Parallel Processing Of Data
US-2024338235-A1 · Oct 10, 2024 · US
US10936478B2 · US · B2
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Publication number | US-10936478-B2 |
| Application number | US-201916244567-A |
| Country | US |
| Kind code | B2 |
| Filing date | Jan 10, 2019 |
| Priority date | Jan 10, 2019 |
| Publication date | Mar 2, 2021 |
| Grant date | Mar 2, 2021 |
A practical reading order for non-experts. Skip the full description unless you need deep technical detail.
What the patent document calls the invention.
A short plain-language summary of the technical disclosure.
Who owns or filed the patent and who is credited as inventor.
Filing, priority, publication, and grant dates set the timeline.
The legal scope of protection — read this for what is actually claimed.
Technology tags used to group this patent with similar filings.
Prior art links and similar publications in this corpus.
Official abstract text for this publication.
A method may include obtaining original source code including entities. The entities each correspond to a location in the original source code. The method may further include generating, from the original source code, a dependency graph including nodes corresponding to the entities, extracting a location index that maps each location in the original source code to one of the nodes, identifying modified locations in the original source code by comparing modified source code to the original source code, obtaining, for each of the modified locations and by searching the location index, matching nodes, determining, for each of the matching nodes, impacted nodes reachable from the matching node, and identifying, using the location index, impacted entities corresponding to the impacted nodes.
Opening claim text (preview).
What is claimed is: 1. A method, comprising: obtaining original source code comprising a plurality of entities, wherein the plurality of entities each correspond to a location in the original source code; generating, from the original source code and by a computer processor, a dependency graph comprising a plurality of nodes corresponding to the plurality of entities; extracting, by the computer processor, a location index that maps each location in the original source code to one of the plurality of nodes, wherein the location index is separate from the dependency graph; identifying a plurality of modified locations in the original source code by comparing modified source code to the original source code; obtaining, for each of the plurality of modified locations and by searching the location index, matching nodes of the plurality of nodes; determining, for each of the matching nodes, impacted nodes of the plurality of nodes reachable from the matching node; restricting the impacted nodes based on an edge type to obtain filtered impacted nodes, wherein each impacted node of the filtered impacted nodes is connected by a directed edge having the edge type to a node in a path of the dependency graph between the matching node and the impacted node; and identifying, using the location index, impacted entities of the plurality of entities corresponding to the filtered impacted nodes. 2. The method of claim 1 , further comprising: obtaining, for each of a plurality of tests, covered entities of the plurality of entities; identifying, for each of the plurality of tests, covered impacted entities common to the impacted entities and the covered entities for the test; and obtaining test priorities by prioritizing execution of the plurality of tests using the covered impacted entities for each of the plurality of tests. 3. The method of claim 2 , further comprising: generating a report comprising the impacted entities and the test priorities. 4. The method of claim 1 , further comprising: determining, based on the comparing of the modified source code to the original source code, that a level of imprecision of the dependency graph exceeds a predetermined threshold; and in response to determining that the level of imprecision exceeds the predetermined threshold, re-generating the dependency graph using the modified source code. 5. The method of claim 1 , wherein comparing the modified source code to the original source code comprises determining modifications that result in the modified source code when applied to the original source code, and wherein each of the modifications comprises a first location in the original source code and a second location in the modified source code. 6. The method of claim 1 , wherein identifying the impacted nodes reachable from the matching node comprises: identifying, for each of the impacted nodes, a path in the dependency graph between the matching node and the impacted node, wherein the impacted node has a specific node type. 7. The method of claim 1 , wherein identifying the impacted nodes reachable from the matching node comprises: identifying, for each of the impacted nodes, a path in the dependency graph between the matching node and the impacted node, wherein the path comprises an edge connected to the impacted node, and wherein the edge has a specific edge type. 8. A system, comprising: a memory coupled to a computer processor; a repository configured to store: original source code comprising a plurality of entities, wherein the plurality of entities each correspond to a location in the original source code, modified source code, a dependency graph comprising a plurality of nodes corresponding to the plurality of entities, and a location index that maps each location in the original source code to one of the plurality of nodes, wherein the location index is separate from the dependency graph; a difference generator, executing on the computer processor and using the memory, configured to identify a plurality of modified locations by comparing the modified source code to the original source code; and an impact analyzer, executing on the computer processor and using the memory, configured to: generate the dependency graph from the original source code, extract the location index, obtain, for each of the plurality of modified locations and by searching the location index, matching nodes of the plurality of nodes, determine, for each of the matching nodes, impacted nodes of the plurality of nodes reachable from the matching node, restrict the impacted nodes based on an edge type to obtain filtered impacted nodes, wherein each impacted node of the filtered impacted nodes is connected by a directed edge having the edge type to a node in a path of the dependency graph between the matching node and the impacted node, and identify, using the location index, impacted entities of the plurality of entities corresponding to the filtered impacted nodes. 9. The system of claim 8 , wherein the impact analyzer is further configured to: obtain, for each of a plurality of tests, covered entities of the plurality of entities, identify, for each of the plurality of tests, covered impacted entities common to the impacted entities and the covered entities for the test, and obtain test priorities by prioritizing execution of the plurality of tests using the covered impacted entities for each of the plurality of tests. 10. The system of claim 9 , wherein the impact analyzer is further configured to: generate a report comprising the impacted entities and the test priorities. 11. The system of claim 8 , wherein the impact analyzer is further configured to: determine, based on the comparing of the modified source code to the original source code, that a level of imprecision of the dependency graph exceeds a predetermined threshold, and in response to determining that the level of imprecision exceeds the predetermined threshold, re-generate the dependency graph using the modified source code. 12. The system of claim 8 , wherein the difference generator is further configured to compare the modified source code to the original source code by determining modifications that result in the modified source code when applied to the original source code, and wherein each of the modifications comprises a first location in the original source code and a second location in the modified source code. 13. The system of claim 8 , wherein the impact analyzer is further configured to: identify, for each of the impacted nodes, a path in the dependency graph between the matching node and the impacted node, wherein the impacted node has a specific node type. 14. The system of claim 8 , wherein the impact analyzer is further configured to: identify, for each of the impacted nodes, a path in the dependency graph between the matching node and the impacted node, wherein the path comprises an edge connected to the impacted node, and wherein the edge has a specific edge type. 15. A non-transitory computer readable medium comprising instructions that, when executed by a computer processor, perform: obtaining original source code comprising a plurality of entities, wherein the plurality of entities each correspond to a location in the original source code; generating, from the original source code, a dependency graph comprising a plurality of nodes corresponding to the plurality of entities; extracting a location index that maps each location in the original source code to one of the plurality of nodes, wherein the location index is separate from the dependency
for test version control, e.g. updating test cases to a new software version · CPC title
for coverage analysis · CPC title
where the reporting involves the use of self describing data formats, i.e. metadata, markup languages, human readable formats · CPC title
Dependency analysis; Data or control flow analysis · CPC title
Threshold · CPC title
Related publications grouped by family.
Answers are generated from the same data shown on this page.