the full description unless you need deep technical detail.
What the patent document calls the invention.
A short plain-language summary of the technical disclosure.
Who owns or filed the patent and who is credited as inventor.
Filing, priority, publication, and grant dates set the timeline.
The legal scope of protection — read this for what is actually claimed.
Technology tags used to group this patent with similar filings.
Prior art links and similar publications in this corpus.
Official abstract text for this publication.
Techniques are provided for receiving a first set of historical agricultural data and a second set of historical agricultural data; generating a plurality of projected target yield ranges using the first set and the second set of historical agricultural data by generating a historic yield distribution; generating one or more yield ranking scores for one or more fields of a grower using the first set of historical agricultural data, and assigning a projected target yield range of the plurality of projected target yield ranges to each of the one or more fields based on the one or more yield ranking scores to generate assigned projected target yield ranges; receiving a third set of historical agricultural data comprising seed optimization data, and generating a recommended change in seed population or a recommended change in seed density; causing displaying the yield improvement recommendation for each of the one or more fields.
Opening claim text (preview).
What is claimed is: 1. A computer-implemented method, comprising: receiving, over a digital data communication network at a server computer, a first set of historical agricultural data comprising grower yield data and grower seed placement data for a plurality of fields of a grower, and a second set of historical agricultural data comprising region yield data and region seed placement data for one or more other fields; generating, using the server computer, a plurality of projected target yield ranges for the grower using the first set and the second set of historical agricultural data by generating a historic yield distribution; using the server computer, for each field of the plurality of fields of the grower, generating a yield ranking score for the field using the first set of historical agricultural data, and assigning a projected target yield range of the plurality of projected target yield ranges to the field based on the yield ranking score to generate assigned projected target yield ranges for the plurality of fields; receiving, at the server computer, a third set of historical agricultural data comprising seed optimization data, and generating a yield improvement recommendation for each of the plurality of fields based on the assigned projected target yield ranges and the third set of historical agricultural data, wherein the yield improvement recommendation comprises a recommended change in seed population or a recommended change in seed density; in response to generating the yield improvement recommendation for each of the one or more fields, causing an agricultural machine to increase, decrease, or maintain planting of a total population of a seed type based on the recommended change in seed population for the one or more fields. 2. The computer-implemented method of claim 1 , further comprising: in response to generating the yield improvement recommendation for each of the one or more fields, automatically ordering an increased, decreased, or same number of seed bags based on the recommended change in seed population for the one or more fields. 3. The computer-implemented method of claim 1 , further comprising: in response to generating the yield improvement recommendation for each of the one or more fields, causing an agricultural machine to increase, decrease, or maintain a number of seeds planted per acre based on the recommended change in seed density for the one or more fields. 4. The computer-implemented method of claim 1 , wherein generating the plurality of projected target yield ranges for the grower further comprises generating a low projected target yield range, a middle low projected target yield range, a middle high projected target yield range, and a high projected yield range. 5. The computer-implemented method of claim 1 , wherein, for each field of the plurality of fields of the grower, assigning a projected target yield range to the field comprises assigning a low projected target yield range to a first field of the plurality of fields, a middle low project target yield range to a second field of the plurality of fields, a middle high projected target yield range to a third field of the plurality of fields, and a high projected target yield range to a fourth field of the plurality of fields. 6. The computer-implemented method of claim 1 , wherein the seed optimization data comprises a dataset of success probability scores for one or more hybrid seeds, the success probability scores defining a probability of a yield being achieved that exceeds an average yield for an environmental classification by a specified amount. 7. One or more non-transitory computer-readable storage media storing one or more instructions which, when executed by one or more server computing devices, cause: receiving, over a digital data communication network at a server computer, a first set of historical agricultural data comprising grower yield data and grower seed placement data for a plurality of fields of a grower, and a second set of historical agricultural data comprising region yield data and region seed placement data for one or more other fields; generating, using the server computer, a plurality of projected target yield ranges for the grower using the first set and the second set of historical agricultural data by generating a historic yield distribution; using the server computer, for each field of the plurality of fields of the grower, generating a yield ranking score for the field using the first set of historical agricultural data, and assigning a projected target yield range of the plurality of projected target yield ranges to the field based on the yield ranking score to generate assigned projected target yield ranges for the plurality of fields; receiving, at the server computer, a third set of historical agricultural data comprising seed optimization data, and generating a yield improvement recommendation for each of the plurality of fields based on the assigned projected target yield ranges and the third set of historical agricultural data, wherein the yield improvement recommendation comprises a recommended change in seed population or a recommended change in seed density; in response to generating the yield improvement recommendation for each of the one or more fields, causing an agricultural machine to increase, decrease, or maintain planting of a total population of a seed type based on the recommended change in seed population for the one or more fields. 8. The one or more non-transitory computer-readable storage media of claim 7 , further comprising: in response to generating the yield improvement recommendation for each of the one or more fields, automatically ordering an increased, decreased, or maintain number of seed bags based on the recommended change in seed population for the one or more fields. 9. The one or more non-transitory computer-readable storage media of claim 7 , further comprising: in response to generating the yield improvement recommendation for each of the one or more fields, causing an agricultural machine to increase, decrease, or maintain a number of seeds planted per acre based on the recommended change in seed density for the one or more fields. 10. The one or more non-transitory computer-readable storage media of claim 7 , wherein generating the plurality of projected target yield ranges for the grower further comprises generating a low projected target yield range, a middle low projected target yield range, a middle high projected target yield range, and a high projected yield range. 11. The one or more non-transitory computer-readable storage media of claim 10 , wherein, for each field of the plurality of fields of the grower, assigning a projected target yield range to the field comprises assigning a low projected target yield range to a first field of the plurality of fields, a middle low project target yield range to a second field of the plurality of fields, a middle high projected target yield range to a third field of the plurality of fields, and a high projected target yield range to a fourth field of the plurality of fields. 12. The one or more non-transitory computer-readable storage claim 11 , wherein the seed optimization data comprises a dataset of success probability scores for one or more hybrid seeds, the success probability scores defining a probability of a yield being achieved that exceeds an average yield for an environmental classification by a specified amount. 13. A server computer system, comprising: one or more processors; one or more non-transitory computer-readable storage media storing one or more instructions which, when executed using the one or more processors, cau
Precision agriculture · CPC title
Needs-based resource requirements planning or analysis · CPC title
Agriculture; Fishing; Forestry; Mining · CPC title
Regulating or controlling the seed rate · CPC title
Methods of fertilising {, sowing or planting} · CPC title
Related publications grouped by family.
Answers are generated from the same data shown on this page.