Manufacturing process control with deep learning-based predictive model for hot metal temperature of blast furnace
US-10633716-B2 · Apr 28, 2020 · US
US10935320B2 · US · B2
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Publication number | US-10935320-B2 |
| Application number | US-201816002419-A |
| Country | US |
| Kind code | B2 |
| Filing date | Jun 7, 2018 |
| Priority date | Apr 12, 2013 |
| Publication date | Mar 2, 2021 |
| Grant date | Mar 2, 2021 |
A practical reading order for non-experts. Skip the full description unless you need deep technical detail.
What the patent document calls the invention.
A short plain-language summary of the technical disclosure.
Who owns or filed the patent and who is credited as inventor.
Filing, priority, publication, and grant dates set the timeline.
The legal scope of protection — read this for what is actually claimed.
Technology tags used to group this patent with similar filings.
Prior art links and similar publications in this corpus.
Official abstract text for this publication.
Method for determining the state of a fire-resistant lining of a vessel containing molten metal in particular in which maintenance data, production data, and wall thicknesses at least at locations with the highest degree of wear are measured or ascertained together with additional process parameters of at least one identical/similar vessel after the vessel has been used. The data is collected and stored in a data structure. A calculating model is generated from at least some of the measured or ascertained data or parameters, and the data or parameters are evaluated using the calculating model using calculations and subsequent analyses. Thus, related or integral ascertaining processes and subsequent analyses can be carried out, on the basis of which optimizations relating to both the vessel lining as well as the complete process of the molten metal in the vessel are achieved.
Opening claim text (preview).
The invention claimed is: 1. A method for managing vessels receivable of molten metal, comprising: obtaining a first set of data about one of the vessels before operational use of the vessel, the first set of data including thickness of blocks of a refractory lining of the vessel and data about materials injected into the refractory lining; obtaining a second set of data about operational use of the vessel, the second set of data including identity of molten metal operatively received by the vessel, properties of the molten metal operatively received by the vessel including amount, temperature and composition of the molten metal operatively received by the vessel, composition of slag in the vessel and thickness of the slag, tapping times using the vessel, temperature profiles of the molten metal operatively received by the vessel, treatment times of the molten metal operatively received by the vessel, metallurgical parameters of the molten metal operatively received by the vessel, and a manner in which the molten metal is poured or tapped into and out of the vessel; obtaining a third set of data about the refractory lining after use of the vessel, the third set of data including thickness of the refractory lining at points of wear; storing the first, second and third sets of data in a data storage unit; evaluating the state of the refractory lining based on at least a portion of data in the first, second and third sets of data which provides information about use of the refractory lining; and determining, based on the current state of the refractory lining and the evaluating of the state of the refractory lining, which one of the following changes in the refractory lining or use of the refractory lining is required to optimize a service life of the refractory lining: 1) repair of the refractory lining, and then repairing the refractory lining and using the repaired refractory lining such that the refractory lining has an improved operational state relative to the state of the refractory lining during previous operational use, 2) altering of existing properties of the refractory lining, and then altering properties of the refractory lining and using the refractory lining with the altered properties such that the refractory lining with the altered properties has an improved operational state relative to the state of the refractory lining during previous operational use; and 3) altering current use of the vessel including the refractory lining, and then preparing for altered use of the vessel including the refractory lining which altered use is different from previous use of the vessel including the refractory lining and using the vessel including the refractory lining in an altered manner such that the refractory lining has an improved operational state relative to the state of the refractory lining during previous operational use. 2. The method according to claim 1 , further comprising: checking the data in the first, second and third sets of data for plausibility before evaluating the state of the refractory lining based on at least the portion of data in the first, second and third sets of data, evaluating whether there is a lack or an anomaly of one or more values of the data in the first, second or third sets of data; when there is a lack of one or more values of the data in the first, second or third sets of data, correcting the lack of one or more values of the data and when there is an anomaly of one or more values of the data in the first, second or third sets of data, deleting the anomaly of one or more values of the data. 3. The method according to claim 2 , further comprising, after checking the data in the first, second and third sets of data, storing the checked data in the data storage unit as an assembled, valid set of data. 4. The method according to claim 2 , further comprising selecting only a portion of the data in the first, second and third sets of data for use when evaluating the state of the refractory lining dependent upon empirical values or by calculation methods. 5. The method according to claim 2 , wherein the vessel is divided into different sections, and wherein the step of evaluating the state of the refractory lining comprises evaluating these sections independently of one another on the basis of all of the data in the first, second and third sets of data. 6. The method according to claim 5 , further comprising selecting the sections distributed over a circumference of the vessel and over its height. 7. The method according to claim 1 , further comprising selecting only a portion of the data in the first, second and third sets of data for use when evaluating the state of the refractory lining dependent upon empirical values or by calculation methods. 8. The method according to claim 7 , wherein the selection of only the portion of the data in the first, second and third sets of data occurs by means of algorithms, one of the algorithms being a random feature selection. 9. The method according to claim 7 , further comprising using data other than the data being used to evaluate the state of the refractory lining for statistical purposes or for later recording of data. 10. The method according to claim 1 , further comprising measuring the wall thickness of the refractory lining after a number of tappings, the step of evaluating the state of the refractory lining comprising evaluating the state of the refractory lining based on the measured wall thickness of the refractory lining after the number of tappings in addition to the at least the portion of data in the first, second and third sets of data. 11. The method according to claim 10 , further comprising testing the refractory lining with altered properties, when it is determined that altering of existing properties of the refractory lining is required and then the properties of the refractory lining are altered, in order to test or simulate process sequences derived from the evaluating of the state of the refractory lining and in order to make specific changes in actual operation. 12. The method according to claim 1 , wherein the vessel is divided into different sections, and wherein the step of evaluating the state of the refractory lining comprises evaluating these sections independently of one another on the basis of all of the data in the first, second and third sets of data. 13. The method according to claim 12 , further comprising selecting the sections distributed over a circumference of the vessel and over its height. 14. The method according to claim 12 , wherein the vessel is a converter. 15. The method according to claim 1 , wherein the step of evaluating the state of the refractory lining based on at least a portion of data in the first, second and third sets of data comprises generating a mathematical model that provides an indication of wear of the refractory lining based on the at least the portion of data in the first, second and third sets of data, further comprising: checking the data in the first, second and third sets of data for plausibility before generating the model from at least the portion of data in the first, second and third sets of data, and only thereafter storing the checked data in the data storage unit as an assembled, valid set of data. 16. The method according to claim 1 , wherein at least a portion of the data in the first, second and third sets of data is obtained by being detected or measured using measuring apparatus, further comprising: detecting or measuring using the measuring apparatus a fourth set of data about initial construction of the refractory lining, th
Aspects of construction intended to prevent wear · CPC title
Lining wear indicators · CPC title
for measuring thickness {; e.g. of sheet material (thickness measurement by thermal means G01B21/085)} · CPC title
Devices for monitoring temperature · CPC title
for measuring thickness · CPC title
Related publications grouped by family.
Answers are generated from the same data shown on this page.