Selecting key performance indicators for anomaly detection analytics
US-2017124502-A1 · May 4, 2017 · US
US10956253B2 · US · B2
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Publication number | US-10956253-B2 |
| Application number | US-201816197556-A |
| Country | US |
| Kind code | B2 |
| Filing date | Nov 21, 2018 |
| Priority date | Jul 20, 2016 |
| Publication date | Mar 23, 2021 |
| Grant date | Mar 23, 2021 |
A practical reading order for non-experts. Skip the full description unless you need deep technical detail.
What the patent document calls the invention.
A short plain-language summary of the technical disclosure.
Who owns or filed the patent and who is credited as inventor.
Filing, priority, publication, and grant dates set the timeline.
The legal scope of protection — read this for what is actually claimed.
Technology tags used to group this patent with similar filings.
Prior art links and similar publications in this corpus.
Official abstract text for this publication.
Methods and systems for detecting anomalous behavior include performing a principal component analysis on a plurality of key performance indicators (KPIs) to determine a set of principal axes. The KPIs are clustered in a space defined by the set of principal axes. Local and structural anomalies are determined in the clustered KPIs. The structural and local anomalies are classified based on historical information. A transformation is performed from a space based on the principal axes to an original space. It is determined whether each of the local and structural anomalies is a global or a local anomaly. A management action is performed based on the classified structural and local anomalies.
Opening claim text (preview).
What is claimed is: 1. A method for detecting anomalous behavior, comprising: performing a principal component analysis on a plurality of key performance indicators (KPIs) to determine a set of principal axes; clustering the KPIs in a space defined by the set of principal axes; determining local and structural anomalies in the clustered KPIs; classifying the structural and local anomalies based on historical information; transforming from a space based on the principal axes to an original space; determining whether each of the local and structural anomalies is a global anomaly or a local anomaly; and performing a management action based on the classified structural and local anomalies. 2. The method of claim 1 , wherein determining structural anomalies comprises determining how closely each cluster of KPIs conforms to a Gaussian distribution. 3. The method of claim 1 , wherein classifying structural anomalies comprises determining whether a cluster that does not conform to a Gaussian distribution conformed to a Gaussian distribution at a previous time. 4. The method of claim 1 , wherein determining local anomalies comprises comparing a distance of each individual KPI from its respective cluster mean to a threshold. 5. The method of claim 4 , wherein determining local anomalies comprises performing said comparison only for KPIs in clusters that conform to a Gaussian distribution. 6. The method of claim 4 , wherein classifying local anomalies comprises determining whether a KPI is an isolated outlier. 7. The method of claim 6 , wherein classifying local anomalies comprises determining whether the KPI has gone from a distance below a first threshold at a previous sampling time to a current distance that is above a second, higher threshold. 8. The method of claim 6 , wherein classifying local anomalies comprises determining whether there is a trend across multiple previous sampling times from a distance below a first threshold toward a second, higher threshold. 9. A non-transitory computer readable storage medium comprising a computer readable program for detecting anomalous behavior, wherein the computer readable program when executed on a computer causes the computer to perform the steps of performing a principal component analysis on a plurality of key performance indicators (KPIs) to determine a set of principal axes; clustering the KPIs in a space defined by the set of principal axes; determining local and structural anomalies in the clustered KPIs; classifying the structural and local anomalies based on historical information; transforming from a space based on the principal axes to an original space; determining whether each of the local and structural anomalies is a global anomaly or a local anomaly; and performing a management action based on the classified structural and local anomalies. 10. A system for detecting anomalous behavior, comprising: a detection module comprising a processor configured to perform a principal component analysis on a plurality of key performance indicators (KPIs) to determine a set of principal axes, to cluster the KPIs in a space defined by the set of principal axes, and to determine local and structural anomalies in the clustered KPIs; a classification module configured to classify the structural and local anomalies based on historical information and to transform from a space based on the principal axes to an original space and to determine whether each of the local and structural anomalies is a global anomaly or a local anomaly; and a management module configured to perform a management action based on the classified structural and local anomalies. 11. The system of claim 10 , wherein the detection module is further configured to determine how closely each cluster of KPIs conforms to a Gaussian distribution. 12. The system of claim 11 , wherein the classification module is further configured to determine whether a cluster that does not conform to a Gaussian distribution conformed to a Gaussian distribution at a previous time. 13. The system of claim 10 , wherein the detection module is further configured to compare a distance of each individual KPI from its respective cluster mean to a threshold. 14. The system of claim 13 , wherein the classification module is further configured to perform said comparison only for KPIs in clusters that conform to a Gaussian distribution. 15. The system of claim 13 , wherein the classification module is further configured to determine whether a KPI is an isolated outlier. 16. The system of claim 15 , wherein the classification module is further configured to determine whether the KPI has gone from a distance below a first threshold at a previous sampling time to a current distance that is above a second, higher threshold. 17. The system of claim 15 , wherein the classification module is further configured to determine whether there is a trend across multiple previous sampling times from a distance below a first threshold toward a second, higher threshold.
Root cause analysis, i.e. error or fault diagnosis (in a hardware test environment G06F11/22; in a software test environment G06F11/36) · CPC title
Performance evaluation by statistical analysis · CPC title
Related publications grouped by family.
Answers are generated from the same data shown on this page.