Method for increased productivity of polyhydroxyalkanoates (phas) in fed-batch processes for biomass derived from the treatment of wastewater
US-2015353967-A1 · Dec 10, 2015 · US
US10988394B2 · US · B2
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Publication number | US-10988394-B2 |
| Application number | US-201515528295-A |
| Country | US |
| Kind code | B2 |
| Filing date | Nov 19, 2015 |
| Priority date | Nov 19, 2014 |
| Publication date | Apr 27, 2021 |
| Grant date | Apr 27, 2021 |
A practical reading order for non-experts. Skip the full description unless you need deep technical detail.
What the patent document calls the invention.
A short plain-language summary of the technical disclosure.
Who owns or filed the patent and who is credited as inventor.
Filing, priority, publication, and grant dates set the timeline.
The legal scope of protection — read this for what is actually claimed.
Technology tags used to group this patent with similar filings.
Prior art links and similar publications in this corpus.
Official abstract text for this publication.
Techniques for controlled aeration ( 140 ) of wastewater ( 190 ) include determining a first aeration intensity for a first aeration interval and a different second aeration intensity for a second aeration interval ( 225 ) based on a current energy price ( 215 ), a predicted energy price ( 221 ), and a regulatory surveillance period ( 201 ) during which a regulated critical parameter is monitored for regulatory compliance. Wastewater is aerated at the first aeration intensity for the first aeration interval; and at the second aeration intensity for the second aeration interval. The first aeration interval is short compared to the regulatory surveillance period, the second aeration interval is short compared to the regulatory surveillance period and does not overlap the first aeration interval, and the first aeration intensity is less than the second aeration intensity.
Opening claim text (preview).
What is claimed is: 1. A method comprising: determining a first aeration intensity for a first aeration interval and a different second aeration intensity for a second aeration interval based on a current energy price, a predicted energy price, and a regulatory surveillance period during which a regulatory critical parameter is monitored for regulatory compliance, wherein the determining is based upon weighting factors influencing a total energy cost and a cost of deviating from a target of the regulatory critical parameter; aerating wastewater at the first aeration intensity for the first aeration interval, wherein the first aeration interval comprises an interval of high energy costs within the regulatory surveillance period and the first aeration intensity comprises an intensity resulting in a value of the critical parameter worse than a limiting value of the critical parameter, wherein the first aeration intensity is identified based upon a predicted purification performance of the first aeration intensity over the first aeration interval and determining an average of the first aeration intensity and the second aeration intensity will achieve compliance with the limiting value of the critical parameter; and aerating wastewater at the second aeration intensity for the second aeration interval, wherein the second aeration interval comprises an interval of low energy costs within the regulatory surveillance period and the second aeration intensity comprises an intensity resulting in a value of the critical parameter better than the limiting value of the critical parameter, wherein the second aeration intensity is identified based upon a predicted purification performance of the second aeration intensity over the second aeration interval; the first aeration intensity and the second aeration intensity being based upon determining an average of the first aeration intensity and the second aeration intensity will achieve compliance with the limiting value of the critical parameter; the first aeration interval being short compared to the regulatory surveillance period, the second aeration interval being short compared to the regulatory surveillance period and does not overlap the first aeration interval, and the first aeration intensity being less than the second aeration intensity and wherein the first aeration intensity and the second aeration intensity result in an average value of the critical parameter achieving compliance with the limiting value of the critical parameter within the regulatory surveillance period. 2. A method as recited in claim 1 , wherein: the first aeration interval is a time interval associated with an actual or predicted first energy price; and, the second aeration interval is a time interval associated with a different actual or different predicted second energy price that is less than the first energy price. 3. A method as recited in claim 1 , wherein the determining the first aeration intensity for the first aeration interval and the different second aeration intensity for the second aeration interval further comprises determining the first aeration intensity and the different second aeration intensity based on one or more of: historical plant purification data that indicates values for the treated effluent properties associated with aeration intensity; a monitoring procedure defined by the regulatory authority for determining any limiting value of the regulated critical parameter; and, aeration intensity calculated to meet the limiting value for the regulatory critical parameter. 4. A method as recited in claim 1 , wherein determining the first aeration intensity for the first aeration interval and the different second aeration intensity for the second aeration interval further comprises determining the first aeration intensity and the different second aeration intensity based on a weighting factor that accounts for site specific conditions between energy usage and purification performance. 5. A method as recited in claim 1 , wherein determining the first aeration intensity for the first aeration interval and the different second aeration intensity for the second aeration interval is repeated at a temporal period short compared to a temporal horizon to an end of the current regulatory surveillance period. 6. A method as recited in claim 1 , wherein determining the first aeration intensity for the first aeration interval and the different second aeration intensity for the second aeration interval further comprises: determining the first aeration intensity based on a first set point value for the regulatory critical parameter worse than a fixed set point that satisfies the limiting value; and, determining the second aeration intensity based on a different second set point value for the regulatory critical parameter better than the fixed set point. 7. A non-transitory computer-readable medium carrying one or more sequences of instructions, wherein execution of the one or more sequences of instructions by one or more processors causes the one or more processors to perform the step of: determining a first aeration intensity for a first aeration interval and a different second aeration intensity for a second aeration interval based on a current energy price, a predicted energy price, and a regulatory surveillance period during which a regulatory critical parameter is monitored for regulatory compliance, wherein the determining is based upon weighting factors influencing a total energy cost and a cost of deviating from a target of the regulatory critical parameter, wherein aeration of wastewater is determined to occur at the first aeration intensity for the first aeration interval, wherein the first aeration interval comprises an interval of high energy costs within the regulatory surveillance period and the first aeration intensity comprises an intensity resulting in a value of the critical parameter worse than a limiting value of the critical parameter, wherein the first aeration intensity is identified based upon a predicted purification performance of the first aeration intensity over the first aeration interval and determining an average of the first aeration intensity and the second aeration intensity will achieve compliance with the limiting value of the critical parameter, aeration of wastewater is determined to occur at the second aeration intensity for the second aeration interval, wherein the second aeration interval comprises an interval of low energy costs within the regulatory surveillance period and the second aeration intensity comprises an intensity resulting in a value of the critical parameter better than the limiting value of the critical parameter, wherein the second aeration intensity is identified based upon a predicted purification performance of the second aeration intensity over the second aeration interval, the first aeration intensity and the second aeration intensity being based upon determining an average of the first aeration intensity and the second aeration intensity will achieve compliance with the limiting value of the critical parameter; the first aeration interval being short compared to the regulatory surveillance period, the second aeration interval being short compared to the regulatory surveillance period and does not overlap the first aeration interval, and the first aeration intensity being less than the second aeration intensity and wherein the first aeration intensity and the second aeration intensity result in an average value of the critical parameter achieving compliance with the limiting value of the critical parameter within the regulatory surveillance period. 8. A non-transitory computer-readable medium in claim 7 , wherein: the first aeration interval is a time interval asso
using solar energy · CPC title
Aerobic processes · CPC title
Upstream control, i.e. monitoring for predictive control · CPC title
Biological treatment of water, waste water, or sewage · CPC title
using wind energy · CPC title
Related publications grouped by family.
Answers are generated from the same data shown on this page.