Document decomposition based on determined logical visual layering of document content
US-2024403543-A1 · Dec 5, 2024 · US
US10949612B2 · US · B2
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Publication number | US-10949612-B2 |
| Application number | US-201615376085-A |
| Country | US |
| Kind code | B2 |
| Filing date | Dec 12, 2016 |
| Priority date | Mar 30, 2012 |
| Publication date | Mar 16, 2021 |
| Grant date | Mar 16, 2021 |
A practical reading order for non-experts. Skip the full description unless you need deep technical detail.
What the patent document calls the invention.
A short plain-language summary of the technical disclosure.
Who owns or filed the patent and who is credited as inventor.
Filing, priority, publication, and grant dates set the timeline.
The legal scope of protection — read this for what is actually claimed.
Technology tags used to group this patent with similar filings.
Prior art links and similar publications in this corpus.
Official abstract text for this publication.
Resolving conflicting changes to structured data files. A method includes for a structured data file which has both a generic structure and dialects built on top of the generic structure, for which conflicting changes have been made, and where an original version of the structured data, a first version of the structured data and a second version of the structured data exist, determining a dialect of the structured data. The method further includes, based on the determined dialect performing at least one of merge or diff operations on the original version of the structured data, the first version of the structured data and the second version of the structured data.
Opening claim text (preview).
What is claimed is: 1. In a computing environment, a method of resolving conflicting changes to structured data files, the method comprising: for a structured data file which has both a generic structure and dialects built on top of the generic structure, for which conflicting changes have been made, and where an original version of the structured data, a first version of the structured data and a second version of the structured data exist: determining a dialect that is used for the structured data, the determined dialect imposing semantic rules for determining differences in the structured data; and based on the determined dialect, performing a two-way diff comprising: determining a set of differences, diff1, between the original version of the structured data and the first version of the structured data, determining a second set of differences, diff2, between the original version of the structured data and the second version of the structured data, and performing a three-way diff comprising: traversing diff1 to: determine changes in diff1 which do not conflict with changes in diff2, and determine changes in diff1 which do conflict with changes in diff2, and traversing diff2 to: determine changes in diff2 which do not conflict with changes in diff1, and determine changes in diff2 which do conflict with changes in diff1; and performing a merge by: applying to the original version of the structured data non-conflicting changes in the differences between the original version and the first version and differences between the original version and the second version; and resolving conflicts between the differences between the original version and the first version and differences between the original version and the second version. 2. The method of claim 1 further comprising: identifying a rule file associated with the determined dialect; using the rule file, identifying different subsets of one or more of the three versions of the structured data file and at least one of different merge or diff rules associated with the different subsets of one or more of the three versions of the structured data file; and applying the different rules to the different subsets of one or more of the three versions of the structured data file. 3. The method of claim 2 , wherein using the rule file identifying different subsets of one or more of the three versions of the structured data file and at least one of different merge or diff rules associated with the different subsets of one or more of the three versions of the structured data the file, comprises following an Xpath expression. 4. The method of claim 2 , wherein the rule file comprises a rule specifying that a merge is not resolved for a particular subset of one or more of the three versions of the structured data file. 5. The method of claim 2 , wherein the rule file comprises a rule specifying that order matters for at least one of merge or diff operations for a particular subset of one or more of the three versions of the structured data file. 6. The method of claim 2 , wherein the rule file comprises a rule specifying that order does not matter for at least one of merge or diff operations for a particular subset of one or more of the three versions of the structured data file. 7. The method of claim 2 , wherein the rule file comprises a rule specifying that differences in specific identified attributes do not matter for at least one of merge or diff operations for a particular subset of one or more of the three versions of the structured data file. 8. The method of claim 2 , wherein the rule file comprises a rule specifying a subset of one or more of the three versions of the structured data file as requiring uniqueness such that two or more modified data items with the same unique identifier are in conflict. 9. The method of claim 8 , further comprising resolving the conflict by creating one or more new unique identifiers. 10. The method of claim 2 , wherein the rule file comprises a rule specifying that a particular portion of one or more of the three versions of the structured data file should not be semantically merged. 11. The method of claim 1 wherein determining a dialect comprises examining a description document. 12. The method of claim 1 wherein determining a dialect comprises examining the structured text data file. 13. The method of claim 1 further comprising automatically generating rules for at least one of semantic merge or diff operations based on previously existing semantic format descriptions for structured data. 14. The method of claim 1 , wherein the dialect specifies a related set of structured textual data to be operated on. 15. The method of claim 1 , further comprising merging the different versions while preserving human context recognizability. 16. The method of claim 15 wherein merging the different versions while preserving human context recognizability comprises preserving whitespace structure across the file. 17. The method of claim 15 wherein merging the different versions while preserving human context recognizability comprises preserving comment adjacency. 18. One or more computer readable storage devices comprising computer executable instructions that when executed by one or more processors cause one or more processors to perform the following: for a structured data file which has both a generic structure and dialects built on top of the generic structure, for which conflicting changes have been made, and where an original version of the structured data, a first version of the structured data and a second version of the structured data exist, determining a dialect of the structured data, the determined dialect imposing semantic rules for determining differences in the structured data; and based on the determined dialect, performing a two-way diff comprising: determining a set of differences, diff1, between the original version of the structured data and the first version of the structured data, determining a second set of differences, diff2, between the original version of the structured data and the second version of the structured data, and performing a three-way diff comprising: traversing diff1 to: determine changes in diff1 which do not conflict with changes in diff2, and determine changes in diff1 which do conflict with changes in diff2, and traversing diff2 to: determine changes in diff2 which do not conflict with changes in diff1, and determine changes in diff2 which do conflict with changes in diff1; and performing a merge by: applying to the original version of the structured data non-conflicting changes in the differences between the original version and the first version and differences between the original version and the second version and resolving conflicts between the differences between the original version and the first version and differences between the original version and the second version. 19. In a computing environment, a system for resolving conflicting changes to structured data files, the system comprising: one or more computer processors; and computer readable memory having stored therein computer executable instructions which, when executed on the one or more processors, configures the system to instantiate: a file repository configured to store a latest version of a structured text data file and to check the latest version of the structured text data file out to users, wherein the latest version of the structured text data file is an authoritative version of the struc
Version control (for software G06F8/71) · CPC title
Concurrency control, e.g. optimistic or pessimistic approaches · CPC title
Ensuring data consistency and integrity · CPC title
Parsing · CPC title
Markup, e.g. Standard Generalized Markup Language [SGML] or Document Type Definition [DTD] · CPC title
Related publications grouped by family.
Answers are generated from the same data shown on this page.