Parallel feeders for continued operation
US-2024310424-A1 · Sep 19, 2024 · US
US10976357B2 · US · B2
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Publication number | US-10976357-B2 |
| Application number | US-201815874193-A |
| Country | US |
| Kind code | B2 |
| Filing date | Jan 18, 2018 |
| Priority date | Jan 18, 2017 |
| Publication date | Apr 13, 2021 |
| Grant date | Apr 13, 2021 |
A practical reading order for non-experts. Skip the full description unless you need deep technical detail.
What the patent document calls the invention.
A short plain-language summary of the technical disclosure.
Who owns or filed the patent and who is credited as inventor.
Filing, priority, publication, and grant dates set the timeline.
The legal scope of protection — read this for what is actually claimed.
Technology tags used to group this patent with similar filings.
Prior art links and similar publications in this corpus.
Official abstract text for this publication.
A method for determining the fault location of a ground fault relating to a line of a three-phase electrical energy supply network with an ungrounded neutral point, in which current and voltage values are measured at one line end of the line. Following the occurrence of a ground fault on the line, the location of the fault is defined using the measured current and voltage values. The measured current and voltage values are converted into α-components and 0-components of a Clarke transformation, a location-dependent characteristic function of α-component and 0-component fault voltage values is defined in each case using the converted components and a propagation model for travelling waves on the line. The fault location is determined to be the location at which the two characteristic functions exhibit the closest match.
Opening claim text (preview).
The invention claimed is: 1. A method for determining the fault location of a ground fault relating to a line of a three-phase electrical energy supply network with an ungrounded neutral point, the method comprising: measuring current and voltage values at a line end of the line; determining, with a fault-localizing device disposed at the line end, whether a fault has occurred on the line using the measured current and voltage values, the fault-localizing device including a processor; following an occurrence of a ground fault on the line, determining, with the fault-localizing device, a fault location of the ground fault by: converting the measured current and voltage values using a Clarke transformation into α-components and 0-components of the Clarke transformation; defining a location-dependent characteristic function of α-component fault voltage values using the current and voltage values converted into the α-component and a propagation model for travelling waves on the line; defining a location-dependent characteristic function of 0-component fault voltage values using the current and voltage values converted into the 0-component and a propagation model for travelling waves on the line; determining a matching of the two characteristic functions for different selected locations on the line; and defining a selected location where the two characteristic functions exhibit a closest match as the fault location of the ground fault on the line; and outputting the fault location of the ground fault at least one of: locally on the fault-localizing device; or as an electronic message sent from the fault-localizing device to a control center. 2. The method according to claim 1 , which comprises determining the closest match of the two characteristic functions through an optimization of a target function, and thereby using the selected location on the line as an optimization variable for the target function. 3. The method according to claim 2 , wherein the location for which a minimum of a difference between the two characteristic functions occurs is defined with the target function as the fault location. 4. The method according to claim 2 , wherein, in the formation of the target function, frequency-dependent amplitude and/or phase angle errors can be taken into account by measuring transformers used to measure the current and voltage value. 5. The method according to claim 2 , which comprises using an iterative optimization method for the optimization. 6. The method according to claim 5 , which comprises using a simplex downhill method as the optimization method. 7. The method according to claim 1 , which comprises: converting the measured current and voltage values using the Clarke transformation into β-components of the Clarke transformation; comparing the β-components of the current and/or voltage measured values of the individual phases with one another; and determining the phase for which the β-components of the current and/or voltage measured values measured before the fault occurrence compared with the β-components of the current and/or voltage measured values measured after the fault occurrence exhibit a smallest change as being affected by the ground fault. 8. The method according to claim 7 , which comprises defining the fault location only for a phase that is affected by the ground fault. 9. The method according to claim 1 , which comprises: subjecting the current and voltage measured values converted into the α-component and into the 0-component of the Clarke transformation to a transformation into a frequency domain; and defining the fault location within a selected frequency range which is higher than a network frequency of the energy supply network. 10. The method according to claim 9 , which comprises selecting a frequency range that comprises band-limited transient components of the α-component and the 0-component of the measured current and voltage values. 11. The method according to claim 10 , wherein the frequency range lies between 600 Hz and 15 kHz. 12. The method according to claim 1 , which comprises filtering the measured current and voltage values before performing the Clarke transformation, and thereby using a low-pass filter for filtering. 13. The method according to claim 1 , which comprises: continuously monitoring the line for an occurrence of a ground fault; and defining the fault location only if a ground fault relating to the line has been detected. 14. The method according to claim 13 , which comprises detecting a presence of a ground fault if a jump which exceeds a predefined threshold has been identified in the characteristic of the current and voltage values or values derived therefrom, or if a behavior of a zero-sequence current sum and a displacement voltage of a characteristic of a ground fault occurs. 15. The method according to claim 1 , wherein the line is a cable made up of a plurality of segments and the method further comprises defining a connection point between two segments of the cable which is closest to the fault location defined in the optimization of the target function as the actual fault location of a self-extinguishing ground fault. 16. The method of claim 1 , wherein the fault-localizing device is an electrical protection device configured to, in the event of a determination of a fault by the processor of the fault-localizing device, transmit a shutdown signal in order to shut down the line. 17. A device for determining a fault location of a ground fault relating to a line of a three-phase electrical energy supply network with an ungrounded neutral point, the device comprising: a processing device which is configured to determine whether a fault has occurred, using first current and voltage values measured at an end of the line; said processing device being configured to, following an occurrence of a fault on the line, define the fault location of the fault, using the first current and voltage values; said processing device being configured to convert measured current and voltage values using a Clarke transformation into α-components and 0-components of the Clarke transformation; said processing device being configured to define a location-dependent characteristic function of α-component fault voltage values using the current and voltage values converted into the α-component and a propagation model for travelling waves on the line; said processing device being configured to define a location-dependent characteristic function of 0-component fault voltage values using the current and voltage values converted into the 0-component and the propagation model for travelling waves on the line; said processing device being configured to determine a matching of the two characteristic functions for different selected locations on the line; and said processing device being configured to define the selected location where the two characteristic functions reveal a closest match as the fault location of the ground fault on the line; and said processing device being configured to output the fault location of the ground fault at least one of: locally on the device; or as an electronic message sent from the device to a control center. 18. The device of claim 17 , wherein said device is an electrical protection device configured to, in the event of a determination of a fault by said processing device, transmit a shutdown signal in order to shut down the line.
in power transmission or distribution networks, i.e. with interconnected conductors · CPC title
Testing for short-circuits, leakage current or ground faults · CPC title
Indicating that current or voltage is either above or below a predetermined value or within or outside a predetermined range of values · CPC title
Locating faults in cables, transmission lines, or networks · CPC title
Testing of electric apparatus, lines, cables or components for short-circuits, continuity, leakage current or incorrect line connections (testing of sparking plugs H01T13/58) · CPC title
Related publications grouped by family.
Answers are generated from the same data shown on this page.